As AI leader Nvidia posts record results, Warren Buffett’s made a surprise bet on Google
- Written by Cameron Shackell, Adjunct Fellow, Centre for Policy Futures, The University of Queensland; Queensland University of Technology
The world’s most valuable publicly listed company, US microchip maker Nvidia, has reported record $US57 billion[1] revenue in the third quarter of 2025, beating Wall Street estimates. The chipmaker said revenue will rise again to $US65 billion in the last part of the year.
The better than expected results calmed global investors’ jitters[2] following a tumultuous week for Nvidia and broader worries about the artificial intelligence (AI) bubble bursting[3].
Just weeks ago, Nvidia became the first company valued at more than $US5 trillion[4] – surpassing others in the “magnificent seven[5]” tech companies: Alphabet (owner of Google), Amazon, Apple, Tesla, Meta (owner of Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp) and Microsoft.
Nvidia stocks[6] were up more than 5% to $US196 in after-hours trading immediately following the results.
Over the past week, news broke that tech billionaire Peter Thiel’s hedge fund had sold its entire stake[7] in Nvidia in the third quarter of 2025 – more than half a million shares, worth around $US100 million.
But in that same quarter, an even more famous billionaire’s firm made a surprise bet on Alphabet, signalling confidence in Google’s ability to profit from the AI era.
Buffett’s new stake in Google
Based in Omaha, Nebraska in the United States, Berkshire Hathaway is a global investing giant, led for decades by 95-year-old veteran Warren Buffett[8].
Berkshire Hathaway’s latest quarterly filing[9] reveals the company accumulated a US$4.3 billion stake in Alphabet over the September quarter.
The size of the investment suggests a strategic decision – especially as the same filing showed Berkshire had significantly sold down its massive Apple position[10]. (Apple remains Berkshire’s single largest stock holding, currently worth about US$64 billion.)
Buffett is about to step down[11] as Berkshire’s chief executive. Analysts are speculating this investment may offer a pre-retirement clue about where durable profits in the digital economy could come from.
Buffett’s record of picking winners with ‘moats’
Buffett has picked many winners[12] over the decades, from American Express to Coca Cola.
Yet he has long expressed scepticism toward technology businesses. He also has form in getting big tech bets wrong, most notably his underwhelming investment in IBM[13] a decade ago.
With Peter Thiel and Japan’s richest man Masayoshi Son[14] both recently exiting Nvidia[15], it may be tempting to think the “Oracle of Omaha”[16] is turning up as the party is ending.
But that framing misunderstands Buffett’s investment philosophy[17] and the nature of Google’s business.
Buffett is not late to AI. He is doing what he’s always done: betting on a company he believes has an “economic moat[18]”: a built-in advantage that keeps competitors out.
His firm’s latest move signals they see Google’s moat as widening in the generative-AI era.
Two alligators in Google’s moat
Google won the search engine wars[19] of the late 1990s because it excelled in two key areas: reducing search cost and navigating the law.
Over the years, those advantages have acted like alligators in Google’s moat, keeping competitors at bay.
Google understood earlier and better than anyone that reducing search cost – the time and effort to find reliable information – was the internet’s core economic opportunity.
Company founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page started with a revolutionary search algorithm[22]. But the real innovation was the business model that followed: giving away search for free, then auctioning off highly targeted advertising beside the results.
Google Ads[23] now brings in tens of billions[24] of dollars a year for Alphabet.
But establishing that business model[25] wasn’t easy. Google had to weave its way through pre-internet intellectual property law[26] and global anxiety about change[27].
The search giant has fended off actions over copyright and trademarks[28] and managed international regulatory attention[29], while protecting its brand from scandals[30].
These business superpowers will matter as generative AI mutates how we search[31] and brings a new wave of scrutiny over intellectual property[32].
Berkshire Hathaway likely sees Google’s track record in these areas as an advantage rivals cannot easily copy.
What if the AI bubble bursts?
Perhaps the genius of Berkshire’s investment is recognising that if the AI bubble bursts, it could bring down some of the “magnificent seven” tech leaders – but perhaps not its most durable members.
Consumer-facing giants like Google and Apple would probably weather an AI crash well. Google’s core advertising business[33] sailed through the global financial crisis of 2008, the COVID crash, and the inflationary bear market of 2022.
By contrast, newer “megacaps[34]” like Nvidia may struggle in a downturn.
Read more: Could a 'grey swan' event bring down the AI revolution? Here are 3 risks we should be preparing for[35]
Plenty could still go wrong
There’s no guarantee Google will be able to capitalise on the new economics of AI, especially with so many ongoing intellectual property and regulatory risks[36].
Google’s brand, like Buffett, could just get old[37]. Younger people are using search engines less, with more using AI or social media[38] to get their answers.
New tech, such as “agentic shopping”[39] or “recommender systems”[40], can increasingly bypass search altogether.
But with its rivers of online advertising gold, experience back to the dawn of the commercial internet, and capacity to use its platforms to nurture new habits among its vast user base, Alphabet is far from a bad bet.
Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not take into account your personal objectives, financial situation, or needs. It is not intended as financial advice. All investments carry risk.
References
- ^ reported record $US57 billion (nvidianews.nvidia.com)
- ^ calmed global investors’ jitters (www.wsj.com)
- ^ bubble bursting (theconversation.com)
- ^ more than $US5 trillion (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ magnificent seven (www.investopedia.com)
- ^ Nvidia stocks (www.nasdaq.com)
- ^ sold its entire stake (www.reuters.com)
- ^ Warren Buffett (theconversation.com)
- ^ quarterly filing (www.sec.gov)
- ^ sold down its massive Apple position (www.reuters.com)
- ^ Buffett is about to step down (www.bbc.com)
- ^ many winners (www.businessinsider.com)
- ^ investment in IBM (www.wired.com)
- ^ Masayoshi Son (www.morningstar.com)
- ^ exiting Nvidia (finance.yahoo.com)
- ^ “Oracle of Omaha” (ngcbgroup.com)
- ^ investment philosophy (www.cnbc.com)
- ^ economic moat (www.investopedia.com)
- ^ search engine wars (www.economist.com)
- ^ Joi Ito/Wikimedia Commons (commons.wikimedia.org)
- ^ CC BY (creativecommons.org)
- ^ revolutionary search algorithm (www.technologyreview.com)
- ^ Google Ads (support.google.com)
- ^ tens of billions (www.statista.com)
- ^ that business model (www.ebsco.com)
- ^ pre-internet intellectual property law (doi.org)
- ^ anxiety about change (www.sbs.com.au)
- ^ actions over copyright and trademarks (en.wikipedia.org)
- ^ regulatory attention (www.cnbc.com)
- ^ scandals (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ mutates how we search (theconversation.com)
- ^ intellectual property (www.oecd.org)
- ^ core advertising business (www.marketingdive.com)
- ^ megacaps (www.investopedia.com)
- ^ Could a 'grey swan' event bring down the AI revolution? Here are 3 risks we should be preparing for (theconversation.com)
- ^ risks (www.economist.com)
- ^ just get old (www.wsj.com)
- ^ using AI or social media (searchengineland.com)
- ^ “agentic shopping” (theconversation.com)
- ^ “recommender systems” (www.esafety.gov.au)
