The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

the 30-year history of Australia’s climate response, in brief

  • Written by Kate Crowley, Associate Professor, Public and Environmental Policy, University of Tasmania

Time is rapidly running out for the Morrison government to announce a new climate policy before the United Nations COP26 climate talks in Glasgow next month. At the 11th hour, the government appears poised to announce a net-zero emissions target for 2050 and, possibly, stronger ambition to 2030.

Infamously, Australia has to date failed to sustain a meaningful climate policy regime. As my latest research[1] has shown, inaction by the federal government has been a particularly effective handbrake on progress. So any new climate targets, and a robust plan to meet them, would be welcome.

The challenge now for the Morrison government is to consign Australia’s fractious climate politics divide to history. The mistakes of the past must be avoided. A new approach is needed, one that delivers on net-zero, with a 2030 target that signals Australia’s intent to join the world in taking climate change seriously.

There is much to learn from analysis of Australia’s poor record, in particular from the divisive “climate wars” which plagued federal politics over the last decade. But Australia’s policy recalcitrance stretches way back, at least 30 years.

To help us understand what’s at stake for Australia at Glasgow and beyond, here’s a quick refresher.

Cast your mind back 30 years

In her detailed history[2] of climate awareness in Australia, academic and journalist Maria Taylor found, through document and interview-based analysis, that as far back as the late 1980s, the Australian public was the best informed on the planet of the urgent need to act on global warming.

She recalls the Hawke Labor government set a target of reducing emissions 20% below 1988 levels by 2005. However, the impetus was lost under the Keating Labor government as the economic recession hit[3], and concerns about the cost of climate action grew – in particular from the resources industry.

Scott Morrison holds a lump of coal in Parliament
30 years of inaction has left Australia lagging without a long-term target. AAP Image/Mick Tsikas

The late 1990s, under the Howard Coalition government, were also lost to inaction. At the 1997 Kyoto climate negotiations, Australia demanded[4] a target that allowed[5] emissions in 2012 to be 8% more than they were in 1990, while developed nations, other than Norway and Iceland, agreed to cut theirs. Australia threatened to walk away[6] from the negotiations if that was not agreed to.

Despite Australia’s demands being met, the Howard government then failed to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, the only[7] developed nation other than the United States to do so.

It did introduce a renewable energy target and propose a carbon tax, prior to losing the 2007 election, as an Australian public gripped by drought sought stronger action on climate change.

Reporters crowd in front of a TV screen airing a press conference at the UN climate change conference in Kyoto, December 9, 1997. AP Photo/Katsumi Kasahara

The Rudd Labor government ratified[8] the Kyoto Protocol in 2007. It also attempted to set a carbon price, in the form of the Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS). But the bill failed[9] to pass Parliament after the Coalition and the Greens blocked it in the Senate.

In 2011, the Gillard Labor minority government passed the Clean Energy Act[10] negotiated with her crossbench supporters. This established a carbon pricing mechanism, which critics wrongly branded[11] a “carbon tax”.

Read more: 25 years ago the Australian government promised deep emissions cuts, and yet here we still are[12]

The Abbott years

The Coalition opposition, led by Tony Abbott, was circling. Ever the climate policy pugilist[13], Abbott pledged to “axe the tax[14]” and repeal other climate policy advances. At the 2013 federal election, he rode those promises into office.

The Abbott government was the first in the world to repeal a carbon price[15]. Gone also were other advances[16], such as the expert Climate Commission, support for wind and solar power, and policies to promote energy efficiency.

Members of Greenpeace follow John Howard on his morning walk, 2004, protesting Howard’s refusal to ratify the Kyoto Protocol on climate change. AP Photo/Greenpeace,Hand Out

The new government’s dismantling closed Australia’s window of opportunity to act on climate change. But the world was moving on. By 2015 international leaders were calling for[17] an end to coal and for steep policy action under the Paris Agreement.

Abbott was deposed as prime minister in 2015 after two years in office. But his dismantling efforts dramatically slowed the transition from fossil fuels to clean energy, which was progressing apace[18] in other advanced industrial economies.

Abbott’s successor, Malcolm Turnbull, understood this. But his efforts to move on climate change were thwarted by internal party politics and dissent, and in 2018 he too was deposed[19].

It’s up to Scott Morrison

Given this tumultuous history, Prime Minister Scott Morrison has been cautious not to signal[20] abrupt climate policy change. But now, with the international summit just weeks away, he is staring down the Coalition’s naysayers[21] in the National Party to pledge a target of net-zero emissions by 2050.

Up to 1,000 protesters take to the streets of Sydney to protest the government’s so-called carbon tax, 2011. AAP Image/Dean Lewins

The political conversation on climate change is finally changing. Even the conservative federal Treasurer Josh Frydenberg recently articulated[22] the economic costs of not making the low-emissions transition.

But 30 years of inaction has left Australia lagging without a long-term target or an effective 2030 target to guide interim action, including a phase-out of coal. So Australia risks being left behind[23], missing out on the jobs and growth from a low-carbon transition.

Read more: What is COP26 and why does the fate of Earth, and Australia's prosperity, depend on it?[24]

To see bone fide change in Australia’s climate response, the government must not repeat the mistakes of the past: politicising climate change, delaying the clean energy transition, persisting with ineffective policies, and offsetting rather than reducing emissions.

Instead, it should set partisanship aside and develop enduring economic and energy transition plans for affected communities, such as those vulnerable to drought, low-lying coastal communities, and coal workers set to lose their jobs. These plans mustn’t be reversed for political gain, as we’ve seen in the past.

Jurisdictions such as the European Union are planning or considering trade sanctions such as carbon border adjustments[25] on nations that don’t reduce emissions. And stranded fossil fuel investments[26] are inevitable as the market shifts towards renewables. Clearly, inaction on climate change will cost Australia[27] dearly.

References

  1. ^ my latest research (wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  2. ^ detailed history (press-files.anu.edu.au)
  3. ^ economic recession hit (www.theguardian.com)
  4. ^ Australia demanded (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  5. ^ allowed (mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com)
  6. ^ walk away (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ the only (www.theage.com.au)
  8. ^ ratified (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  9. ^ failed (www.abc.net.au)
  10. ^ Clean Energy Act (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  11. ^ branded (www.sbs.com.au)
  12. ^ 25 years ago the Australian government promised deep emissions cuts, and yet here we still are (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ climate policy pugilist (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ axe the tax (www.theaustralian.com.au)
  15. ^ repeal a carbon price (www.newscientist.com)
  16. ^ other advances (wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  17. ^ calling for (www.smh.com.au)
  18. ^ progressing apace (us.macmillan.com)
  19. ^ deposed (reneweconomy.com.au)
  20. ^ not to signal (www.theguardian.com)
  21. ^ staring down the Coalition’s naysayers (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ recently articulated (theconversation.com)
  23. ^ left behind (climateactiontracker.org)
  24. ^ What is COP26 and why does the fate of Earth, and Australia's prosperity, depend on it? (theconversation.com)
  25. ^ carbon border adjustments (reneweconomy.com.au)
  26. ^ stranded fossil fuel investments (www.reuters.com)
  27. ^ will cost Australia (www.climatecouncil.org.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/climate-wars-carbon-taxes-and-toppled-leaders-the-30-year-history-of-australias-climate-response-in-brief-169545

The Times Features

48 Hours in Hobart: The Ultimate Weekend Itinerary

Nestled between the towering Mount Wellington and the sparkling waters of the Derwent River, Hobart is a charming city that offers an intriguing blend of natural beauty, rich histo...

Lunchtime Facelifts: Quick & Effective Procedures for Busy Professionals

Busy professionals often find themselves juggling demanding careers, family obligations, and social commitments. With such a tight schedule, it can be difficult to make time for ...

Visual Guide to Distinguishing Ants from Termites

Distinguishing ants from termites is crucial for homeowners who wish to protect their properties from structural damage. These tiny creatures, though seemingly unthreatening, can...

‘Active recovery’ after exercise is supposed to improve performance – but does it really work?

Imagine you have just finished a workout. Your legs are like jelly, your lungs are burning and you just want to collapse on the couch. But instead, you pick yourself up and ...

Plumber Rates In Canberra: What You Need To Know Before You Hire

When plumbing issues arise, most homeowners in Canberra have one major question: How much will a plumber cost? Whether it’s a leaking tap, a burst pipe, or a full bathroom renova...

Having an x-ray to diagnose knee arthritis might make you more likely to consider potentially unnecessary surgery

Osteoarthritis is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability, affecting more than two million Australians[1]. Routine x-rays aren’t recommended[2] to diagnose the condit...

Times Magazine

First Nations Writers Festival

The First Nations Writers Festival (FNWF) is back for its highly anticipated 2025 edition, continuing its mission to celebrate the voices, cultures and traditions of First Nations communities through literature, art and storytelling. Set to take ...

Improving Website Performance with a Cloud VPS

Websites represent the new mantra of success. One slow website may make escape for visitors along with income too. Therefore it's an extra offer to businesses seeking better performance with more scalability and, thus represents an added attracti...

Why You Should Choose Digital Printing for Your Next Project

In the rapidly evolving world of print media, digital printing has emerged as a cornerstone technology that revolutionises how businesses and creative professionals produce printed materials. Offering unparalleled flexibility, speed, and quality, d...

What to Look for When Booking an Event Space in Melbourne

Define your event needs early to streamline venue selection and ensure a good fit. Choose a well-located, accessible venue with good transport links and parking. Check for key amenities such as catering, AV equipment, and flexible seating. Pla...

How BIM Software is Transforming Architecture and Engineering

Building Information Modeling (BIM) software has become a cornerstone of modern architecture and engineering practices, revolutionizing how professionals design, collaborate, and execute projects. By enabling more efficient workflows and fostering ...

How 32-Inch Computer Monitors Can Increase Your Workflow

With the near-constant usage of technology around the world today, ergonomics have become crucial in business. Moving to 32 inch computer monitors is perhaps one of the best and most valuable improvements you can possibly implement. This-sized moni...

LayBy Shopping