The Times Australia
Mirvac Harbourside
The Times World News

.

Choosing a new doctor? Their sexual misconduct may soon be on the record

  • Written by Christopher Rudge, Law lecturer, University of Sydney
Choosing a new doctor? Their sexual misconduct may soon be on the record

Over the past decade, reports of sexual misconduct by Australian health practitioners against patients have increased[1]. While various reforms[2] have tried to curtail “sexual boundary violations”, none has worked.

Now, Australian health ministers have agreed[3] to consider three amendments[4] intended to protect patients in each state and territory.

Where past reforms have tinkered with the disciplinary powers[5] regulators have to sanction health professionals[6], these new proposals take a different tack.

They seek to reorient the “inherent power imbalance[7]” between practitioner and patient, in favour of patients. The aim is to increase public information about previously sanctioned practitioners and to better protect those who complain.

Read more: How can the health regulator better protect patients from sexual misconduct?[8]

What are boundary violations?

In health-care regulation, health practitioners’ boundary violations (or boundary crossings) cover a spectrum of sexual transgressions against patients.

These obviously include serious or criminal sexual assaults and exploitation. However, they also cover innuendo, intrusive questions and inappropriate physical examinations. Then there are sexual relationships with former[9] and current patients – consensual or not.

Young woman in therapy session with female therapist, both anonymous
Boundary violations cover a range of behaviours, including innuendo and intrusive questions. Ground Picture/Shutterstock[10]

The Medical Board of Australia’s guidelines for sexual boundaries[11] describes how boundary violations breach patient trust, undermine patient safety, and erode public confidence in the medical profession.

As much[12] research[13] indicates, patients who are violated while seeking health care may endure[14] profound distress and experience lifelong trauma.

Read more: A doctor's sexual advances towards a patient are never ok, even if 'consensual'[15]

How common are boundary violations?

Research with patients[16] indicates boundary violations in health care are[17] under-reported[18].

Still, Australia’s national regulator of health practitioners, known as Ahpra, received[19] 841 notifications about 728 registered practitioners concerning boundary violations in 2022-2023. This is an increase of more than 220% from 2019-2020.

Of these notifications, 359 related to medical practitioners (including psychiatrists), while 215 related to nurses and 120 to psychologists.

Independent analysis of Australian tribunal cases for boundary violations indicates between roughly 65% and 80%[20] of those accused are male.

Read more: Rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment: what’s the difference?[21]

Why now?

As reported boundary violations have surged, public interest in the issue and its impacts has sharpened.

Media reports have described practitioners engaged in exploitative sexual[22] relationships[23], as well as inappropriate touching[24] and physical examinations[25].

Meanwhile, public inquiries have spotlighted the regulator’s role and responsibilities.

For instance, Tasmania’s inquiry[26] into child sexual abuse examined evidence[27] of Ahpra’s response to sexual abuse by a paediatric nurse[28]. The National Health Practitioner Ombudsman[29]’s review[30] found protections for complainants should be strengthened.

At the same time, several[31] rigorous[32] Australian[33] studies[34] have highlighted regulatory weak spots and proposed options for reform.

Here is what is on the table.

1. More public information about past violations

This proposed reform would allow Ahpra to disclose the “full regulatory history” of any health professional found guilty of professional misconduct for sexual violations in a civil tribunal or found guilty of sexual offences in a criminal court.

This would raise “red flags” on the public register about certain practitioners, which a patient could access.

Currently, regulatory impositions – such as practice conditions, reprimands, suspensions or deregistrations – are recorded on the register but usually removed once they lapse or expire.

2. Consistent reinstatement of deregistered practitioners

This seeks to harmonise across the country how deregistered health practitioners are reinstated.

Currently, only New South Wales law requires disqualified health practitioners to obtain a “reinstatement order[35]” from a civil tribunal before applying to the relevant health profession council for reinstatement. The tribunal’s deliberations are heard in open hearings, its reasons and decision published to the public, and in turn may be reported by the media and read by patients.

Elsewhere, the state health practitioner boards typically reinstate practitioners without any publicly available decision, or the reasons behind the decision.

3. Banning non-disclosure agreements

The 2022 independent investigation into cosmetic surgery practitioners[36] in Australia revealed some doctors who resolved disputes privately with aggrieved patients had used non-disclosure or confidentiality agreements, presumably to shield themselves from liability.

While such agreements would likely[37] be unenforceable[38], they may lead patients to falsely believe they are legally bound to silence.

This proposed reform seeks to prohibit health practitioners using non-disclosure agreements to eliminate any chance they might stop or dissuade patients from reporting misconduct.

Man signing paper document with pen Proposed changes would ban health practitioners from trying to stop patients from reporting them. KellySHUTSTOC/Shutterstock[39]

What would the proposed changes mean?

Many publicised[40] boundary violation cases[41] involve practitioners who have been reinstated after disqualification for previous misconduct. This includes where they have changed their names[42].

Currently, many patients who have been harmed by serial offenders have no way of knowing a practitioner had been previously sanctioned for the same or similar misconduct.

Data on repeat offending are patchy[43]. However, analysis[44] of the available Australian data indicates repeat offending is “the norm rather than the exception[45]”.

While some health practitioners will see these reforms as oppressive or punitive, only those found guilty in an open tribunal or court of the most serious professional misconduct for boundary-crossing transgressions or sexual crimes would be affected.

While promising, the reforms are not laid in stone. Public consultation is now underway[46] until February 19.

References

  1. ^ increased (www.ahpra.gov.au)
  2. ^ various reforms (www.nhpo.gov.au)
  3. ^ have agreed (www.abc.net.au)
  4. ^ three amendments (engage.vic.gov.au)
  5. ^ the disciplinary powers (documents.parliament.qld.gov.au)
  6. ^ sanction health professionals (classic.austlii.edu.au)
  7. ^ inherent power imbalance (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  8. ^ How can the health regulator better protect patients from sexual misconduct? (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ former (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  10. ^ Ground Picture/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  11. ^ guidelines for sexual boundaries (www.medicalboard.gov.au)
  12. ^ much (journals.sagepub.com)
  13. ^ research (doi.org)
  14. ^ endure (psycnet.apa.org)
  15. ^ A doctor's sexual advances towards a patient are never ok, even if 'consensual' (theconversation.com)
  16. ^ Research with patients (doctors.ajc.com)
  17. ^ are (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  18. ^ under-reported (law.unimelb.edu.au)
  19. ^ received (www.ahpra.gov.au)
  20. ^ 65% and 80% (law.unimelb.edu.au)
  21. ^ Rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment: what’s the difference? (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ exploitative sexual (www.abc.net.au)
  23. ^ relationships (www.geelongadvertiser.com.au)
  24. ^ touching (www.abc.net.au)
  25. ^ physical examinations (www.abc.net.au)
  26. ^ inquiry (www.commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au)
  27. ^ evidence (www.commissionofinquiry.tas.gov.au)
  28. ^ paediatric nurse (www.abc.net.au)
  29. ^ National Health Practitioner Ombudsman (www.nhpo.gov.au)
  30. ^ review (www.nhpo.gov.au)
  31. ^ several (law.unimelb.edu.au)
  32. ^ rigorous (www.mja.com.au)
  33. ^ Australian (www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au)
  34. ^ studies (journals.sagepub.com)
  35. ^ reinstatement order (legislation.nsw.gov.au)
  36. ^ cosmetic surgery practitioners (www.ahpra.gov.au)
  37. ^ likely (www.ahpra.gov.au)
  38. ^ unenforceable (www5.austlii.edu.au)
  39. ^ KellySHUTSTOC/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  40. ^ publicised (www.abc.net.au)
  41. ^ cases (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au)
  42. ^ changed their names (www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au)
  43. ^ patchy (researchspace.auckland.ac.nz)
  44. ^ analysis (doi.org)
  45. ^ the norm rather than the exception (doi.org)
  46. ^ underway (engage.vic.gov.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/choosing-a-new-doctor-their-sexual-misconduct-may-soon-be-on-the-record-223082

Mirvac Harbourside

Times Magazine

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data anal...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right c...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in t...

The Times Features

Noticing These 5 Issues? Contact an Emergency Plumber Now

The invisible arteries running through homes, plumbing systems, streamline daily life discreetly...

The Perfect Champagne Day Pairing: Luke Nguyen’s Chargrilled Lemongrass Beef Skewers

Celebrate Champagne Day on October 24th with this delicious recipe and elegant pairing from Luke Ngu...

Bribing kids to eat vegetables might backfire. Here’s what to do instead

It’s a tactic many parents know well: “eat two bites of broccoli, and then you can have desser...

Common Wall Mounting Challenges and How Professionals Solve Them

It is not always as easy as it seems to mount artwork, shelves, or TVs, since some difficulties are ...

Understanding Centrelink Investment Property Valuation: A Guide for Australian Property Owners

Introduction Owning an investment property in Australia can bring financial stability — but it al...

The climate crisis is fuelling extreme fires across the planet

We’ve all seen the alarming images. Smoke belching from the thick forests[1] of the Amazon. Sp...

Applications open for Future Cotton Leaders Program 2026

Applications have opened for the 2026 intake for the Australia Future Cotton Leaders Program (AFCL...

Optimising is just perfectionism in disguise. Here’s why that’s a problem

If you regularly scroll health and wellness content online, you’ve no doubt heard of optimisin...

Macquarie Bank Democratises Agentic AI, Scaling Customer Innovation with Gemini Enterprise

Macquarie’s Banking and Financial Services group (Macquarie Bank), in collaboration with Google ...