Australia's government gives more support to fossil fuel research than is apparent
- Written by Will McDowall, Associate Professor, UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, UCL
Australian governments direct billions to fossil fuel companies. Among the projects funded by Commonwealth and state governments are work on coal ports, railways and power stations, and research into “clean coal” or “coal innovation”.
Whether worthwhile or not, this funding is visible and can be debated on its merits, as The Australia Institute has done in a study characterising total government support for fossil fuel industries as hitting A$10.3 billion[1] in 2020-21.
But there’s more that’s invisible. Research I have just published in the journal Environmental Research Letters[2] using new administrative data from tax offices finds Australia has spent more subsidising fossil fuel research indirectly via research and development tax credits than directly via grants.
Between 2012 and 2018 fossil fuel extraction companies received A$1.4 billion in research and development tax credits from the Australian government.
My study examines the R&D tax concessions taken up in Canada, Australia, Norway and the United Kingdom.
Support through tax concessions is near-invisible
Each country has committed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. All are part of the international Mission Innovation[3] initiative, which aims to accelerate the development and diffusion of low-carbon technologies.
The tax data provided was the value of R&D tax credits received by companies whose principal classification code is, or has recently been, related to fossil fuel extraction.
Read more: 'A dose of reality': Morrison government's new $1.9 billion techno-fix for climate change is a small step[4]
Because some of these grants might have been used to support research into renewable or carbon sequestration technologies, I have also examined the nature of the patents published by those companies in the countries where it is available.
Of the 9,398 patents filed by UK and Norwegian fossil fuel extraction firms between 2012 and 2018, only 3% are related to climate mitigation. I was unable to obtain figures for Australia.
Most patents claimed by fossil fuel extraction companies are for fossil fuels
Number of patents filed between 2012 and 2019 by UK and Norwegian firms whose principal activity is fossil fuel extraction.
McDowall 2021[5]
This generous support of fossil fuel innovation through R&D tax credits is unlikely to be deliberate. It is an artefact of the design of Australia’s R&D tax incentive scheme, which is unusually generous to large companies.
But it amounts to a surprisingly big amount, and longer term could be bigger still.
Much support is banked for future use
Australia’s credits can be “carried forward” to reduce future tax bills.
In 2018, the most recent year for which data was available, Australian fossil fuel companies were holding on to A$880 million in R&D tax credits that could be used in future years on top of what they had claimed.
That’s in addition to the A$1.4 billion already received, for a total of well over A$2 billion. It’s a substantial well-hidden public investment in fossil fuel R&D.
Australian fossil fuel companies are amassing credits to carry forward
McDowall 2021[6]
Although done rarely, it is possible to design R&D tax concessions differently.
Between 2003 and 2017, the UK offered a higher rate of R&D tax credits for research on vaccines, malaria, tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS. Several states in the United States offer higher R&D tax credits for research on particular technologies.
Read more:
‘The good, the bad and the ugly’: here's the lowdown on Australia’s low-emissions roadmap[7]
A better and more open approach would be to replace R&D tax concessions for fossil fuel research with direct grants for lines of research that might help Australia meet its emission reduction commitments.
Research into cheaper ways of producing fossil fuels will be counter-productive to those efforts. It will create the need for higher carbon prices or other measures[8] down the track to re-tilt the playing field.
References
- ^ A$10.3 billion (australiainstitute.org.au)
- ^ Environmental Research Letters (iopscience.iop.org)
- ^ Mission Innovation (www.mission-innovation.net)
- ^ 'A dose of reality': Morrison government's new $1.9 billion techno-fix for climate change is a small step (theconversation.com)
- ^ McDowall 2021 (iopscience.iop.org)
- ^ McDowall 2021 (iopscience.iop.org)
- ^ ‘The good, the bad and the ugly’: here's the lowdown on Australia’s low-emissions roadmap (theconversation.com)
- ^ other measures (www.aeaweb.org)
Authors: Will McDowall, Associate Professor, UCL Institute for Sustainable Resources, UCL
