The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

Is it a crime to forge a vaccine card? And what’s the penalty for using a fake?

  • Written by Christopher Robertson, Professor of Law, Boston University

Schools, businesses, the military and local governments are requiring proof of vaccination. Yet, unlike the European Union and Australia, which have secure digital proof of vaccination[1], the United States has not created a systematic way to track vaccinations around the nation. Most places in the U.S. instead rely on paper cards with handwritten notes, which can be easily forged.

As scholars of health law[2] and criminal law[3], we know[4] that people who forge their own vaccine cards, or buy forged cards, are already facing criminal charges.

Federal prosecutors have already brought criminal charges[5] against a naturopathic doctor in northern California. In a case involving a licensed pharmacist in Chicago, prosecutors argued that selling official vaccination cards to people who were not really vaccinated effectively stole something from the government[6], by giving it to others without the government’s permission.

This isn’t an entirely new phenomenon. For many years, it has been a federal crime[7] to make or use “any materially false writing in any matter involving a health care benefit program.”

What is the harm?

When people are caught knowingly buying, selling or using false cards, the proof of guilt will often be clear. The real question is about the appropriate punishment.

Some of the relevant laws, such as wire and mail fraud, have penalties of up to $250,000 and 20 years’ imprisonment for each email, website visit, call or package sent as part of the scheme. These charges can add up, so that a person who sent an email requesting the card, used Venmo to pay for it, then received it in the mail could face 60 years of imprisonment and $750,000 in fines.

But in practice, the law gives prosecutors and judges huge discretion[8] on how to charge and sentence offenders. Typically, judges consider the degree of harm caused or at least the value of the thing that was wrongly acquired. In the case of forged vaccine cards, that is a thorny question.

A laminated document This forged COVID-19 vaccination card was seized during a criminal investigation in California. California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control via AP[9]

A fake vaccination card deceives universities, businesses and employers into granting access they otherwise would not, letting someone use land, buildings or equipment they otherwise would be barred from. In some cases, such as those involving an astronomy researcher supported by federal grants or athletes in bowl games, that access might be worth thousands of dollars. More importantly, that fraudulent access might risk the health of students, clients and staffers who rely on vaccination policies for their own safety.

Prosecutors don’t need to prove that someone was infected or died as a result of a particular person’s use of a fake vaccine card at a specific place and time. The fake card user’s intent to violate trust is sufficient to make the act a crime.

Counterfeiting is serious

Aside from the institutions and individuals defrauded, the social harm is obvious. Like counterfeit money or forged checks, a fake vaccination card undermines the public’s faith in all vaccination cards. If a sizable number of documents were illegitimate, people would be unable to trust any of them.

Punishment in money counterfeiting cases[10], quite logically, often tracks the value of fake currency possessed. In June 2021, two Maryland men were sentenced to 37 months in prison for creating and passing $95,000 in counterfeit bills[11]. But in other cases, the Supreme Court has said that a series of even minor financial frauds[12], amounting to less than $250 in total losses can lead to life imprisonment.

So far, no one has been sentenced for creating or possessing fake COVID-19 vaccination cards. It is therefore not clear how courts will evaluate the harm done by this sort of fraud.

Nonetheless, whether the harm is conceived as against the government, against the particular people who rely on cards, or against social trust, it is clear that prosecutors and judges have sizable penalties they can hand down.

References

  1. ^ secure digital proof of vaccination (www.bbc.com)
  2. ^ health law (www.bu.edu)
  3. ^ criminal law (www.duq.edu)
  4. ^ know (scholar.google.com)
  5. ^ criminal charges (www.nbcbayarea.com)
  6. ^ effectively stole something from the government (www.justice.gov)
  7. ^ federal crime (www.law.cornell.edu)
  8. ^ discretion (papers.ssrn.com)
  9. ^ California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control via AP (newsroom.ap.org)
  10. ^ Punishment in money counterfeiting cases (guidelines.ussc.gov)
  11. ^ 37 months in prison for creating and passing $95,000 in counterfeit bills (www.justice.gov)
  12. ^ even minor financial frauds (scholar.google.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/is-it-a-crime-to-forge-a-vaccine-card-and-whats-the-penalty-for-using-a-fake-166788

Times Magazine

Q&A with Freya Alexander – the young artist transforming co-working spaces into creative galleries

As the current Artist in Residence at Hub Australia, Freya Alexander is bringing colour and creativi...

This Christmas, Give the Navman Gift That Never Stops Giving – Safety

Protect your loved one’s drives with a Navman Dash Cam.  This Christmas don’t just give – prote...

Yoto now available in Kmart and The Memo, bringing screen-free storytelling to Australian families

Yoto, the kids’ audio platform inspiring creativity and imagination around the world, has launched i...

Kool Car Hire

Turn Your Four-Wheeled Showstopper into Profit (and Stardom) Have you ever found yourself stand...

EV ‘charging deserts’ in regional Australia are slowing the shift to clean transport

If you live in a big city, finding a charger for your electric vehicle (EV) isn’t hard. But driv...

How to Reduce Eye Strain When Using an Extra Screen

Many professionals say two screens are better than one. And they're not wrong! A second screen mak...

The Times Features

5 Ways to Protect an Aircraft

Keeping aircraft safe from environmental damage and operational hazards isn't just good practice...

Are mental health issues genetic? New research identifies brain cells linked to depression

Scientists from McGill University and the Douglas Institute recently published new research find...

What do we know about climate change? How do we know it? And where are we headed?

The 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (sometimes referred to as COP30) is taking pla...

The Industry That Forgot About Women - Until Now

For years, women in trades have started their days pulling on uniforms made for someone else. Th...

Q&A with Freya Alexander – the young artist transforming co-working spaces into creative galleries

As the current Artist in Residence at Hub Australia, Freya Alexander is bringing colour and creativi...

Indo-Pacific Strength Through Economic Ties

The defence treaty between Australia and Indonesia faces its most difficult test because of econ...

Understanding Kerbside Valuation: A Practical Guide for Property Owners

When it comes to property transactions, not every situation requires a full, detailed valuation. I...

What’s been happening on the Australian stock market today

What moved, why it moved and what to watch going forward. 📉 Market overview The benchmark S&am...

The NDIS shifts almost $27m a year in mental health costs alone, our new study suggests

The National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was set up in 2013[1] to help Australians with...