The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Australia will impose a ‘digital duty of care’ on tech companies to reduce online harm. It’s a good idea – if it can be enforced

  • Written by Lisa M. Given, Professor of Information Sciences & Director, Social Change Enabling Impact Platform, RMIT University

In an escalation of its battle with big tech, the federal government has announced[1] it plans to impose a “digital duty of care” on tech companies to reduce online harms.

The announcement follows the government’s controversial plans to legislate a social media ban[2] for young people under 16 and impose tighter rules[3] on digital platforms such as Google, Facebook, Instagram, X and TikTok to address misinformation and disinformation.

In a speech last night, Minister for Communications Michelle Rowland explained why the government was planning to introduce a digital duty of care:

What’s required is a shift away from reacting to harms by relying on content regulation alone, and moving towards systems-based prevention, accompanied by a broadening of our perspective of what online harms are.

This is a positive step forward and one aligned with other jurisdictions around the world.

What is a ‘digital duty of care’?

Duty of care is a legal obligation to ensure the safety of others. It isn’t limited to just not doing harm; it also means taking reasonable steps to prevent harm.

The proposed digital duty of care will put the onus on tech companies such as Meta, Google and X to protect consumers from harm on their online platforms. It will bring social media platforms in line with companies who make physical products who already have a duty of care to do their best to make sure their products don’t harm users.

The digital duty of care will require tech companies to regularly conduct risk assessments to proactively identify harmful content.

This assessment must consider what Rowland called “enduring categories of harm”, which will also be legislated. Rowland said these categories could include:

  • harms to young people
  • harms to mental wellbeing
  • the instruction and promotion of harmful practices
  • other illegal content, conduct and activity.

This approach was recommended by the recent review of the Online Safety Act[4]. It is something that is already in effect elsewhere around the world, including in the United Kingdom as part of the Online Safety Act[5] and under the European Union’s Digital Services Act[6].

As well as placing the onus on tech companies to protect users of their platforms, these acts also put the power to combat harmful content into the hands of consumers.

For example, in the EU consumers can submit online complaints[7] about harmful material directly to the tech companies, who are legally obliged to act on these complaints. Where a tech company refuses to remove content, users can complain to a Digital Services Coordinator to investigate further. They can even pursue a court resolution if a satisfactory outcome cannot be reached.

The EU act sets out that if tech companies breach their duty of care to consumers, they can face fines of up to 6% of their worldwide annual turnover[8].

The Human Rights Law Centre in Australia supports the idea of a digital duty of care. It says[9] “digital platforms should owe a legislated duty of care to all users”.

Photo of Facebook homepage on a monitor screen through a magnifying glass.
The government’s proposal will put the onus on tech companies such as Facebook to proactively remove harmful material online. Gil C/Shutterstock[10]

Why is it more appropriate than a social media ban?

Several experts[11]including myself[12] – have pointed out problems with the government’s plan to ban people under 16 from social media.

For example, the “one size fits all” age requirement doesn’t consider the different levels of maturity of young people. What’s more, simply banning young people from social media just delays their exposure to harmful content online. It also removes the ability of parents and teachers to engage with children on the platforms and to help them manage potential harms safely.

The government’s proposed “digital duty of care” would address these concerns.

It promises to force tech companies to make the online world safer by removing harmful content, such as images or videos which promote self-harm. It promises to do this without banning young people’s access to potentially beneficial material or online social communities.

A digital duty of care also has the potential to address the problem of misinformation and disinformation.

The fact Australia would be following the lead of international jurisdictions is also significant. This shows big tech there is a unified global push to combat harmful content appearing on platforms by placing the onus of care on the companies instead of on users.

This unified approach makes it much more likely for tech companies to comply with legislation, when multiple countries impose similar controls and have similar content expectations.

Woman in black suit speaking in front of white building. On Wednesday night minister for communications Michelle Rowland announced the government plans to impose a digital duty of care on tech companies. Mick Tsikas/AAP[13]

How will it be enforced?

The Australian government says it will strongly enforce the digital duty of care. As Minister Rowland said last night:

Where platforms seriously breach their duty of care – where there are systemic failures – we will ensure the regulator can draw on strong penalty arrangements.

Exactly what these penalty arrangements will be is yet to be announced. So too is the method by which people could submit complaints to the regulator about harmful content they have seen online and want to be taken down.

A number of concerns about implementation have been raised in the UK[14]. This demonstrates that getting the details right will be crucial to success in Australia and elsewhere. For example, defining what constitutes harm will be an ongoing challenge and may require test cases to emerge through complaints and/or court proceedings.

And as both the EU and UK introduced this legislation only within the past year, the full impact of these laws – including tech companies’ levels of compliance – is not yet known.

In the end, the government’s turn towards placing the onus on the tech companies to remove harmful content, at the source, is welcome. It will make social media platforms a safer place for everyone – young and old alike.

References

  1. ^ the federal government has announced (minister.infrastructure.gov.au)
  2. ^ social media ban (theconversation.com)
  3. ^ impose tighter rules (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ review of the Online Safety Act (minister.infrastructure.gov.au)
  5. ^ Online Safety Act (www.legislation.gov.uk)
  6. ^ Digital Services Act (commission.europa.eu)
  7. ^ submit online complaints (hateaid.org)
  8. ^ face fines of up to 6% of their worldwide annual turnover (digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu)
  9. ^ It says (www.hrlc.org.au)
  10. ^ Gil C/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  11. ^ Several experts (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ including myself (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ Mick Tsikas/AAP (photos.aap.com.au)
  14. ^ been raised in the UK (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/australia-will-impose-a-digital-duty-of-care-on-tech-companies-to-reduce-online-harm-its-a-good-idea-if-it-can-be-enforced-243682

The Times Features

The Benefits of Animal-Assisted Speech Therapy For Children

Speech therapy has long been a standard for supporting children’s communication and emotional development. But what happens when you introduce a furry friend into the process? Th...

The Hidden Dangers of Blocked Drains and the Ultimate Solution for a Hassle-Free Home

Drain blockages are a big hassle to every homeowner and business owner alike. Whether it is a sink in the kitchen or bathroom, a clogged toilet, or a foul smell circulating aroun...

Understanding the Dangers of Ignoring a Gas Leak

Gas leaks are silent threats lurking within both homes and workplaces. A gas leak occurs when natural gas or any other gaseous substance escapes from a pipeline or containment. T...

Can You Sell Your House Privately in Queensland? Here’s How

Selling a house privately in Queensland is entirely possible and can be a cost-effective alternative to using a real estate agent. While agents provide valuable expertise, their co...

Itinerary to Maximize Your Two-Week Adventure in Vietnam and Cambodia

Two weeks may not seem like much, but it’s just the right time for travelers to explore the best of Vietnam and Cambodia. From the bustling streets of Hanoi to the magnificent te...

How to Protect Your Garden Trees from Wind Damage in Australia

In Australia's expansive landscape, garden trees hold noteworthy significance. They not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of our homes but also play an integral role in the local...

Times Magazine

CWU Assistive Tech Hub is Changing Lives: Win a Free Rollator Walker This Easter!

🌟 Mobility. Independence. Community. All in One. This Easter, the CWU Assistive Tech Hub is pleased to support the Banyule community by giving away a rollator walker. The giveaway will take place during the Macleod Village Easter Egg Hunt & Ma...

"Eternal Nurture" by Cara Barilla: A Timeless Collection of Wisdom and Healing

Renowned Sydney-born author and educator Cara Barilla has released her latest book, Eternal Nurture, a profound collection of inspirational quotes designed to support mindfulness, emotional healing, and personal growth. With a deep commitment to ...

How AI-Driven SEO Enhancements Can Improve Headless CMS Content Visibility

Whereas SEO (search engine optimization) is critical in the digital landscape for making connections to content, much of it is still done manually keyword research, metatags, final tweaks at publication requiring a human element that takes extensiv...

Crypto Expert John Fenga Reveals How Blockchain is Revolutionising Charity

One of the most persistent challenges in the charity sector is trust. Donors often wonder whether their contributions are being used effectively or if overhead costs consume a significant portion. Traditional fundraising methods can be opaque, with...

Navigating Parenting Arrangements in Australia: A Legal Guide for Parents

Understanding Parenting Arrangements in Australia. Child custody disputes are often one of the most emotionally charged aspects of separation or divorce. Parents naturally want what is best for their children, but the legal process of determining ...

Blocky Adventures: A Minecraft Movie Celebration for Your Wrist

The Minecraft movie is almost here—and it’s time to get excited! With the film set to hit theaters on April 4, 2025, fans have a brand-new reason to celebrate. To honor the upcoming blockbuster, watchfaces.co has released a special Minecraft-inspir...

LayBy Shopping