The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

A student’s visa has been cancelled for links to ‘weapons of mass destruction’. What’s going on with Australian research security?

  • Written by Brendan Walker-Munro, Senior Lecturer (Law), Southern Cross University
A student’s visa has been cancelled for links to ‘weapons of mass destruction’. What’s going on with Australian research security?

Over the weekend, Queensland University of Technology PhD student Xiaolong Zhu became national news – and not for a good reason[1]. Zhu is a Chinese citizen, and his visa to study in Australia has been denied on the grounds[2] of being “directly or indirectly associated with the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction”.

The story begins in October 2019, when the university offered Zhu[3] a scholarship to undertake a PhD in robotics. His research would focus on how drones navigate in urban environments without access to GPS.

But in June 2020, Zhu was told the foreign minister had ruled him a risk of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, specifically missiles and rockets. That decision may be in part motivated by Zhu’s prior education at Beihang University[4], an institution closely aligned with China’s military and a lead developer of ballistic missiles and stealth aircraft.

Zhu’s appeal is ongoing, and he has done nothing obviously wrong and has not been charged with or convicted of any crime. So why is his story such a big deal? Zhu’s case, the fifth in which a researcher has been barred from the country on suspicion of links to weapons of mass destruction, is just the latest outcome of Australia’s patchy and irregular approach to “research security”.

Australia’s approach to research security

Australia’s approach to protecting certain types of research from national security threats is inconsistent and out of step with that of many of our allies.

The United States[5], United Kingdom[6], Canada[7], the European Union[8] and New Zealand[9] all have national policies on research security. Australia does not.

Read more: Australia risks falling behind allies on research security. Will it take a spy scandal in our universities to catch up?[10]

Instead, we have voluntary University Foreign Interference Taskforce[11] guidelines, first written in 2019 and updated in 2021. These guidelines were originally written before COVID[12], the US–China “chip war”[13] and the announcement of AUKUS[14].

One of Australia’s biggest funders of university research – the Australian Research Council – has only just published a research security framework[15] in the past six months. Our other major research funders, CSIRO and the National Health and Medical Research Council, don’t appear to have anything similar.

At the same time, most, if not all, Australian universities are increasingly turning to foreign funding[16] in response to government cutbacks.

Blunt instruments

At present, the Australian government seems intent on using blunt instruments to regulate research security.

For example, the foreign minister can refuse or cancel a visa[17] if a person poses a risk to security, fails the “good character” test or (as in Zhu’s case) is deemed to be potentially associated with weapons of mass destruction. Since April 2024, the foreign minister can also refuse or cancel visas if the person poses “an unreasonable risk of an unwanted transfer of critical technology[18]”.

Such controls can be incredibly risky when universities are also facing potentially crippling limitations[19] on international student numbers, and where international education is one of Australia’s biggest exports[20].

Australian university researchers also face export controls[21]. They must seek a permit if they share or publish military or “dual use” technology (research with both military and civilian applications[22], such as radar).

Many countries have similar controls, but the definition of “dual use” technologies can be incredibly subjective. In 2012, a Dutch researcher was infamously taken to court[23] after publishing influenza research that allegedly could have been used to make biological weapons.

Universities in Australia are also required to publicly list[24] every arrangement with a foreign government entity. A recent study of these arrangements found a disturbing number of potentially high-risk ventures[25] at our universities.

Disclosure doesn’t appear to stop questionable research associations going ahead[26]. A parliamentary inquiry has even found the public register to be no longer fit for purpose[27].

What Australia could be doing better

There has been a lack of consolidated action on research security.

Two years ago, a parliamentary inquiry[28] heard of sustained and repeated acts of foreign interference at our universities. To date, fewer than a quarter of the committee’s recommendations have been acted upon.

The final report[29] of the Universities Accord, released this year – which Federal Education Minister Jason Clare called[30] “a blueprint for the next decade and beyond” – doesn’t mention research security at all. In fact, it mentions national security only three times in 408 pages.

Another problem is the complete secrecy surrounding these kinds of cases. Had Zhu not appealed, we might never have heard about it.

Neither the government nor the university made substantial public statements about the case[31]. And Zhu himself will probably never even know what information the minister considered to ban him. Instead, the government issued[32] a variety of certificates to protect “lawful methods for preventing, detecting, and investigating breaches or evasions of the law” and “confidential sources”.

Where to from here

Australia could take some lessons from our allies.

In Canada[33], any federal funding involving a “sensitive technology” will be refused if it involves association with anyone on a list of specific organisations. In New Zealand, high-risk research[34] can be secured by the use of encrypted devices, security clearances, and keeping all research data offline. In the US, universities can be fined[35] or even have their funding suspended[36] if they do not comply with disclosure rules.

That said, our universites are unlikely to welcome more regulation. Such rules may infringe on academic freedom – the protection of academics’ rights to pursue risky or controversial topics[37].

Universities already complain they are one of the most “over-regulated” sectors[38] in the country. Worse yet, universities say stifling international competition[39] could stunt our innovation and “leave us worse off”.

But these objections shouldn’t be the end of the story. In 2021, ASIO head Mike Burgess said[40] that “taking a sensible approach to national security risks shouldn’t stop [universities] from getting on with their core roles”.

Three years on, even discussion of this “sensible approach” seems to have fallen by the wayside. It needs to start again – or any “Future Made in Australia[41]” might stall before it even gets started.

References

  1. ^ not for a good reason (www.theaustralian.com.au)
  2. ^ denied on the grounds (www.theaustralian.com.au)
  3. ^ offered Zhu (www.austlii.edu.au)
  4. ^ Beihang University (unitracker.aspi.org.au)
  5. ^ United States (new.nsf.gov)
  6. ^ United Kingdom (www.npsa.gov.uk)
  7. ^ Canada (science.gc.ca)
  8. ^ European Union (eutopia-university.eu)
  9. ^ New Zealand (www.protectivesecurity.govt.nz)
  10. ^ Australia risks falling behind allies on research security. Will it take a spy scandal in our universities to catch up? (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ University Foreign Interference Taskforce (www.education.gov.au)
  12. ^ COVID (www.aph.gov.au)
  13. ^ US–China “chip war” (www.bbc.com)
  14. ^ announcement of AUKUS (www.minister.defence.gov.au)
  15. ^ research security framework (www.arc.gov.au)
  16. ^ turning to foreign funding (www.abc.net.au)
  17. ^ refuse or cancel a visa (classic.austlii.edu.au)
  18. ^ an unreasonable risk of an unwanted transfer of critical technology (www.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  19. ^ potentially crippling limitations (www.msn.com)
  20. ^ international education is one of Australia’s biggest exports (www.smh.com.au)
  21. ^ export controls (www.defence.gov.au)
  22. ^ research with both military and civilian applications (www.lowyinstitute.org)
  23. ^ infamously taken to court (www.science.org)
  24. ^ publicly list (www.foreignarrangements.gov.au)
  25. ^ potentially high-risk ventures (espace.library.uq.edu.au)
  26. ^ questionable research associations going ahead (www.theguardian.com)
  27. ^ no longer fit for purpose (www.aph.gov.au)
  28. ^ parliamentary inquiry (www.aph.gov.au)
  29. ^ final report (www.education.gov.au)
  30. ^ called (ministers.education.gov.au)
  31. ^ substantial public statements about the case (www.theaustralian.com.au)
  32. ^ issued (www.austlii.edu.au)
  33. ^ In Canada (www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca)
  34. ^ high-risk research (www.universitiesnz.ac.nz)
  35. ^ fined (www.msn.com)
  36. ^ funding suspended (www.chronicle.com)
  37. ^ pursue risky or controversial topics (www.education.gov.au)
  38. ^ most “over-regulated” sectors (go8.edu.au)
  39. ^ stifling international competition (www.uts.edu.au)
  40. ^ said (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)
  41. ^ Future Made in Australia (www.abc.net.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/a-students-visa-has-been-cancelled-for-links-to-weapons-of-mass-destruction-whats-going-on-with-australian-research-security-230002

Times Magazine

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Science Behind Reverse Osmosis and Why It Matters

What is reverse osmosis? Reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification process that removes contaminants by forcing water through a semi-permeable membrane. This membrane allows only water molecules to pass through while blocking impurities such as...

Foodbank Queensland celebrates local hero for National Volunteer Week

Stephen Carey is a bit bananas.   He splits his time between his insurance broker business, caring for his young family, and volunteering for Foodbank Queensland one day a week. He’s even run the Bridge to Brisbane in a banana suit to raise mon...

Senior of the Year Nominations Open

The Allan Labor Government is encouraging all Victorians to recognise the valuable contributions of older members of our community by nominating them for the 2025 Victorian Senior of the Year Awards.  Minister for Ageing Ingrid Stitt today annou...

The Times Features

How to Know If You’re Actually on Track for a Comfortable Retirement

Image by Drazen Zigic on Freepik It’s the kind of question that sits in the back of your mind, especially as you tick past your 30s or 40s: Am I actually saving enough for retire...

Onsite Caterer vs a Full Service Venue: 9 important things to explore

Choosing between an external catering company and an all-inclusive venue is a major decision that affects cost, flexibility, food quality, and the overall event experience. Venue...

The Hidden Vision Problem Impacting Mid Life Australians Every Day

New research from Specsavers reveals millions of Australians are living with an undiagnosed condition that could be putting their safety at risk. For many Australians aged 35 ...

Meal Prep as Self-Care? The One Small Habit That Could Improve Your Mood, Focus & Confidence

What if the secret to feeling calmer, more focused, and emotionally resilient wasn’t found in a supplement or self-help book — but in your fridge? That’s the surprising link uncov...

From a Girlfriend’s Moisturiser to a Men’s Skincare Movement: How Two Mates Built Two Dudes

In a men’s skincare market that often feels like a choice between hyper-masculinity and poorly disguised women’s products, Two Dudes stands out. It’s not trying to be macho. It’s n...

The Great Fleecing: Time for Aussies to demand more from their banks

By Anhar Khanbhai, Chief Anti-Fleecing Officer, Wise   As Australians escape the winter chill for Europe’s summer or Southeast Asia’s sun, many don’t realise they’re walking strai...