The Times Australia
The Times News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Australia has a long history of coercing people into work. There are better options than 'dobbing in'

  • Written by Frances Flanagan, Sydney Fellow, Discipline of Work and Organisational Studies, University of Sydney

After heated criticism from several quarters, the federal government last month announced a meagre rise in the JobSeeker payment for people looking for work. But at just $25 more a week, the subsidy remains the second-lowest in the OECD[1].

The government also announced a hotline[2] for employers to “dob in” unemployed people who reject “suitable work”. These reports will contribute evidence that may be used to reduce or stop payments to JobSeeker recipients.

As many have observed, it is a policy with all-too-familiar resonances. A pallet of punitive and stigmatising measures have been rolled out in liberal economies worldwide[3] over the past 40 years. These include drug testing, cashless welfare cards, mandatory job training and a variety of “mutual obligation” requirements.

As many academics[4] have argued, these measures have done much to inflict misery, and little to create jobs or foster a genuine sense of mutuality. They have also propped up the myth that individuals are overwhelmingly responsible for their own wagelessness, regardless of wider labour market conditions.

Has it always been this way?

Read more: First lift JobSeeker, then add on fully-funded unemployment insurance[5]

A long history of coercing people into work

The idea that it is desirable to use the law to coerce people into employment relationships they do not wish to be in has a long history around the world.

To understand it, we need to look to the origins of both labour law and welfare law. The English parliament passed the 1351 Statute of Labourers[6] in the wake of another plague – the Black Death. It required any able-bodied person below the age of 60 to accept any offer of work.

The Old Poor Laws[7], introduced some 250 years later, were a landmark in the early history of welfare provision. They granted parishes the power to offer support to able-bodied people on the condition they could demonstrate they were “deserving”: that is, neither idle, dissolute, lazy, of poor character nor prone to vice. Together, these feudal and early modern laws reflected and encoded the practice of scrutinising the “unwillingness” of the wageless to work.

Australia has a long history of coercing people into work. There are better options than 'dobbing in' After the Black Death, the Statute of Labourers was used to coerce people into work. Pierart dou Tielt/Wikicommons

As the historian John Murphy has argued[8], lawmakers in the Australian colonies were adamant the Australian “new world” would not reproduce the injustices of the old. The colonies vigorously rejected enacting any equivalent of the Poor Law. However, in the context of a sparsely inhabited continent afflicted by labour shortages, colonial laws concerning work were nevertheless highly coercive.

Read more: New finding: boosting JobSeeker wouldn't keep Australians away from paid work[9]

British master and servant legislation[10], which granted employers sweeping powers over employees for absconding, disloyalty and desertion, backed by criminal sanctions, were adopted with even harsher penalties in Australia than in the UK.

The NSW 1828 Servants and Laborers Act[11] provided for up to six months’ imprisonment for absenteeism or desertion: double the penalty of the equivalent UK legislation. In the 19th century, employers didn’t “dob” on workers who declined a job. Rather, they dobbed on workers who left without permission.

In the early 20th century the state intervened in labour markets with a very different objective: to enshrine the pre-conditions of “civilisation”. Justice Higgins’ famous Harvester Judgment[12] required minimum wages calculated on the basis of “the needs of the average employee, regarded as a human being living in a civilised community”, rather than the “higgling of the market”.

In addition to establishing the legal and economic institutions for a “wage earners’ welfare state”, the imperative to break with stigmatising traditions was expressed through campaigns to entrench welfare systems in Australia that did not depend on people proving their poverty and good character as a precondition to accessing collective funds.

Instead, reformers argued welfare should be organised around the principle of contributory insurance. This involved workers, employers and the state compulsorily saving for future needs. Under such a model (which Australia later embraced on a national scale for superannuation) funds could be accessed in times of need without the taint of “charity”.

Enter the Great Depression

These interwar campaigns failed on the whole, with Queensland the only state to pass an Unemployed Workers Insurance Act in 1922[13] under the leadership of “Red Ted” Theodore. As unemployment rates soared over 30%, the plausibility of insurance models as solution to large-scale social need, or a panacea for welfare stigma, faded and the spectre of “deservedness” in welfare provision returned.

Depression-era systems enabled Unemployment Relief Councils to offer “sustenance work” to men below the basic wage. They also offered forms of “relief” that hinged on proof they had not only applied for work but had moved across the district in pursuit of it. Where the master and servant laws had once functioned to keep workers in place, in the 1930s “track rations[14]” policies kept workers on the move.

Australia has a long history of coercing people into work. There are better options than 'dobbing in' During the Great Depression, ‘sustenance work’ was offered to men below the basic wage. National Museum of Australia

The passage of wartime emergency laws added a new dimension to the state’s willingness and powers to intervene in individual employment relationships. These laws were aimed at securing the production of munitions and essential supplies and services.

The Manpower Directorate[15], Women’s Employment Board[16] and National Security (Employment) regulations[17] were used to scrutinise and curtail the movement of skilled workers between jobs. They were also used to keep “desirable” employees with particular employers and in jobs deemed essential.

These initiatives were introduced against a backdrop of Keynesian economics[18], which would expand after the war and drive a commitment to full employment as an economic objective. They would also engender more generous welfare systems, funded from general revenue, which required the needy to show they were “capable and willing to undertake suitable work” with no time limit on benefits or property means test.

‘Dobbing in’ may not have the desired effect

The notion of enlisting employers to “dob in” people unwilling to enter an employment relationship is likely to be ineffective, given the levels of under-employment[19] in the labour market and the negative[20] response the measure received from some employer groups.

Read more: No, people aren’t unemployed because they’re lazy. We should stop teaching children myths about work[21]

It is likely, too, to deepen social division and increase the potential for exploitation of already vulnerable people. It is an illiberal policy, philosophically at odds with the notion that the parties in labour markets should be free to enter and withdraw from contracts as they see fit.

By placing the policy within the longer context of Australia’s 20th-century history of flawed “bold experiments” in regulating work and welfare, though, we can also see there are alternatives to coercing people into employment relationships.

States can actively intervene in labour markets on a principled basis to promote secure work that meets human need. They can pass policies that are designed to ameliorate, rather than inflame, ideas of “deservedness”. They can actively intervene in labour markets on the basis of the pursuit of a wider social “mission[22]”.

It is important not to romanticise these policy initiatives in Australian history. Each one of them simultaneously deepened processes of exclusion for some, while reconfiguring new possibilities of fair treatment for others. Nevertheless, in an age of rising inequality, social fragmentation and climate change, it is worth remembering these experiments, if only as a stimulus to boldly proposing new ones for our times.

References

  1. ^ second-lowest in the OECD (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ announced a hotline (www.smh.com.au)
  3. ^ worldwide (www.upress.umn.edu)
  4. ^ academics (onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.library.sydney.edu.au)
  5. ^ First lift JobSeeker, then add on fully-funded unemployment insurance (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ 1351 Statute of Labourers (www.oxfordreference.com)
  7. ^ Old Poor Laws (www.familysearch.org)
  8. ^ has argued (www.routledge.com)
  9. ^ New finding: boosting JobSeeker wouldn't keep Australians away from paid work (theconversation.com)
  10. ^ master and servant legislation (reviews.history.ac.uk)
  11. ^ 1828 Servants and Laborers Act (jade.io)
  12. ^ famous Harvester Judgment (www.nma.gov.au)
  13. ^ Unemployed Workers Insurance Act in 1922 (catalogue.nla.gov.au)
  14. ^ track rations (www.routledge.com)
  15. ^ Manpower Directorate (www.naa.gov.au)
  16. ^ Women’s Employment Board (workers.labor.net.au)
  17. ^ National Security (Employment) regulations (www.legislation.gov.au)
  18. ^ Keynesian economics (www.imf.org)
  19. ^ under-employment (www.theguardian.com)
  20. ^ negative (www.theguardian.com)
  21. ^ No, people aren’t unemployed because they’re lazy. We should stop teaching children myths about work (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ mission (www.penguin.com.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/australia-has-a-long-history-of-coercing-people-into-work-there-are-better-options-than-dobbing-in-156296

The Times Features

How weight stigma in maternity care harms larger-bodied women and their babies

According to a study from the United States[1], women experience weight stigma in maternity care at almost every visit. We expect this experience to be similar in Australia, ...

10 Ways to Make Money Online and Provide Financial Stability

The possibility of earning money online has reached unprecedented heights. The proper strategy enables anyone to begin earning money. You don't need fancy degrees or special skil...

The Power of Exterior Design: How Facades Influence Property Value

First impressions count when it comes to real estate, and nothing quite sets the tone for a property like its exterior design. A building's facade is more than just an aesthetic ...

The Best Adjustable Bed and Mattress Packages for Comfort

The appropriate bed and mattress are essential for establishing the perfect sleep environment. If you seek a way to upgrade your sleep experience, adjustable bed and mattress pac...

Designing a Modern Home: Features That Will Make Your Dream House Stand Out

Designing your dream home is an exciting journey, and for many, it’s an opportunity to create a space that reflects their personal style, functionality needs, and modern trends. ...

Client Dinners Done Right: Tips for Meaningful Engagement

Client dinners offer more than just a meal—they’re an opportunity to build lasting business relationships in a more personal and relaxed setting. Done well, these dinners can str...

Times Magazine

Top Benefits of Hiring Commercial Electricians for Your Business

When it comes to business success, there are no two ways about it: qualified professionals are critical. While many specialists are needed, commercial electricians are among the most important to have on hand. They are directly involved in upholdin...

The Essential Guide to Transforming Office Spaces for Maximum Efficiency

Why Office Fitouts MatterA well-designed office can make all the difference in productivity, employee satisfaction, and client impressions. Businesses of all sizes are investing in updated office spaces to create environments that foster collaborat...

The A/B Testing Revolution: How AI Optimized Landing Pages Without Human Input

A/B testing was always integral to the web-based marketing world. Was there a button that converted better? Marketing could pit one against the other and see which option worked better. This was always through human observation, and over time, as d...

Using Countdown Timers in Email: Do They Really Increase Conversions?

In a world that's always on, where marketers are attempting to entice a subscriber and get them to convert on the same screen with one email, the power of urgency is sometimes the essential element needed. One of the most popular ways to create urg...

Types of Software Consultants

In today's technology-driven world, businesses often seek the expertise of software consultants to navigate complex software needs. There are several types of software consultants, including solution architects, project managers, and user experienc...

CWU Assistive Tech Hub is Changing Lives: Win a Free Rollator Walker This Easter!

🌟 Mobility. Independence. Community. All in One. This Easter, the CWU Assistive Tech Hub is pleased to support the Banyule community by giving away a rollator walker. The giveaway will take place during the Macleod Village Easter Egg Hunt & Ma...

LayBy Shopping