The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

Thinking objectively about romantic conflicts could lead to fewer future disagreements

  • Written by Lindsey Rodriguez, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of South Florida
Thinking objectively about romantic conflicts could lead to fewer future disagreements

The Research Brief[1] is a short take about interesting academic work.

The big idea

Consciously channeling the perspective of a neutral third party can defuse romantic conflict and prevent future disputes, according to a study of 716 Americans my colleagues and I published in the journal Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice[2].

We surveyed men and women across the U.S. who were living at home with their romantic partner in May 2020 – at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. We asked them to identify a recent disagreement with their partner. Then we randomly assigned them to briefly write about that recent relationship conflict.

We asked half the participants to write about the disagreement from their own perspective. The other half we asked to assume the point of view of an imaginary neutral third party, such as a mutual friend, who had the best intentions for both members of the couple. We also asked them to take this neutral perspective in future disagreements with their partner.

People wrote about a variety of topics, including arguments over money, disagreements about parenting and remote schooling and differences in ways to handle COVID-19 safety precautions.

When we followed up with them 14 days later, those who considered the disagreement from a neutral third party’s perspective reported greater reductions in romantic conflict and aggression than those who continued to view conflict through their own eyes. For example, those who took the new perspective said they had 30% fewer disagreements and 51.3% fewer incidents of relationship aggression – such as yelling or hitting – over the previous two weeks compared with those who thought about the event from their own perspective.

Why it matters

The quality of your close relationships[3] is among the strongest predictors of happiness with your life, and even how long you live[4]. Disagreements and disputes are inevitable given how deeply romantic partners’ lives become intertwined as they navigate daily life together. The fact that conflict exists is less important than how the couple manages it.

Whereas resolving conflicts collaboratively allows couples to live together harmoniously, communicating about disagreements in a combative way can hurt relationships and take a toll on both partners’ mental and physical health.

Romantic conflict, including domestic violence, escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic[5] because of fear and uncertainty about health, jobs and finances as well as orders to stay home[6] as much as possible.

Given the importance of constructively resolving conflict, researchers are seeking ways to help people reduce stress, feel better and live together harmoniously.

We believe that our finding that shifting your perspective about a recent disagreement reduced the frequency, severity and intensity of romantic conflict during an especially challenging time is important. It’s an effective, free exercise that couples can easily implement in everyday life.

We suspect that seeing disagreements in a new light helps people take a step back, let go of their ego or pride and appreciate both sides of the issue, often culminating in identifying a solution that satisfies everyone. Taking a neutral perspective seems to open doors for more understanding and more empathy, and less anxiety and anger.

What’s next

This is just one example of work our team is doing to show that taking a neutral perspective on conflict with others can improve mental[7] and behavioral[8] health as well as the quality of relationships[9].

Now we are experimenting with how to improve the instructions we give the people who participate in our studies about how to reframe their perspectives to see if there are alternatives that work better and last longer. We are also testing downstream effects on partners – that is, whether asking one person in a couple to modify their perspective can affect how their partner approaches conflicts as well.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter[10].]

Read more https://theconversation.com/thinking-objectively-about-romantic-conflicts-could-lead-to-fewer-future-disagreements-165790

Active Wear

Times Magazine

How to Reduce Eye Strain When Using an Extra Screen

Many professionals say two screens are better than one. And they're not wrong! A second screen mak...

Is AI really coming for our jobs and wages? Past predictions of a ‘robot apocalypse’ offer some clues

The robots were taking our jobs – or so we were told over a decade ago. The same warnings are ...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Kindness Tops the List: New Survey Reveals Australia’s Defining Value

Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.  In a time where headlines are dominat...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

The Times Features

Why Every Australian Should Hold Physical Gold and Silver in 2025

In 2025, Australians are asking the same question investors around the world are quietly whisper...

For Young Australians Not Able to Buy City Property Despite Earning Strong Incomes: What Are the Options?

For decades, the message to young Australians was simple: study hard, get a good job, save a dep...

The AI boom feels eerily similar to 2000’s dotcom crash – with some important differences

If last week’s trillion-dollar slide[1] of major tech stocks felt familiar, it’s because we’ve b...

Research uncovering a plant based option for PMS & period pain

With as many as eight in 10 women experiencing period pain, and up to half reporting  premenstru...

Trump presidency and Australia

Is Having Donald Trump as President Beneficial to Australia — and Why? Donald Trump’s return to...

Why Generosity Is the Most Overlooked Business Strategy

When people ask me what drives success, I always smile before answering. Because after two decades...

Some people choosing DIY super are getting bad advice, watchdog warns

It’s no secret Australians are big fans[1] of a do-it-yourself (DIY) project. How many other cou...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Pharmac wants to trim its controversial medicines waiting list – no list at all might be better

New Zealand’s drug-buying agency Pharmac is currently consulting[1] on a change to how it mana...