Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

Thinking objectively about romantic conflicts could lead to fewer future disagreements

  • Written by: Lindsey Rodriguez, Associate Professor of Psychology, University of South Florida
Thinking objectively about romantic conflicts could lead to fewer future disagreements

The Research Brief[1] is a short take about interesting academic work.

The big idea

Consciously channeling the perspective of a neutral third party can defuse romantic conflict and prevent future disputes, according to a study of 716 Americans my colleagues and I published in the journal Couple and Family Psychology: Research and Practice[2].

We surveyed men and women across the U.S. who were living at home with their romantic partner in May 2020 – at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. We asked them to identify a recent disagreement with their partner. Then we randomly assigned them to briefly write about that recent relationship conflict.

We asked half the participants to write about the disagreement from their own perspective. The other half we asked to assume the point of view of an imaginary neutral third party, such as a mutual friend, who had the best intentions for both members of the couple. We also asked them to take this neutral perspective in future disagreements with their partner.

People wrote about a variety of topics, including arguments over money, disagreements about parenting and remote schooling and differences in ways to handle COVID-19 safety precautions.

When we followed up with them 14 days later, those who considered the disagreement from a neutral third party’s perspective reported greater reductions in romantic conflict and aggression than those who continued to view conflict through their own eyes. For example, those who took the new perspective said they had 30% fewer disagreements and 51.3% fewer incidents of relationship aggression – such as yelling or hitting – over the previous two weeks compared with those who thought about the event from their own perspective.

Why it matters

The quality of your close relationships[3] is among the strongest predictors of happiness with your life, and even how long you live[4]. Disagreements and disputes are inevitable given how deeply romantic partners’ lives become intertwined as they navigate daily life together. The fact that conflict exists is less important than how the couple manages it.

Whereas resolving conflicts collaboratively allows couples to live together harmoniously, communicating about disagreements in a combative way can hurt relationships and take a toll on both partners’ mental and physical health.

Romantic conflict, including domestic violence, escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic[5] because of fear and uncertainty about health, jobs and finances as well as orders to stay home[6] as much as possible.

Given the importance of constructively resolving conflict, researchers are seeking ways to help people reduce stress, feel better and live together harmoniously.

We believe that our finding that shifting your perspective about a recent disagreement reduced the frequency, severity and intensity of romantic conflict during an especially challenging time is important. It’s an effective, free exercise that couples can easily implement in everyday life.

We suspect that seeing disagreements in a new light helps people take a step back, let go of their ego or pride and appreciate both sides of the issue, often culminating in identifying a solution that satisfies everyone. Taking a neutral perspective seems to open doors for more understanding and more empathy, and less anxiety and anger.

What’s next

This is just one example of work our team is doing to show that taking a neutral perspective on conflict with others can improve mental[7] and behavioral[8] health as well as the quality of relationships[9].

Now we are experimenting with how to improve the instructions we give the people who participate in our studies about how to reframe their perspectives to see if there are alternatives that work better and last longer. We are also testing downstream effects on partners – that is, whether asking one person in a couple to modify their perspective can affect how their partner approaches conflicts as well.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter[10].]

Read more https://theconversation.com/thinking-objectively-about-romantic-conflicts-could-lead-to-fewer-future-disagreements-165790

Times Magazine

Offshore vs Inshore Centre Console Boats: Which One Should You Buy?

Centre console boats have become one of the most popular choices among modern anglers. Their open ...

Why Australian Enterprises Are Rethinking Their Core Communication Technologies

The corporate landscape in Australia has undergone a permanent structural shift over the past few ...

Road safety risk: New data reveals almost 2 in 3 Australian drivers are letting car maintenance slide as cost of living pressures bite

Australians are putting off vehicle maintenance and new research released on the eve of National R...

Woodroffe footy club BBQ legend crowned in national Bunnings search

Bunnings has found its latest community hero, naming Brent Tanner from Darwin Buffaloes Football C...

VoltX Energy expands into Victoria & ACT to meet surging home battery demand

Leading Australian energy solutions provider VoltX Energy and premier sponsor of the NRL Manly Wa...

Victorian Drivers To Receive 20% Rego Rebate From June 1 In Major Cost-Of-Living Measure

Victorian motorists will begin receiving significant registration savings from June 1 as the Allan...

How Australian Businesses Are Using AI To Cut Costs And Improve Efficiency

Artificial intelligence was once viewed by many small business owners as something futuristic, exp...

Quickest Way of Getting Rid of Your Old Cars in Brisbane?

If you are done searching for a practical solution for quickly getting rid of your old car, this w...

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the Dogs (Literally)

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

The Times Features

Pauline Hanson at the National Press Club: A Defining P…

For almost 30 years, Senator Pauline Hanson has been one of the most recognisable and controversia...

Covid: The pandemic has ended but the health story hasn…

Covid is no longer the daily emergency it was in 2020 and 2021. The fear, lockdowns, border closur...

Macca’s introduces new McSmart range with more choice f…

Macca’s is launching its new-look McSmart range from Wednesday,1 July, with  three new meals at thre...

Why Australia Was Hoping For Another Interest Rate Cut

When the Reserve Bank considers interest rates, the focus is often on inflation, employment and ec...

$100,000 A Year: Where Does That Put You In Australia?

For many Australians, earning $100,000 a year remains an important financial milestone. It is a s...

The Kennedy Center and the Trump Name: A Battle Over Hi…

The removal of Donald Trump's name from part of Washington's famed Kennedy Center has become far m...

The Times Guide to Sydney's Beaches

Winter may still have a grip on Sydney, but anyone who has lived in Australia's largest city knows...

How Australia's Childcare Crisis Is Taking a Toll …

Australian mums and dads are increasingly anxious, exhausted, and distrustful of Australia’s childca...

The Economics of a Cup of Coffee: Is Your Daily Cappucc…

For many Australians, a morning coffee is no longer a luxury. It is a ritual. A quick stop at the ...