The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

Trump Organization indictment hints at downsides of having no independent oversight – unlike companies traded on Wall Street

  • Written by Bert Spector, Associate Professor of International Business and Strategy at the D'Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University

A Manhattan grand jury on July 1, 2021, indicted the Trump Organization[1] and one of its top executives, Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg[2], over his failure to pay taxes over 15 years.

I’m a scholar in corporate leadership and governance[3]. While I can’t comment on the specifics of the case, I do know that private companies like the Trump Organization lack the safeguards of public corporations – like outside ownership and independent oversight.

Moreover, impulsive decision-making by an individual or small, isolated group of followers, without those safeguards, can and often will lead to disastrous results[4].

That appears to be what the ongoing criminal investigations into the Trump Organization show.

Public ownership

Several years ago, I explored the distinction between public and private companies in detail when the American Bar Association invited me to write[5] about what young corporate lawyers needed to understand about how business works. Based on that research, I want to point to an important set of distinctions between public and private corporations, and what it all means for the Trump Organization.

Public corporations are those businesses that trade their stock on a public market, such as the New York Stock Exchange. They are regulated by the Security and Exchange Commission and affected by a number of important federal laws, most notably the Corporate Fraud Accountability Act[6], popularly known as Sarbanes-Oxley.

Private companies like the Trump Organization do not trade their stock publicly. Ownership is tightly held by a limited number of chosen investors. As such, they escape the scrutiny of these public overseers.

Outside oversight

The CEO of a public company is subject to an array of constraints and a varying but always substantial degree of oversight.

There are boards of directors, of course, that review all major strategic decisions. And there are separate committees that assess CEO performance and determine compensation, composed entirely of independent directors who don’t have any ongoing involvement in running the business.

In addition, public shareholders are entitled to vote directly on the compensation awarded to top executives. Whole categories of CEO decisions, including mergers and acquisitions, international expansions and changes in the corporation’s charter are subject to the opinion of shareholders and directors.

The composition of the board of directors is also regulated by law. Half of the directors must be independent of the company[7]. And the board committees charged with conducting audits, hiring and firing the CEO and determining executive pay must be 100% independent. Company insiders and close family members may sit on public boards but are not counted as independent.

Full disclosure

The SEC requires[8] the CEOs of public corporations to make full and public disclosures of their financial performance. Regular reports require disclosure of operating expenses, significant partnerships, liabilities, strategies, risks and plans.

Additionally, public companies must hire an independent auditing firm approved by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board[9] to conduct and verify the thoroughness and accuracy of those financial statements. Any fraudulent reporting can result in criminal charges against the CEO and chief financial officer.

These rules are all intended to safeguard the integrity of corporations, to help make them transparent to public investors and to guard against corruption. They are far from perfect[10], but they are helpful. And private corporations are not required to comply with any of them.

Donald Trump wearing a dark overcoat and standing in front a bunch of American flags holds up his fist. The Trump Organization was accountable to no one but Trump. AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin[11]

How ‘Trump Inc.’ operated

Well-governed companies, such as Microsoft and PepsiCo[12], tend to outperform[13] poorly governed ones, often dramatically. That’s largely due to all the factors noted above, including accountability.

Management at the Trump Organization, on the other hand, was accountable to no one, other than Trump himself. The executive team of the Trump Organization – a limited liability company that has owned and run hundreds of businesses involving real estate, hotels, golf courses and much else – is made up[14] entirely of his children and people who are loyal to him. And his decision-making authority was unconstrained by any external oversight or internal constraints.

Decisions concerning what businesses to start or exit, how much money to borrow and at what interest rates, how to market products and services, and how to pay suppliers or treat customers were made centrally and not subject to review.

Trump, it should be noted, made one stab at a public company in the mid-1990s: Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts[15]. That was an unmitigated disaster[16], leading to five separate declarations of bankruptcy starting in 2004, all during a period when other casino companies thrived.

As a private company, the Trump Organization was under no obligation to follow the guidelines of good governance. Because, in my view, it voluntarily decided to ignore such guidelines, the indictment may be only the first of many[17].

Article updated with details of the indictment.

This story is an updated version of an article published[18] on Feb. 16, 2017.

References

  1. ^ indicted the Trump Organization (www.nytimes.com)
  2. ^ Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg (www.nytimes.com)
  3. ^ scholar in corporate leadership and governance (damore-mckim.northeastern.edu)
  4. ^ will lead to disastrous results (www.nytimes.com)
  5. ^ invited me to write (www.americanbar.org)
  6. ^ Corporate Fraud Accountability Act (www.complianceonline.com)
  7. ^ independent of the company (corporatefinanceinstitute.com)
  8. ^ SEC requires (www.legalandcompliance.com)
  9. ^ Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (pcaobus.org)
  10. ^ far from perfect (www.londontfe.com)
  11. ^ AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin (newsroom.ap.org)
  12. ^ Microsoft and PepsiCo (ethicalboardroom.com)
  13. ^ tend to outperform (www.nber.org)
  14. ^ is made up (www.nytimes.com)
  15. ^ Trump Hotels and Casino Resorts (theconversation.com)
  16. ^ unmitigated disaster (www.washingtonpost.com)
  17. ^ may be only the first of many (www.brookings.edu)
  18. ^ article published (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/trump-organization-indictment-hints-at-downsides-of-having-no-independent-oversight-unlike-companies-traded-on-wall-street-163698

Active Wear

Times Magazine

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

The Times Features

How early is too early’ for Hot Cross Buns to hit supermarket and bakery shelves

Every year, Australians find themselves in the middle of the nation’s most delicious dilemmas - ...

Ovarian cancer community rallied Parliament

The fight against ovarian cancer took centre stage at Parliament House in Canberra last week as th...

After 2 years of devastating war, will Arab countries now turn their backs on Israel?

The Middle East has long been riddled by instability. This makes getting a sense of the broader...

RBA keeps interest rates on hold, leaving borrowers looking further ahead for relief

As expected, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has kept the cash rate steady at 3.6%[1]. Its b...

Crystalbrook Collection Introduces ‘No Rings Attached’: Australia’s First Un-Honeymoon for Couples

Why should newlyweds have all the fun? As Australia’s crude marriage rate falls to a 20-year low, ...

Echoes of the Past: Sue Carter Brings Ancient Worlds to Life at Birli Gallery

Launching November 15 at 6pm at Birli Gallery, Midland, Echoes of the Past marks the highly anti...

Why careless adoption of AI backfires so easily

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming commonplace, despite statistics showing[1] th...

How airline fares are set and should we expect lower fares any time soon?

Airline ticket prices may seem mysterious (why is the same flight one price one day, quite anoth...

What is the American public’s verdict on the first year of Donald Trump’s second term as President?

In short: the verdict is decidedly mixed, leaning negative. Trump’s overall job-approval ra...