The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Resettling refugees in other countries is not reliable, nor is it fair. So, why is Australia doing it?

  • Written by Claire Higgins, Senior Research Fellow, Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW

The federal government has scrambled in recent days to minimise the political fallout from its treatment of the Tamil family from Biloela. After almost two years stuck on Christmas Island, the Murugappans are now being permitted to return to the mainland under community detention while their asylum case is settled.

Last week, Foreign Affairs Minister Marise Payne raised the prospect of resettling the family in New Zealand or the US, before Home Affairs Minister Karen Andrews dismissed the idea[1], saying they are not eligible because they have not been found to be refugees.

All this talk has caused much confusion[2], and sparked questions around what Canberra is doing to resolve the plight of other displaced people to whom it has refused entry — namely, the hundreds[3] of refugees who have been held for years in Australia’s system of offshore processing.

Andrews has said the Australian government is exploring resettlement overseas for “broad cohorts[4]” of people. The minister’s focus[5] is apparently on refugees who were held offshore in Papua New Guinea and Nauru, and are currently in Australia for medical treatment.

The chance of a resettlement deal with New Zealand for these refugees is reported[6] to be gaining traction — although there are no tangible results yet.

Meanwhile, a deal struck with Washington[7] in 2016 to offer resettlement to the US for up to 1,250 refugees held in PNG and Nauru is still playing out years later.

As of last month, there are approximately 200 refugees who have been approved for entry to the United States and are waiting to depart, and a further 260 pre-approved[8] in advance of final health checks.

Who is eligible for resettlement in another country?

For a start, it helps to understand why Canberra wants other countries to resettle refugees who sought protection in Australia.

On July 19 2013, the Rudd Labor government introduced a hardline ban on entry: people who sought asylum by boat on or after that date, and were transferred to PNG or Nauru, would never settle in Australia. This has been maintained under successive Liberal governments, and a total of 3,127[9] people were sent offshore.

The ban has been criticised for its “absolutist ambition[10]” — the idea that the admission of any one person would cause the entire system of border control to collapse.

This is despite the fact Australia has obligations[11] under international refugee and human rights law to protect people fleeing persecution or other serious human rights violations.

A central plank of this absolutism is that asylum seekers who arrive by boat, and are found to be refugees, will only ever be able to secure a durable and humane solution in another country – if such an opportunity can be found.

Resettling refugees in other countries is not reliable, nor is it fair. So, why is Australia doing it? Refugees protesting against Australia’s policies outside the UNHCR representative office in Indonesia in 2019. Tatan Syuflana/AP

For those not subject to the hardline ban on entry — some 30,000 people[12] who sought asylum by boat after mid-2012 and before January 1 2014, and were not transferred offshore — a complex legal regime narrows their path to protection in Australia.

These people are subject to limited-term visas[13] and a lot of uncertainty. The Biloela family have had to deal with this “byzantine[14]” system, having arrived before the ban came into effect.

Deals with third countries

After the ban, successive Australian governments have tried to make deals with third countries to resettle those who were sent to PNG or Nauru.

A 2014 agreement with Cambodia was said to cost A$55 million[15], and was ultimately taken up by just a handful of refugees. In 2015, the Philippines was reportedly[16] wooed by Australian officials for a potential deal to resettle refugees worth $150 million that never eventuated.

Read more: Resettling refugees in Australia would not resume the people-smuggling trade[17]

The 2016 deal with Washington promised hope for those held offshore. Negotiated with the Obama administration, the deal was soon subject to the whims of President Donald Trump, with resettlement stalling several times.

In a testy phone call[18] with then-Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull that was leaked to the media, Trump lambasted what he called a “stupid deal” that could allow Australia to export new “Boston bombers” to the US. Turnbull, in turn, provided reassurance that Australia would resettle Central American refugees from the US, telling Trump, “we will take anyone that you want us to take”.

Resettling refugees in other countries is not reliable, nor is it fair. So, why is Australia doing it? Screenshot of Trump tweet on Australia refugee resettlement deal. PR Handout Image/AAP Image/Tweeter

While Trump and Turnbull bickered, the young writer Imran Mohammad, held in detention on Manus Island, said he feared[19] “the Australian government has no proper plans for our future”.

Amid long delays in resettlement to the US, non-profit organisations have recently taken up the cause, with one group securing up to 140 places[20] in Canada last month for refugees still held in limbo under the offshore policy.

Contrary to “common decency”

Resettlement deals aren’t new. On several occasions since the 1960s, Australia has offered to resettle refugees whose journeys to the US were politically contentious. This includes generations of Cubans who have tried to flee their island nation since the early 1970s. As recently as 2017, Australia resettled 17 Cubans[21] found clinging to a lighthouse off the coast of Florida.

Washington has responded in turn. The most recent and well-known example is the 2016 resettlement agreement, but the practice has a longer history, involving refugees held under the Howard government’s version of offshore processing in the early 2000s[22].

These transfers have been upheld by both governments as a sign of bilateral goodwill and cooperation. But the UN refugee agency UNHCR has been less impressed, noting that Canberra’s insistence on denying entry to Australia for even those refugees who have close family in the country is contrary[23] “to common decency”.

Read more: Why do Tamil asylum seekers need protection — and why does the Australian government say they don't?[24]

No easy answer

This coming year, Australia will spend around $2 billion[25] to maintain its onshore and offshore detention centres. Many of the people within that system have been held in limbo for years.

The government rhetoric has not softened on the issue, either, not even with Tharnicaa Murugappan marking her fourth birthday[26] in a Perth hospital after contracting a blood infection caused by untreated pneumonia.

To release these two young children and their parents back to Biloela, the argument goes, would reignite the people smuggling trade – what Attorney-General Michaela Cash has called the “consequences[27] of blinking”.

But this approach has a significant human and economic cost[28], and damages Australia’s reputation abroad. The offshore system[29], and the treatment of the young family from Biloela, have earned Canberra plenty of criticism[30] in the international press.

With long delays and no guarantees, it is clear that resettlement deals cannot get Australia “off the hook[31]”, either.

References

  1. ^ dismissed the idea (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ confusion (minister.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  3. ^ hundreds (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  4. ^ broad cohorts (twitter.com)
  5. ^ focus (minister.homeaffairs.gov.au)
  6. ^ reported (www.theguardian.com)
  7. ^ deal struck with Washington (www.theguardian.com)
  8. ^ pre-approved (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  9. ^ 3,127 (www.refugeecouncil.org.au)
  10. ^ absolutist ambition (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ obligations (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)
  12. ^ 30,000 people (temporary.kaldorcentre.net)
  13. ^ limited-term visas (temporary.kaldorcentre.net)
  14. ^ byzantine (www.themonthly.com.au)
  15. ^ cost A$55 million (www.theguardian.com)
  16. ^ reportedly (www.sbs.com.au)
  17. ^ Resettling refugees in Australia would not resume the people-smuggling trade (theconversation.com)
  18. ^ testy phone call (www.smh.com.au)
  19. ^ said he feared (www.smh.com.au)
  20. ^ 140 places (www.theguardian.com)
  21. ^ resettled 17 Cubans (www.theguardian.com)
  22. ^ early 2000s (papers.ssrn.com)
  23. ^ contrary (www.unhcr.org)
  24. ^ Why do Tamil asylum seekers need protection — and why does the Australian government say they don't? (theconversation.com)
  25. ^ $2 billion (theconversation.com)
  26. ^ marking her fourth birthday (www.sbs.com.au)
  27. ^ consequences (www.smh.com.au)
  28. ^ human and economic cost (www.kaldorcentre.unsw.edu.au)
  29. ^ offshore system (www.nytimes.com)
  30. ^ criticism (www.bbc.com)
  31. ^ off the hook (www.abc.net.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/resettling-refugees-in-other-countries-is-not-reliable-nor-is-it-fair-so-why-is-australia-doing-it-162505

The Times Features

Best Deals on Home Furniture Online

Key Highlights Discover the best deals on high-quality outdoor furniture online. Transform your outdoor space into a stylish and comfortable oasis. Explore a wide range of d...

Discover the Best Women's Jumpers for Every Season

Key Highlights Explore lightweight jumpers for spring and summer, ensuring breathability and ease. Wrap up warm with cozy wool jumpers for the chilly autumn and winter season...

Uncover the Elegance of Gorgeous Diamond Tennis Necklaces

Key Highlights Diamond tennis necklaces are a timeless piece of jewelry that exudes elegance and sophistication. They feature a continuous line of brilliant-cut diamonds, cre...

Dental Implants vs. Dentures: Which Is Better for You?

When it comes to replacing missing teeth, two of the most common options are dental implants and dentures. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, so choosing between them ...

What Neck Pain Really Means (And Why It’s More Than Just Poor Posture)

Neck pain is often brushed off as something temporary — a tight spot after a long day at the desk or a poor night’s sleep. But when the discomfort keeps returning, it could be a ...

The Work of Gosha Rubchinskiy: Fashion, Culture, and Youth

From Designer to Cultural Architect Gosha Rubchinskiy is not just a fashion designer—he's a cultural force. Born in Moscow in 1984, Rubchinskiy began his career in fashion in t...

Times Magazine

The Essential Guide to Transforming Office Spaces for Maximum Efficiency

Why Office Fitouts MatterA well-designed office can make all the difference in productivity, employee satisfaction, and client impressions. Businesses of all sizes are investing in updated office spaces to create environments that foster collaborat...

The A/B Testing Revolution: How AI Optimized Landing Pages Without Human Input

A/B testing was always integral to the web-based marketing world. Was there a button that converted better? Marketing could pit one against the other and see which option worked better. This was always through human observation, and over time, as d...

Using Countdown Timers in Email: Do They Really Increase Conversions?

In a world that's always on, where marketers are attempting to entice a subscriber and get them to convert on the same screen with one email, the power of urgency is sometimes the essential element needed. One of the most popular ways to create urg...

Types of Software Consultants

In today's technology-driven world, businesses often seek the expertise of software consultants to navigate complex software needs. There are several types of software consultants, including solution architects, project managers, and user experienc...

CWU Assistive Tech Hub is Changing Lives: Win a Free Rollator Walker This Easter!

🌟 Mobility. Independence. Community. All in One. This Easter, the CWU Assistive Tech Hub is pleased to support the Banyule community by giving away a rollator walker. The giveaway will take place during the Macleod Village Easter Egg Hunt & Ma...

"Eternal Nurture" by Cara Barilla: A Timeless Collection of Wisdom and Healing

Renowned Sydney-born author and educator Cara Barilla has released her latest book, Eternal Nurture, a profound collection of inspirational quotes designed to support mindfulness, emotional healing, and personal growth. With a deep commitment to ...

LayBy Shopping