Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

Women are as likely as men to accept a gender pay gap if they benefit from it

  • Written by: Marlon Williams, Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Dayton
Women are as likely as men to accept a gender pay gap if they benefit from it

The Research Brief[1] is a short take about interesting academic work.

The big idea

Women are just as inclined as men to vote against a policy to reduce a gender pay gap if they are personally benefiting from the status quo. This is one of the main findings of my new study[2], which was published in January 2021 in the journal Applied Economics Letters.

I conducted a series of laboratory experiments in which I recruited participants to do a 30-question quiz. The participants knew from the start that they would be paid based on the number of questions they answered correctly. In roughly half of the sessions, the quiz was written in a way to give men an advantage. I achieved this by choosing questions that were mainly on topics that surveys show men tend to be more interested in than women, such as sports[3] and certain movie genres[4]. The quiz for the other half of the sessions were designed in a similar way to give women an advantage.

In the version with a male bias, men answered an average of 21 questions correctly, while women answered only 13 right. This was meant to mimic the current real-world situation in which men, on average, earn more than women. The questions were carefully chosen so that the quiz that favored women had mirrored results: the average woman answered 21 correctly, the average man just 13.

Three times at different stages of the experiment participants voted to either be paid $1 for every correct answer or to give the group that was at a disadvantage a leg up. If the second payment option won the majority vote, the disadvantaged participants would get $1.25 per right answer, while those who benefited from the biased test would receive just 85 cents.

In all three votes, which had similar results, I found that women were actually more likely than men to vote against the policy that would have led to a narrowing of the pay gap when they earned more money in the quiz. On average, 96.8% of women’s votes were against the proposed corrective payment policy when they were more likely to correctly answer the questions, compared with 90.5% of the men’s votes when they had the edge.

In addition, when women were at a disadvantage, they were more likely to vote in favor of the corrective policy, with 79.5% supporting it versus 73% for the men.

While social science laboratory experiments like mine cannot fully capture every nuance, I believe my qualitative results are similar to what we would find in the real world.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter[5].]

Why it matters

Debate over the gender pay gap can become quite heated[6].

The latest data from Pew Research Center show women make 84 cents on the dollar[7] of what men earn—a gap that hasn’t changed much in recent years.

And surveys have found that men are more likely to oppose measures[8] to correct this gap and even question whether the gap exists in the first place. A 2019 SurveyMonkey poll showed that 46% of men believe[9] the gender pay gap “is made up to serve a political purpose” rather than a “legitimate issue.”

My research suggests women might feel the same if the positions were reversed. Additionally, it suggests that men would also likely be equally vociferous in calling for a narrowing of the gap if they found themselves in a world where they were holding the short end of the stick.

Ideally, I hope this research will lead people to reexamine the positions they hold on issues like this one and consider how self-interest may be driving their arguments. Maybe it can lead to more understanding and increase the focus in these debates on the available evidence.

What’s next

In my current and future work, I seek to experimentally determine people’s willingness to sacrifice personal financial gains in favor of an outcome that they see as serving the common good. This involves, for example, testing how much income the average employee or executive is willing to sacrifice to reduce income inequality.

References

  1. ^ Research Brief (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ one of the main findings of my new study (doi.org)
  3. ^ sports (www.statista.com)
  4. ^ certain movie genres (www.statista.com)
  5. ^ Sign up for our weekly newsletter (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ can become quite heated (www.bps.org.uk)
  7. ^ women make 84 cents on the dollar (www.pewresearch.org)
  8. ^ men are more likely to oppose measures (media.glassdoor.com)
  9. ^ 46% of men believe (time.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/women-are-as-likely-as-men-to-accept-a-gender-pay-gap-if-they-benefit-from-it-151524

Times Magazine

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerful As Content

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

Surprising things Aussies do to ‘manifest’ winning a dream home as Australia’s biggest ever prize unveiled

Dream Home Art Union has unveiled its biggest prize in its 70-year history supporting veterans - a...

A Beginner’s Guide To Louis Vuitton: The Style, The Products And The Global Obsession

Luxury fashion can sometimes appear intimidating to newcomers. The terminology, the prices, the bo...

Cartier: Discover the Collection That Became a Global Symbol of Luxury

Few luxury brands carry the same instant recognition as Cartier. The name itself evokes images of...

Cheap Wine in Australia: The Golden Age of Affordable Drinking

Australia has long enjoyed a reputation as one of the world’s great wine-producing nations, but fo...

Federal Budget and Motoring: Luxury Car Tax, Fuel Excise and the Cost of Driving in Australia

For millions of Australians, the Federal Budget is not an abstract economic document discussed onl...

The Times Features

Lasagne Takes Centre Stage at Chiswick Woollahra This W…

  This winter, Chiswick is launching a Lasagne Series, bringing together chefs from across the Solo...

WEST HQ WHAT’S ON

From major sporting moments and immersive family experiences to standout dining and world-class live...

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerfu…

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

Coral Trout Worth Travelling For: Lunch at The Rusty Pe…

There are fish and chips, and then there are meals that remind Australians why fresh local seafood...

Alison Penfold will fight to protect women in Sex Discr…

Member for Lyne Alison Penfold is standing up for women and their rights, set to introduce practic...

Surprising things Aussies do to ‘manifest’ winning a dr…

Dream Home Art Union has unveiled its biggest prize in its 70-year history supporting veterans - a...

Louis Vuitton Cruise 2027: Fashion’s Floating Spectacle…

The annual cruise collection from Louis Vuitton has once again proven why it remains one of the mo...

“We Just Want Certainty”: Small Businesses React To The…

Australia’s small business sector has delivered a mixed — and at times anxious — response to the F...

“I Thought It Would Cost $500”: The Great Australian DI…

Every weekend across Australia, ordinary people walk confidently into hardware stores believing th...