The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

Women are as likely as men to accept a gender pay gap if they benefit from it

  • Written by Marlon Williams, Assistant Professor of Economics, University of Dayton
Women are as likely as men to accept a gender pay gap if they benefit from it

The Research Brief[1] is a short take about interesting academic work.

The big idea

Women are just as inclined as men to vote against a policy to reduce a gender pay gap if they are personally benefiting from the status quo. This is one of the main findings of my new study[2], which was published in January 2021 in the journal Applied Economics Letters.

I conducted a series of laboratory experiments in which I recruited participants to do a 30-question quiz. The participants knew from the start that they would be paid based on the number of questions they answered correctly. In roughly half of the sessions, the quiz was written in a way to give men an advantage. I achieved this by choosing questions that were mainly on topics that surveys show men tend to be more interested in than women, such as sports[3] and certain movie genres[4]. The quiz for the other half of the sessions were designed in a similar way to give women an advantage.

In the version with a male bias, men answered an average of 21 questions correctly, while women answered only 13 right. This was meant to mimic the current real-world situation in which men, on average, earn more than women. The questions were carefully chosen so that the quiz that favored women had mirrored results: the average woman answered 21 correctly, the average man just 13.

Three times at different stages of the experiment participants voted to either be paid $1 for every correct answer or to give the group that was at a disadvantage a leg up. If the second payment option won the majority vote, the disadvantaged participants would get $1.25 per right answer, while those who benefited from the biased test would receive just 85 cents.

In all three votes, which had similar results, I found that women were actually more likely than men to vote against the policy that would have led to a narrowing of the pay gap when they earned more money in the quiz. On average, 96.8% of women’s votes were against the proposed corrective payment policy when they were more likely to correctly answer the questions, compared with 90.5% of the men’s votes when they had the edge.

In addition, when women were at a disadvantage, they were more likely to vote in favor of the corrective policy, with 79.5% supporting it versus 73% for the men.

While social science laboratory experiments like mine cannot fully capture every nuance, I believe my qualitative results are similar to what we would find in the real world.

[Get the best of The Conversation, every weekend. Sign up for our weekly newsletter[5].]

Why it matters

Debate over the gender pay gap can become quite heated[6].

The latest data from Pew Research Center show women make 84 cents on the dollar[7] of what men earn—a gap that hasn’t changed much in recent years.

And surveys have found that men are more likely to oppose measures[8] to correct this gap and even question whether the gap exists in the first place. A 2019 SurveyMonkey poll showed that 46% of men believe[9] the gender pay gap “is made up to serve a political purpose” rather than a “legitimate issue.”

My research suggests women might feel the same if the positions were reversed. Additionally, it suggests that men would also likely be equally vociferous in calling for a narrowing of the gap if they found themselves in a world where they were holding the short end of the stick.

Ideally, I hope this research will lead people to reexamine the positions they hold on issues like this one and consider how self-interest may be driving their arguments. Maybe it can lead to more understanding and increase the focus in these debates on the available evidence.

What’s next

In my current and future work, I seek to experimentally determine people’s willingness to sacrifice personal financial gains in favor of an outcome that they see as serving the common good. This involves, for example, testing how much income the average employee or executive is willing to sacrifice to reduce income inequality.

References

  1. ^ Research Brief (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ one of the main findings of my new study (doi.org)
  3. ^ sports (www.statista.com)
  4. ^ certain movie genres (www.statista.com)
  5. ^ Sign up for our weekly newsletter (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ can become quite heated (www.bps.org.uk)
  7. ^ women make 84 cents on the dollar (www.pewresearch.org)
  8. ^ men are more likely to oppose measures (media.glassdoor.com)
  9. ^ 46% of men believe (time.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/women-are-as-likely-as-men-to-accept-a-gender-pay-gap-if-they-benefit-from-it-151524

Times Magazine

The Voltx Topband V1200 Portable Power Station Review

When we received a Voltx Topband V1200 portable power station for review, a staff member at The Time...

Is E10 fuel bad for my car? And could it save me money?

Fuel has become a precious, and increasingly expensive, commodity. The ongoing Middle East co...

Efficient Water Carts for Dust Control

Managing dust effectively is a critical challenge across numerous industries in Australia. From sp...

How new rules could stop AI scrapers destroying the internet

Australians are among the most anxious in the world[1] about artificial intelligence (AI). This...

Why Car Enthusiasts Are Turning to Container Shipping for Interstate Moves

Moving across the country requires careful planning and plenty of patience. The scale of domestic ...

What to know if you’re considering an EV

Soaring petrol prices are once again making many Australians think seriously[1] about switching ...

The Times Features

Samsung expands B2B Mobile eXperience distribution with Ingram Micro Australia

The channel diversification reinforcers the Australian B2B division’s positive trajectory SYDNE...

Focusing on how and why you eat – not just what – may be the key to healthy eating

When most people think about “healthy eating”, they usually focus on what they eat. That might...

HARRY POTTER™: THE EXHIBITION TICKETS NOW ON SALE!

An Enchanting Exhibition Celebrating the world of Harry Potter Opens in SYDNEY on 14 MAY Get r...

Leader of The Nationals Matt Canavan - Sky News Interview

SKY NEWS TRANSCRIPT WITH HOST PETER STEFANOVIC; FUEL CRISIS; PAGE RESEARCH CENTRE REPORT ON LIQUID F...

Taste Port Douglas 10-year celebration

Serving up more than 40 events across four days, the anniversary edition  promises a vibrant cel...

Is dark chocolate healthier than milk chocolate? 2 dietitians explain

Easter chocolate is all over supermarket shelves. Some people reach straight for milk chocolat...

Compulsory super is higher than ever at 12%. But cutting it would hurt low-paid workers most

A central element of Australia’s superannuation system is the superannuation guarantee[1] (SG). ...

Grants open for port communities across the Hunter and Northern Rivers regions

Local organisations doing important work across the Hunter and Northern Rivers regions are being...

AI Is Already Here. The Question Is Whether Your Business Is Built for It

We sat down with Nirlep Adhikari — CTO at LoanOptions.ai and Founder of Mount Mindforce — to cut...