The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

FIFA has a human rights policy, so how could it award Saudi Arabia the 2034 soccer World Cup?

  • Written by Keith Rathbone, Senior Lecturer, Modern European History and Sports History, Macquarie University




Last week, FIFA officially awarded Saudi Arabia the 2034 World Cup[1].

The Gulf Kingdom was the sole bidder after the Asian Football Confederation made it clear it would not support an Australian bid[2].

Supporters of the decision, including respected sports journalist Tracey Holmes[3], argue a World Cup in the kingdom offers a once-in-a-generation opportunity to foster positive change. A range of celebrities and players[4] also congratulated the Saudi Arabian Football Association and Prime Minister Mohammed bin Salman.

Saudi Arabia will host the 2034 men’s World Cup, despite the country’s human rights record.

Human rights groups, though, have widely condemned FIFA’s decision – Human Rights Watch warned[5]:

[There is] a near certainty the 2034 World Cup […] will be stained with pervasive rights violations.

FIFA and human rights

FIFA claims it can encourage positive human rights transformations in host nations, and since 2017 it has enshrined human rights in its guiding principles.

In 2017, FIFA’s executive committee signed onto the so-called “Ruggie Principles”[6], adopted by the United Nations Human Rights Council unanimously in 2011.

These principles recognise that:

  • states have the duty to protect human rights
  • businesses have the responsibility to align their activities with human rights
  • individuals and organisations need to have effective judicial and non-judicial remedies to human rights violations.

FIFA subsequently published its own Human Rights Policy[7]. It makes a commitment for FIFA to “exercise its leverage, and seek to increase said leverage where necessary, in connection with adverse human rights impacts arising through its business relationships” and to “strive to go beyond its responsibility to respect human rights […] by taking measures to promote the protection of human rights.”

Read more: Is FIFA's sponsorship deal with a Saudi-owned oil giant really 'a middle finger' to women’s soccer?[8]

Querying recent World Cup hosts

Of course, FIFA’s own guidelines raise the question: does evidence support the claim that hosting a World Cup promotes human rights improvements?

There is very little reason to suspect the FIFA 2034 World Cup will lead to lasting change in Saudi Arabia. Mega events rarely result in lasting human rights improvements, especially when measured against their human costs.

The reason why sports mega-events do not change societies is because FIFA’s influence is very weak compared to the power of authoritarian rulers like Mohammed bin Salman (Saudi Arabia), Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani (Qatar), and Vladimir Putin (Russia).

These leaders are adept at taking on mega-events – in sports or otherwise – and using these events’ popularity[9] to drive their own political agendas.

The Russian 2018 World Cup bid shows how little power FIFA has to change a government’s political agenda.

Russia allegedly won the cup after a fraudulent competitive process[10].

Then, legislators in Western Europe and the United States pressed FIFA to move the competition[11] because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its alleged attacks on defectors in the United Kingdom. During the cup, LGBTQIA+ activists and journalists in Russia faced persecution[12] from state security.

Ahead of the 2022 Qatar World Cup, Qatar promised to reform its human rights record. The government made changes to improve labour relations, but hundreds if not thousands died[13] during the construction phase.

The Qataris made very few steps to improve rights for women, religious minorities, or LGBTQIA+ people. During the event, FIFA banned rainbow captains’ armbands[14], previously allowed, at the request of the Qatari government, which provoked protest from players.

Human rights and the Saudi bid

In July this year, FIFA published reports on the 2034 bid and its human rights strategy in connection with the World Cup.

FIFA’s executive summary of the 2034 bid[15] assesses the risks of a human rights issue in 2034 as medium. However, it also says there is “good potential that hosting the competition could help contribute to positive human rights impacts”.

This comes despite the possibility of labour rights violations, identity-based discrimination, violations of the rights for the disabled, and the lack of freedom of expression.

The Saudi Arabian Football Association’s 28-page document makes no promises about press freedom[16]. Nor does it mention LGBTQIA+ rights – Saudi law criminalises homosexuality and trans identity[17].

The report can offer no concrete assurances Saudi Arabia will protect religious freedom and minority rights.

What about labour rights?

The largest part of the Saudi Arabian Football Association’s report deals with labour relations. It promises to rectify the kingdom’s derisory labour rights after identifying widespread labour problems, including issues with welfare standards and forced labour.

However, the report also notes the kingdom has made several overhauls[18] of labour law in the past two decades to improve working conditions.

Nevertheless, there are many reasons to doubt these promises.

The 2034 World Cup requires an astounding[19] 11 new stadiums, transport networks, and the construction of almost 200,000 new hotel rooms.

The kingdom’s construction boom is already fuelled by approximately 13 million migrant labourers working under dire conditions. A Guardian investigation[20] discovered high numbers of excess deaths among migrant labourers in Saudi Arabia, particularly those from Bangladesh. In 2022 alone, 1,500 Bangladeshi migrant workers died.

Why give the World Cup to authoritarian regimes?

So why does FIFA maintain that awarding hosting rights to problematic countries is a chance to drive positive change when the evidence suggests the opposite?

FIFA can only award the hosting rights to countries that bid for the World Cup. The increasingly high costs of hosting mean few countries are willing to sign onto the hosting responsibilities.

Australia was willing to host[21] in 2034, but crucially it did not have the support of the Asian Football Confederation.

Saudi Arabia simply was willing to spend what it took to ensure their bid won. This is possibly another example of their broader effort to “sportswash”[22] their regime’s human rights records.

Read more: What can sport fans do if their team, or league, is being sportswashed?[23]

For FIFA, it makes sense to award bidding rights to countries that can generate revenue through co-partnerships, sponsorships, and most importantly favourable TV contracts. In this regard, Saudi Arabia’s bid makes the most sense.

References

  1. ^ Saudi Arabia the 2034 World Cup (www.fifa.com)
  2. ^ an Australian bid (www.smh.com.au)
  3. ^ respected sports journalist Tracey Holmes (www.youtube.com)
  4. ^ range of celebrities and players (www.goal.com)
  5. ^ Human Rights Watch warned (www.abc.net.au)
  6. ^ so-called “Ruggie Principles” (www.ohchr.org)
  7. ^ Human Rights Policy (digitalhub.fifa.com)
  8. ^ Is FIFA's sponsorship deal with a Saudi-owned oil giant really 'a middle finger' to women’s soccer? (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ using these events’ popularity (www.tandfonline.com)
  10. ^ a fraudulent competitive process (www.nytimes.com)
  11. ^ pressed FIFA to move the competition (www.politico.eu)
  12. ^ LGBTQIA+ activists and journalists in Russia faced persecution (edition.cnn.com)
  13. ^ hundreds if not thousands died (www.lemonde.fr)
  14. ^ FIFA banned rainbow captains’ armbands (www.forbes.com)
  15. ^ FIFA’s executive summary of the 2034 bid (digitalhub.fifa.com)
  16. ^ makes no promises about press freedom (digitalhub.fifa.com)
  17. ^ criminalises homosexuality and trans identity (www.humandignitytrust.org)
  18. ^ the kingdom has made several overhauls (digitalhub.fifa.com)
  19. ^ requires an astounding (saudi2034.com.sa)
  20. ^ Guardian investigation (www.theguardian.com)
  21. ^ Australia was willing to host (www.smh.com.au)
  22. ^ of their broader effort to “sportswash” (www.bbc.com)
  23. ^ What can sport fans do if their team, or league, is being sportswashed? (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/fifa-has-a-human-rights-policy-so-how-could-it-award-saudi-arabia-the-2034-soccer-world-cup-245852

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Tricia Paoluccio designer to the stars

The Case for Nuturing Creativity in the Classroom, and in our Lives I am an actress and an artist who has had the privilege of sharing my work across many countries, touring my ...

Duke of Dural to Get Rooftop Bar as New Owners Invest in Venue Upgrade

The Duke of Dural, in Sydney’s north-west, is set for a major uplift under new ownership, following its acquisition by hospitality group Good Beer Company this week. Led by resp...

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...