Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media

How might the Melbourne factory fire affect health and the environment? An air pollution expert explains

  • Written by: Gabriel da Silva, Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering, The University of Melbourne

A very large factory fire in Melbourne sent plumes of thick, dark smoke billowing across the western part of the city on Wednesday afternoon, with authorities issuing[1] warnings[2] for people in surrounding suburbs. The fire has now been brought under control[3], but efforts to control the impacts will likely continue for days.

It has been reported[4] the fire, which Fire Rescue Victoria said[5] involved a large chemical explosion, was at a site run by the chemical blending corporation ACB Group.

That’s yet to be officially confirmed at the time of writing, but is consistent with the type of fire seen in media footage. ACB Group mixes together a range of different hazardous chemicals for various industries.

We don’t know at this stage exactly what was on site during the fire. But when I looked at a cached version of the ACB Group’s website on Wednesday afternoon, I could see they handle common flammable compounds such as fuels, corrosive substances, chemicals supplied to the automotive industry and various solvents and thinners. These chemicals are typically highly flammable.

The issue is that when you have so many liquids like these stored together, once a fire starts and you get an explosion, it will continue to grow and burn very intensely.

People reported[6] seeing barrels exploding and launching themselves into the air, which makes it particularly hard to battle the fire.

In a fire with so much fuel, not enough air is available to completely burn those chemicals. This results in the plumes of thick, black, billowing smoke seen here.

Why is smoke from a fire like this a problem?

The first thing to remember is that all smoke is harmful. Typically, if you can smell smoke, it’s at a level where it could be impacting your health.

It’s not so much a function of what produced the smoke from Wednesday’s fire; it’s just there was so much of it and it was so concentrated.

Smoke contains ultrafine particles known as PM2.5 (PM stands for “particulate matter”). There might be other vapours in there specific to the fuel source – but even in the absence of those, smoke has particulate matter in it and that is harmful to health, no matter the chemical composition.

I looked at PM2.5[7] levels across Melbourne and at the start of Wednesday they were very low. But PM2.5 levels did spike in the west of Melbourne in the afternoon, reaching levels of concern.

Fortunately they have since come back down, but may increase again on Wednesday night as mixing slows down in the still night air.

If you are especially sensitive to particulate matter – for example, if you have asthma or a respiratory condition – and you ever find yourself close to smoke like this, you could do the following things:

  • stay indoors or away from affected suburbs

  • close ventilation openings

  • close windows and doors

  • try to isolate yourself in clean air and wait until the air quality has improved outside

  • wear an N95 or P2 mask if must go outside.

It’s similar to what you would do in cases where bushfire smoke is affecting air quality.

Across broader Melbourne, though, the air quality threat quickly dissipated.

Longer-term effects

The more lingering environmental effect is the threat to waterways. The risk is the water used to put out the fire carrying chemicals, ash and debris from the fire to local waterways, which can cause problems for plants and animals. Authorities would be actively trying to manage that risk.

For humans, incidents such as these can contribute to the burden of air pollution that people in cities deal with over the long term.

This long-term exposure to poor quality air is now known to contribute to many conditions affecting almost every part of our bodies.

References

  1. ^ issuing (www.epa.vic.gov.au)
  2. ^ warnings (www.frv.vic.gov.au)
  3. ^ under control (www.frv.vic.gov.au)
  4. ^ reported (www.abc.net.au)
  5. ^ said (www.frv.vic.gov.au)
  6. ^ reported (www.abc.net.au)
  7. ^ PM2.5 (map.purpleair.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-might-the-melbourne-factory-fire-affect-health-and-the-environment-an-air-pollution-expert-explains-234379

Times Magazine

Will Travis Kelce follow the athlete silicone ring trend?

From the NFL to the All Blacks, professional athletes have been ditching metal for silicone rings. W...

The AI economy: How artificial intelligence is creating the jobs of tomorrow in Australia

Artificial intelligence has become one of the most discussed technologies of the decade, often acc...

Yoga and Tai Chi: Why Simple Movement Still Inspires Millions

In a world of high-intensity workouts, fitness technology and ever-changing exercise trends, two a...

Technology

Why Australian Enterprises Are Reth…

The corporate landscape in Australia has undergone a permanent structural shift over the past few ...

Local News

Fremantle Ports to trial project to…

Fremantle Ports has partnered with Byssal and DevelopmentWA to trial an innovative nature-based pilo...

Culture

Is Fast Food Really Food?

It is a question that sounds provocative, but it goes to the heart of a growing debate about what ...

Travel

Overtourism: Why Some of the World's Mos…

For decades, attracting more visitors was the goal of tourism authorities around the world. More t...

The Times Features

Is Fast Food Really Food?

It is a question that sounds provocative, but it goes to the heart of a growing debate about what ...

Ultra-Processed Foods: The Hidden Ingredient in the Mod…

Walk through almost any Australian supermarket and much of what fills the shelves has one thing in...

Is Red Wine Good for the Human Body?

Red wine has long enjoyed a reputation as the healthiest alcoholic drink. From the vineyards of Fr...