The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Even if Qantas is fined hundreds of millions it is likely to continue to take us for granted

  • Written by Mel Marquis, Deputy Associate Dean and Senior Lecturer in Law, Monash University
Even if Qantas is fined hundreds of millions it is likely to continue to take us for granted

As Qantas faces up to tough questioning from a Senate committee and a claim from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) for as much as A$600 million[1] for allegedly selling tickets on more than 8,000[2] “ghost flights” it had already cancelled, its customers might be thinking things are about to get better.

But there are reasons to think they won’t. At the heart of both the ACCC’s lawsuit[3], and the airline’s separate refusal to quickly refund hundreds of millions of dollars worth of credits[4] for flights cancelled during COVID, lies the indifference to customers typical of a duopolistic market.

Qantas does face competition on international routes, although the government’s action in denying Qatar Airways extra landing rights has constrained[5] that competition.

But, with only one exception – Virgin – it faces very little competition within Australia, given the limited offerings by airlines such as Rex and Bonza.

On Wednesday former ACCC Chair Rod Sims told the Senate inquiry into air service agreements[6] Qantas was able to use its leading market position to charge higher prices than it would otherwise have been able to.

One could put it more generally: Qantas had the power to treat customers worse than it would otherwise have been able to.

What the ACCC alleges

The ACCC alleges Qantas engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct in breach of the Australian Consumer Law in 2022 by selling tickets for flights that had already been cancelled, and by falsely representing to consumers who already had tickets that their flights had not been cancelled.

Under the law, where liability for “misleading or deceptive conduct” is concerned, the reasons for the conduct don’t matter, meaning all that is likely to matter is whether the commission’s claims about Qantas’s conduct are true.

Section 18[7] of the Australian Consumer Law simply says:

a person must not, in trade or commerce, engage in conduct that is misleading or deceptive or is likely to mislead or deceive.

For online bookings, the commission is suggesting Qantas may have made several misleading representations, including indicating flights were available when they were not, confirming bookings for flights that were not available, and displaying unavailable flights on customers’ “manage booking” pages.

While the ticket contracts may have included disclaimers, these would be unlikely to have force in the face of Section 18. The law does not permit contractual language to exclude liability for contraventions of this provision.

A disclaimer can be relevant to the factual question of whether a party was misled but, given 98%[8] of online consumer contracts are unread, it’s unlikely Qantas would be able to rely on disclaimers to claim customers weren’t misled.

Read more: Booking customers on cancelled flights – how could Qantas do that?[9]

Even if the commission is successful in getting the Federal Court to award a penalty amounting to hundreds of millions, such a fine is likely to be manageable for Qantas given its $1.7 billion[10] 2022-23 profit.

Qantas chair Richard Goyder at the Senate hearing. Lukas Coch/AAP

Qantas ill-prepared for questions

At Wednesday’s Senate hearing Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson and Chairman Richard Goyder were not prepared to answer several questions, asking for them to be put on notice.

They also passed up the opportunity to provide the committee with a written statement addressing the formal topic[11] of its inquiry which was the impact of government decisions about landing rights on competition in the aviation industry and the cost of living pressures on Australian families and businesses.

Pressed on whether Qantas would publish a redacted version of its representations to the government about foreign airlines’ bids for landing rights, Hudson declined, although she said Qantas would provide them in confidence.

Goyder told the hearing Qantas had “genuine contrition for where we are at” but had “sound commercial reasons” for many of the decisions it took during the years since the outbreak of COVID, including what the High Court subsequently found was an illegal decision[12] to sack 1,700 ground staff.

Read more: High Court ruling vindicates sacked Qantas workers but doesn't stop the outsourcing of jobs in the future[13]

What matters to Qantas is slots

While there is little that can be done to make Qantas more responsive to its customers while it dominates the domestic aviation market, freeing up landing slots[14] at airports would help loosen that dominance.

The current rules allow incumbent airlines such as Qantas to apply for more slots at airports such as Sydney than they will require, so long as they use them 80% of the time.

In a report to the government in 2021 former Productivity Commission chief Peter Harris recommended overhauling the system at Sydney Airport to make it easier[15] for new entrants to get slots.

Among the recommendations was an independent audit of cancellations by a “reputable, unconflicted auditor”.

The government has yet to respond to the report, although when releasing the government’s aviation green paper earlier this month, Transport Minister Catherine King indicated she soon would.

Implementing needed reforms to free up slots at key airports would help to promote better consumer outcomes. However, profound change in Australian air travel seems unlikely for the foreseeable future.

References

  1. ^ A$600 million (www.bandt.com.au)
  2. ^ 8,000 (www.accc.gov.au)
  3. ^ lawsuit (www.bandt.com.au)
  4. ^ credits (www.afr.com)
  5. ^ constrained (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ Senate inquiry into air service agreements (www.aph.gov.au)
  7. ^ Section 18 (gibbswrightlawyers.com.au)
  8. ^ 98% (www.tandfonline.com)
  9. ^ Booking customers on cancelled flights – how could Qantas do that? (theconversation.com)
  10. ^ $1.7 billion (www.abc.net.au)
  11. ^ formal topic (www.aph.gov.au)
  12. ^ illegal decision (www.abc.net.au)
  13. ^ High Court ruling vindicates sacked Qantas workers but doesn't stop the outsourcing of jobs in the future (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ freeing up landing slots (www.accc.gov.au)
  15. ^ easier (www.infrastructure.gov.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/even-if-qantas-is-fined-hundreds-of-millions-it-is-likely-to-continue-to-take-us-for-granted-213754

The Times Features

Black Rock is a popular beachside suburb

Black Rock is indeed a popular beachside suburb, located in the southeastern suburbs of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. It’s known for its stunning beaches, particularly Half M...

What factors affect whether or not a person is approved for a property loan

Several factors determine whether a person is approved for a real estate loan. These factors help lenders assess the borrower’s ability to repay the loan and the risk involved...

The Affordable Protein Solution

With the cost-of-living crisis hitting Australians hard, many are making New Year’s resolutions to get fitter and healthier without breaking the bank.  Amid rising food costs, ...

Does the Sydney property market still offer rewarding investment opportunities

Investing in Sydney’s property market has historically offered rewarding returns, characterized by consistent capital growth and strong rental demand. Since the 1980s, Sydney’s ave...

Cadastral Land Survey: Defining Property Boundaries with Precision

A cadastral land survey, or cadastral boundary survey. is vital in managing lands and property ownership. Such surveys are a specific sort of study that is vital in identifying t...

Move over mānuka – here are 5 other delicious native NZ honeys to try this summer

As I write, the summer landscape is bright with pōhutukawa flowers. Sitting in the shade of the “New Zealand Christmas tree”, I can hear bees humming as they move between flowe...

Times Magazine

Aussies, Clear Out Old Phones –Turn Them into Cash Now!

Still, holding onto that old phone in your drawer? You’re not alone. Upgrading to the latest iPhone is exciting, but figuring out what to do with the old one can be a hassle. The good news? Your old iPhone isn’t just sitting there it’s potential ca...

Rain or Shine: Why Promotional Umbrellas Are a Must-Have for Aussie Brands

In Australia, where the weather can swing from scorching sun to sudden downpours, promotional umbrellas are more than just handy—they’re marketing gold. We specialise in providing wholesale custom umbrellas that combine function with branding power. ...

Why Should WACE Students Get a Tutor?

The Western Australian Certificate of Education (WACE) is completed by thousands of students in West Australia every year. Each year, the pressure increases for students to perform. Student anxiety is at an all time high so students are seeking suppo...

What Are the Risks of Hiring a Private Investigator

I’m a private investigator based in Melbourne, Australia. Being a Melbourne Pi always brings interesting clients throughout Melbourne. Many of these clients always ask me what the risks are of hiring a private investigator.  Legal Risks One of the ...

7 Reasons Why You Need to Hire an SEO Expert for Your Business

Ranking on Google isn’t just an option—it's essential for business success. Many businesses striving for online visibility often struggle to keep up with the complex and ever-changing world of search engine optimisation (SEO). Partnering with an SE...

Licence Suspension in NSW: Key Causes and Preventative Measures

Driving is more than just a convenience; it's a crucial part of daily life, enabling individuals to commute to work, attend appointments, and partake in social activities. In New South Wales (NSW), adhering to road rules is not just about maintai...

LayBy Shopping