why warnings over grid reliability are really about building more transmission lines
- Written by Tony Wood, Program Director, Energy, Grattan Institute
“To ensure Australian consumers continue to have access to reliable electricity supplies, it’s critical that planned investments in transmission, generation and storage projects are urgently delivered.”
This week, we heard one of the strongest warnings yet from Daniel Westerman, head of the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).
So far, media coverage has framed his comments[1] as a warning about the anticipated angry El Niño summer, which is likely to drive energy-intensive aircon use even as our coal plants become less and less reliable.
But this isn’t what the warning is really about. It’s about transmission lines and our sluggish pace of change. Australia’s emissions are falling much more slowly[2] than we’d like to think, if we omit the sometimes controversial land use sector. We’re down just 1.6% below 2005 levels.
Solar and wind farm investment has slowed markedly. This is because we don’t have the right grid – yet. Building the transmission infrastructure needed to slash emissions by 2030 means acting much faster than government is used to.
These aren’t ordinary times. We can’t act as if they are.
Read more: Australia's energy market operator is worried about the grid's reliability. But should it be?[3]
The grid will withstand summer – but bigger threats lie ahead
It’s quite likely the grid will withstand this summer, as long as maintenance is done to keep the old coal clunkers running and to ensure gas peaking plants are ready for times of highest demand. We also have the reserve system[4], whereby big energy users can be paid not to consume electricity during the hottest days.
There’s no shortage of solar and wind resources in Australia. And there’s no shortage of solar and wind farm projects waiting to be built. But the great renewable build is stalling[5] – not because there’s no demand for cheap power, but because regulatory approvals are too slow and there’s no way to get the power to the cities and heavy industries.
The real problem is we’re not moving fast enough to build the unsexy but vital infrastructure we need: new transmission lines[6]. The old grid was built around big power stations, from hydro in the Snowy Mountains to coal plants near coal mines, with transmission lines connecting them to cities.
But renewable-rich zones are often in different places. What’s more, shifting to a grid full of renewables means building more interconnectors between states, so on a big day for Victoria’s mooted offshore wind farms, for instance, the surplus power can be sent to South Australia, New South Wales and Queensland too.
What’s the delay? After all, we were able to build transmission lines when the current grid was taking shape.
Read more: A clean energy grid means 10,000km of new transmission lines. They can only be built with community backing[7]
A big part of the issue is community pushback and process. Local farmers and communities are resisting[8] many of the planned new transmission lines.
If we had the luxury of time, it might be possible to get strong community support. But we don’t. Our coal plants are on the way out and no one is going[9] to build a new one. The barrier between us and a clean energy future is getting transmission and storage built, fast.
Labor went to the 2022 election with a $20 billion plan[10] to build the transmission lines envisaged by AEMO in its latest integrated system plan[11].
Westerman last year listed the five most urgent[12] transmission links:
HumeLink to bring Snowy 2.0 pumped hydro power to the grid
the Sydney Ring, designed to improve connections between New South Wales’ four largest population centres, Sydney, the Central Coast, Newcastle and Wollongong
transmission links from the New England renewable energy zone
the Marinus link to better connect Tasmania’s wealth of hydro with the mainland
the KerangLink interconnector between Victoria and New South Wales.
Most of these projects have had their own issues, ranging from lengthy approval processes, to heated community calls[13] to put lines underground, to cost blowouts.
One problem is the range of government agencies involved. There’s no single body responsible for making these nation-building projects happen as quickly and happily as possible.
Transmission lines are vital – but often unpopular.
Shutterstock
How can we speed up these vital projects?
Here are a few ideas:
compensate affected landholders. Farmers who agree to host transmission towers get paid. To smooth the build, governments could bite the bullet and expand whom they compensate. Or, as with many other major infrastructure projects, as a last resort, they could compulsorily acquire the easements
give one agency the responsibility and authority for making these essential projects happen
ramp up regional training centres to produce the skilled electrical workers we’ll need.
We’ve come a fair way down the road in our efforts to wean ourselves off coal, and, eventually, gas-fired electricity. But it could all be for nought if we don’t get transmission sorted as soon as possible.
Read more: 5 policy decisions from recent history that led to today's energy crisis[14]
References
- ^ his comments (www.abc.net.au)
- ^ falling much more slowly (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ Australia's energy market operator is worried about the grid's reliability. But should it be? (theconversation.com)
- ^ reserve system (aemo.com.au)
- ^ is stalling (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ new transmission lines (www.aemo.com.au)
- ^ A clean energy grid means 10,000km of new transmission lines. They can only be built with community backing (theconversation.com)
- ^ resisting (theconversation.com)
- ^ no one is going (reneweconomy.com.au)
- ^ $20 billion plan (www.aph.gov.au)
- ^ integrated system plan (aemo.com.au)
- ^ five most urgent (www.theguardian.com)
- ^ heated community calls (www.9news.com.au)
- ^ 5 policy decisions from recent history that led to today's energy crisis (theconversation.com)
