Wed Aug 17

ending abuse and violence is a marathon effort

Written by: Mary Iliadis, Senior Lecturer in Criminology, Deakin University

Two women on a training run through a park

For events like the upcoming Nike Melbourne Marathon Festival ^[1], thousands of people need to put in many weeks of training to prepare themselves. Yet for many female runners, the feeling of liberation that running can bring is marred by the ever-present threat of street harassment and violence.

As sociologist Fiona Vera Grey has observed ^[2]:

“Women and girls are routinely having to evaluate what the right amount of panic is, to direct their movements and actions in public spaces.”

The threat of harm deters some women from running in public. They know they are likely to be harassed ^[3] if they do.

Research ^[4] shows sexual abuse is the most common form of street harassment. It includes a long list of offensive behaviours ^[5]: “catcalling, kissing noises, horn honking, staring or leering, following someone, unwanted conversation (for example, repeated requests for a date or phone number), sexualised gestures, frottage [rubbing against another person in a crowd for sexual gratification], unwanted touching, indecent exposure, and public masturbation”.

These harms are overwhelmingly perpetrated by men against women. In Australia, the Personal Safety Survey ^[6] found one in two women (53%) had experienced sexual harassment during their lifetime. That’s more than twice the rate for men (25%).

Women also face real threats to their safety in public spaces from current or former partners. One in six women (17%) – compared to one in 15 men (7%) – have been stalked since the age of 15. And 75% of them were stalked by someone they knew.

The harms can be physical, but they also have emotional, psychological and financial consequences – including the costs of missing work to support health and wellbeing. Globally, the public, private and social cost of violence against women has been estimated at US$1.5 trillion ^[7].

Why aren’t public spaces safe for women?

Women are participating in running in record numbers ^[9] in Australia. As with many sport and recreational activities, they commonly use public spaces for running. However, several barriers hinder women’s ability to run safely, including:

traditional gendered stereotypes that characterise women’s activities as within the household, including expectations that they are nurturing, child-rearing and “weaker” than men, implying physical inferiority
men designed ^[10] and built ^[11] many public spaces, which has implications for how women use public spaces
a lack of investment in science supporting female athletes has limited understandings of women’s physiology and performance
sports marketing strategies have historically prioritised men over women, meaning social constructions and understandings of running tend to centre on male athletes
there has been a lack of funding and educational opportunities ^[12] supporting women in sport.

Many factors make running in public spaces less safe for women than it should be. Photo by Rene Mitchell-Pitman

In 1967, Katherine Switzer ^[14] laced up as the first woman to run the Boston Marathon at a time when women were not allowed to compete. Even her coach had resisted the idea, claiming “the distance was too long for fragile women to run ^[15]”.

Since then, the rise of women’s movements has advanced their participation in the public realm generally, but women are still not truly empowered to occupy and run in public spaces.

We are all responsible for making public places safe

Many suggest “strategies” that put the onus of responsibility for women’s safety entirely on them.

Too often, women are encouraged to protect themselves by:

not wearing headphones
not running in the dark, in unfamiliar places or unaccompanied
taking their phone or having location services turned on.

The same precautions are not required of men. In this sense, Simone’s de Beauvoir’s 1949 saying ^[17] holds true: “Humanity is male and man defines woman not in herself, but as relative to him; she is not regarded as an autonomous being.”

Everyone has a role to play in calling out and putting an end to sinister or suspicious behaviours when a woman’s safety is, or may be, compromised. More specifically, it is important that men feel a responsibility to call out harassment and use their platform as beneficiaries of male privilege to make women feel safe and included. For example, they could ask a woman to join a group run if they know she may be running alone.

An inclusive running community helps make running in public places safer. The Hunter Athletics and Recreation community is an example of this. Photo: Mary Iliadis, Author provided

Local running communities can likewise encourage women’s participation and enhance feelings of safety. In Melbourne, for instance, the FEMMI ^[18] community brings together recreational female runners on a weekly basis to foster an inclusive and safe environment. Other Melbourne running groups such as Hunter Athletics and Recreation ^[19], AM:PM.RC ^[20] and UpThere Athletics ^[21]] also offer weekly group runs.

State and local governments also have a responsibility to better integrate women’s voices in the design and planning of public spaces to ensure they are safe and functional for everyone. More targeted community engagement will help achieve this.

Ultimately, a collective onus of responsibility is needed to encourage women’s safe participation in running.