In 20 years of studying how ecosystems absorb carbon, here's why we're worried about a tipping point of collapse
- Written by: Caitlin Moore, Research Fellow, The University of Western Australia
From rainforests to savannas, ecosystems on land absorb almost 30%[1] of the carbon dioxide human activities release into the atmosphere. These ecosystems are critical to stop the planet warming beyond 1.5℃ this century – but climate change may be weakening their capacity to offset global emissions.
This is a key issue that OzFlux[2], a research network from Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand, has been investigating for the past 20 years. Over this time, we’ve identified which ecosystems absorb the most carbon, and have been learning how they respond to extreme weather and climate events such as drought, floods and bushfires.
The biggest absorbers of atmospheric carbon dioxide in Australia are savannas and temperate forests. But as the effects of climate change intensify, ecosystems such as these are at risk of reaching tipping points of collapse[3].
In our latest research paper[4], we look back at the two decades of OzFlux’s findings. So far, the ecosystems we studied are showing resilience by rapidly pivoting back to being carbon sinks after a disturbance. This can be seen, for example, in leaves growing back on trees soon after bushfire.
But how long will this resilience remain? As climate change pressures intensify, evidence suggests carbon sinks may lose their ability to bounce back from climate-related disasters. This reveals vital gaps in our knowledge.
Australian ecosystems absorb 150 million tonnes of carbon each year
Between 2011 and 2020, land-based ecosystems sequestered 11.2 billion tonnes[5] (29%) of global CO₂ emissions. To put this into perspective, that’s roughly similar[6] to the amount China emitted in 2021.
OzFlux has enabled the first comprehensive assessment of Australia’s carbon budget[7] from 1990 to 2011. This found Australia’s land-based ecosystems accumulate some 150 million tonnes of CO₂ each year on average – helping to offset national fossil fuel emissions by around one third.
For example, every hectare of Australia’s temperate forests absorbs 3.9 tonnes of carbon in a year, according to OzFlux data[8]. Likewise, every hectare of Australia’s savanna absorbs 3.4 tonnes of carbon. This is about 100 times larger than a hectare of Mediterranean woodland or shrubland.
But it’s important to note that the amount of carbon Australian ecosystems can sequester fluctuates widely from one year to the next. This is due to, for instance, the natural climate variability (such as in La Niña or El Niño years), and disturbances (such as fire and land use changes).
In any case, it’s clear these ecosystems will play an important role in Australia reaching its target of net-zero emissions by 2050. But how effective will they continue to be as the climate changes?
How climate change weakens these carbon sinks
Extreme climate variability – flooding rains[9], droughts[10] and heatwaves[11] – along with bushfires and land clearing, can weaken these carbon sinks.
Read more: 'Flash droughts' can dry out soil in weeks. New research shows what they look like in Australia[12]
While many Australian ecosystems show resilience to these stresses, we found their recovery time may be shortening due to more frequent and extreme events, potentially compromising their long-term contribution towards offsetting emissions.
Take bushfire as an example. When it burns a forest, the carbon stored in the plants is released back into the atmosphere as smoke - so the ecosystem becomes a carbon source. Likewise, under drought or heatwave conditions, water available to the roots becomes depleted and limits photosynthesis, which can tip a forest’s carbon budget from being a sink to a carbon source.
If that drought or heatwave endures for a long time, or a bushfire returns before the forest has recovered, its ability to regain its carbon sink status is at risk.
Learning how carbon sinks may shift in Australia and New Zealand can have a global impact. Both countries are home to a broad range of climates – from the wet tropics, to the Mediterranean climate of southwest Australia, to the temperate climate in the southeast.
Our unique ecosystems have evolved to suit these diverse climates, which are underrepresented in the global network.
This means long-term ecosystem observatories – OzFlux[13], along with the Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network[14] – provide a vital natural laboratory for understanding ecosystems in this era of accelerating climate change.
Over its 20 years, OzFlux has made crucial contributions to the international understanding of climate change. A few of its major findings include:
Each hectare of Australia’s savanna’s sequesters, on average, 3.4 tonnes of carbon every year.
Bryn Pinzgauer/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA[15]
Critical questions remain
Plans in Australia and New Zealand to reach net zero emissions by 2050 strongly depend on the ongoing ability for ecosystems to sequester emissions from industry, agriculture, transport and the electricity sectors.
While some management and technological innovations are underway to address this, such as in the agricultural sector[16], we need long-term measurements of carbon cycling to truly understand the limits of ecosystems[17] and their risk of collapse[18].
Read more: US scheme used by Australian farmers reveals the dangers of trading soil carbon to tackle climate change[19]
Indeed, we’re already in uncharted territory under climate change. Weather extremes from heatwaves[20] to heavy rainfall are becoming more frequent and intense. And CO₂ levels are more than 50% higher[21] than they were 200 years ago.
When it comes to science, more frequent disasters mean we’re in unchartered territory.
AAP Image/Dan Himbrechts
So while our ecosystems have remained a net sink over the last 20 years[22], it’s worth asking:
will they continue to do the heavy-lifting required to keep both countries on track to meet their climate targets?
how do we protect, restore and sustain the most vital, yet vulnerable, ecosystems, such as “coastal blue carbon[23]” (including seagrasses and mangroves)? These are critical to nature-based solutions to climate change
how do we monitor and verify national carbon accounting schemes, such as Australia’s Emissions Reduction Fund[24]?
Critical questions remain about how well Australia’s and New Zealand’s ecosystems can continue storing CO₂.
Read more: 'Existential threat to our survival': see the 19 Australian ecosystems already collapsing[25]
References
- ^ almost 30% (www.globalcarbonproject.org)
- ^ OzFlux (www.ozflux.org.au)
- ^ collapse (theconversation.com)
- ^ research paper (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
- ^ 11.2 billion tonnes (www.globalcarbonproject.org)
- ^ roughly similar (www.iea.org)
- ^ Australia’s carbon budget (bg.copernicus.org)
- ^ according to OzFlux data (bg.copernicus.org)
- ^ flooding rains (theconversation.com)
- ^ droughts (theconversation.com)
- ^ heatwaves (theconversation.com)
- ^ 'Flash droughts' can dry out soil in weeks. New research shows what they look like in Australia (theconversation.com)
- ^ OzFlux (bg.copernicus.org)
- ^ Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (www.tern.org.au)
- ^ CC BY-SA (creativecommons.org)
- ^ agricultural sector (theconversation.com)
- ^ limits of ecosystems (theconversation.com)
- ^ risk of collapse (theconversation.com)
- ^ US scheme used by Australian farmers reveals the dangers of trading soil carbon to tackle climate change (theconversation.com)
- ^ heatwaves (theconversation.com)
- ^ 50% higher (www.bom.gov.au)
- ^ last 20 years (bg.copernicus.org)
- ^ coastal blue carbon (www.nature.com)
- ^ Emissions Reduction Fund (www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au)
- ^ 'Existential threat to our survival': see the 19 Australian ecosystems already collapsing (theconversation.com)
