The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

Once a form of ‘social camouflage’, school uniforms have become impractical and unfair. Why it’s time for a makeover

  • Written by Johanna Reidy, Lecturer, Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine, University of Otago
Once a form of ‘social camouflage’, school uniforms have become impractical and unfair. Why it’s time for a makeover

As the start of a new school year looms, school uniforms are being dusted off or new ones bought. At the same time, age-old debates about the pros and cons of school uniforms are being dusted off, too.

But questions about practicality, cost or conformity tend to overshadow the bigger underlying issue of how uniforms – and rules about wearing them – actually affect educational outcomes.

In other words, does wearing (or not wearing) a uniform contribute to students being mentally well, physically comfortable, healthy and active – and therefore better equipped to learn?

After all, academic learning is a key reason children go to school in the first place. Given the heated arguments and the insistence on particular types of garments being worn, we might expect uniforms to directly enhance academic performance.

They don’t. There is no persuasive evidence that school uniforms are among the factors that directly improve learning[1]. However, there is evidence uniforms might indirectly support classroom management[2] – for example, by helping remove distractions so students settle more quickly to their tasks.

Instead of arguing about whether uniforms are good or bad, then, let’s refocus our energy on making better garment designs and fairer school uniform rules, with an eye to supporting educational outcomes.

Uniforms as a form of class disguise: an illustration of students in a classroom from The Illustrated London News in 1891. GettyImages

From equality to equity

Since there’s no direct link between uniforms and academic achievement, why insist on dressing students the same? History provides some of the answer.

In the 19th century, when school uniforms became common alongside compulsory education, a kind of equality was achieved by treating all students the same. Uniforms provided “social camouflage[3]” by removing outward signs of class differences.

One enduring benefit of school uniforms is that they reduce “competitive dressing” by students – the social pressure to wear certain clothes.

Read more: Does wearing a school uniform improve student behavior?[4]

Nowadays, however, the debate about uniforms sidesteps the issue of how treating students the same is not necessarily the same as treating them fairly. In fact, the research highlights a need for equity: to achieve more equal outcomes can require treating students differently.

Logically, if equality and sameness were directly correlated, school uniforms and school uniform policies should have a neutral or positive impact on all students. But this isn’t the case[5].

Garment design or policies about which garments can be worn when and by whom disadvantage poorer students, girls, religious minorities and gender-diverse students. Together, these student groups make up over half the school population.

Studies have shown girls are more active when wearing a sports uniform. Shutterstock

Students are not uniform

We know uniforms are less expensive than non-uniform alternatives over a student’s total school career. But the high upfront cost of uniforms can be a significant burden[6] for students from low-income families.

Some students even attend on alternate days because they share a uniform with a sibling[7], or skip school until they can buy a missing uniform item. It’s a sad irony that the very tool meant to encourage equal access to education has become a barrier for some even before they walk through the school gates.

But beyond the cost, uniform design and policy can directly affect girls’ ability to participate in physical activity[8] or lunchtime play[9].

Read more: Why do schools want all students to look the same?[10]

At a basic level, boys simply don’t risk flashing their underwear if they bike to school in regulation uniform. By contrast, girls’ uniforms often restrict a full range of movement and inhibit playtime sports or the ability to enjoy the jungle gym.

Studies have shown girls are more active when wearing a sports uniform (over and above timetabled sport) than on ordinary uniform days, and are more willing to bike[11] or choose active transport[12] if they have a sports-style uniform.

For older girls, feeling comfortable and not exposed is a key factor in participating in sports or games at break times. Yet some schools still offer no alternative choice to a skirt. For overweight children, unflattering clothing can create a disincentive[13] to participating in physical activity.

Religious minority groups, despite being members of the school community, are often not accommodated by school uniform design and policy. And inflexible school uniform policies routinely ignore the needs of transgender students.

Read more: 4 reasons schools should let students wear sports uniforms every day[14]

Better uniforms for better learning

Clearly, same treatment no longer means fair treatment. We should rethink our approach to equity and allow for flexibility to achieve similar outcomes.

Indeed, all students could benefit from a general rethink, from ensuring uniform garments are sun-safe[15] to allowing students to dress for the weather conditions. There’s no need to freeze during an unseasonable cold snap in November simply because it’s school policy that summer uniforms must be worn in summer months.

Ultimately, we should get beyond binary debates about whether school uniforms are good or bad, and focus on improving uniform garments and policies with equity, well-being and fairness in mind.

This means designing uniforms that are comfortable to wear, allow free movement, permit physical activity and encourage active transport choices to and from school.

Above all, uniform wearing should support mental and physical comfort and, most importantly, learning.

References

  1. ^ directly improve learning (visible-learning.org)
  2. ^ classroom management (researchers.mq.edu.au)
  3. ^ social camouflage (www.tandfonline.com)
  4. ^ Does wearing a school uniform improve student behavior? (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ isn’t the case (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  6. ^ significant burden (link.springer.com)
  7. ^ share a uniform with a sibling (www.schoolnews.co.nz)
  8. ^ physical activity (www.tandfonline.com)
  9. ^ lunchtime play (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  10. ^ Why do schools want all students to look the same? (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ willing to bike (www.tandfonline.com)
  12. ^ choose active transport (www.researchgate.net)
  13. ^ disincentive (journals.sagepub.com)
  14. ^ 4 reasons schools should let students wear sports uniforms every day (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ sun-safe (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)

Read more https://theconversation.com/once-a-form-of-social-camouflage-school-uniforms-have-become-impractical-and-unfair-why-its-time-for-a-makeover-175320

Active Wear

Times Magazine

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

The Times Features

After 2 years of devastating war, will Arab countries now turn their backs on Israel?

The Middle East has long been riddled by instability. This makes getting a sense of the broader...

RBA keeps interest rates on hold, leaving borrowers looking further ahead for relief

As expected, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has kept the cash rate steady at 3.6%[1]. Its b...

Crystalbrook Collection Introduces ‘No Rings Attached’: Australia’s First Un-Honeymoon for Couples

Why should newlyweds have all the fun? As Australia’s crude marriage rate falls to a 20-year low, ...

Echoes of the Past: Sue Carter Brings Ancient Worlds to Life at Birli Gallery

Launching November 15 at 6pm at Birli Gallery, Midland, Echoes of the Past marks the highly anti...

Why careless adoption of AI backfires so easily

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly becoming commonplace, despite statistics showing[1] th...

How airline fares are set and should we expect lower fares any time soon?

Airline ticket prices may seem mysterious (why is the same flight one price one day, quite anoth...

What is the American public’s verdict on the first year of Donald Trump’s second term as President?

In short: the verdict is decidedly mixed, leaning negative. Trump’s overall job-approval ra...

A Camping Holiday Used to Be Affordable — Not Any Longer: Why the Cost of Staying at a Caravan Park Is Rising

For generations, the humble camping or caravan holiday has been the backbone of the great Austra...

Australia after the Trump–Xi meeting: sector-by-sector opportunities, risks, and realistic scenarios

How the U.S.–China thaw could play out across key sectors, with best case / base case / downside...