Tue Jan 25

Australia and Norway were once tied in global anti-corruption rankings. Now, we're heading in opposite directions

Written by A J Brown, Professor of Public Policy & Law, Centre for Governance & Public Policy, Griffith University

In a worrying sign, Australia has plummeted in Transparency International’s latest Corruption Perceptions Index ^[1] – the world’s most widely cited ranking of how clean or corrupt every country’s public sector is believed to be.

In the 2021 index released today ^[2], Australia has repeated its largest-ever annual drop – falling four points on the 100-point scale, from 77 to 73. Zero is considered highly corrupt, while a score of 100 is very clean.

Overall, Australia has dropped 12 points on the index since 2012, more than any OECD country apart from Hungary, which also fell 12 points. Australia’s rate of decline is also similar or steeper than other countries with far worse issues, including Cyprus, Lebanon, Syria and Venezuela.

Australia was ranked seventh in the world in 2012, level with Norway. This year, Australia has fallen to 18th out of 180 countries. In contrast, Norway’s global standing has improved, climbing from seventh to fourth on the index.

It’s a clear sign Australia has missed a huge chance to correct our failing anti-corruption reputation. And this will likely continue to fall unless integrity policies are turned around at this year’s federal election.

Author provided What the index shows The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is compiled annually by Transparency International using the most credible, independent, long-running corruption measures in the world. Sources ^[3] include the Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, the World Justice Project and the World Bank. These surveys focus on levels of public sector corruption, as well as the strength of mechanisms for preventing and controlling corruption. This makes the index not simply a list of which countries are more or less corrupt, but also an evaluation of their current anti-corruption efforts. The CPI is recognised as a key indicator of Australia’s integrity performance – not only by reform advocates, but by the federal government itself. Read more: As a NSW premier falls and SA guts its anti-corruption commission, what are the lessons for integrity bodies in Australia?^[4] In September 2018, then-Attorney-General Christian Porter famously tried to defend the nation’s anti-corruption record by telling parliament ^[5] the CPI had placed Australia “consistently in the top 20 countries on Earth for low corruption”. It took Centre Alliance MP Rebekha Sharkie to point out ^[6] Australia used to be not only in the top 20, but the top ten. Instead of maintaining its high score, like Norway, Australia has gone in the other direction – and it now risks falling out of the top 20 altogether.

Author provided Australia had the chance to stem the fall Before this year, Australia’s score on the index had levelled off as the federal government finally made pledges to address integrity issues and other efforts to root out corruption took place. In that period, there was hope things might turn around: corrupt politicians and officials were successfully convicted in several states (including NSW’s prosecution ^[7] of former ministers Eddie Obeid and Ian Macdonald, while action was taken against local government corruption ^[8] in Queensland)

Former Labor minister Eddie Obeid was sentenced last year to seven years over a rigged mining tender. Bianca de Marchi/AAP after many years, the major parties finally pledged to establish a federal integrity commission (Labor in February 2018 ^[9] and the Coalition in December 2018 ^[10]) long-overdue legislation was introduced to parliament to enhance laws against bribery of foreign officials ^[11] bipartisan recommendations were made to strengthen whistleblower protections ^[12], with new laws on private sector whistleblowing and promises of reform for the federal public sector high-profile federal enforcement action was taken against money laundering through Australian banks ^[13], while growing evidence of money laundering in casinos and real estate raised hopes of further reform. But the last year has seen progress stalled The latest drop in the CPI shows business and expert confidence in Australia’s official responses to corruption has collapsed again. Since 2020, when the data for this year’s index were mostly collected, the expected progress has not happened. Instead, Australia has seen:

Bridget McKenzie during 'sports rorts' inquiry

Bridget McKenzie quit the front bench and resigned as deputy Nationals leader after the so-called ‘sports rorts’ affair. Mick Tsikas/AAP

NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian announcing her resignation last October. Bianca de Marchi/AAP Why leadership is key It doesn’t have to be this way. Transparency International has used this year’s global index ^[14] to highlight the need for countries to improve checks and balances through strong integrity institutions and to uphold people’s rights to hold those in power to account. When countries show serious leadership in anti-corruption reform – such as the United Kingdom during David Cameron’s Conservative government from 2012–17 - their scores on the index can climb. Clearly, the world now fears this type of leadership is lacking in Australia. The priorities and potential solutions are increasingly understood by experts, observers and the community. For example, Griffith University and Transparency International Australia recently assessed Australia’s national integrity system and developed a reform blueprint ^[15] to follow. With the 2022 federal election now just months away, the quality of the parties’ anti-corruption commitments – and leaders’ willingness to implement them – will matter as never before. Key issues still hang in the balance. As recently as November, the prime minister and attorney-general revealed ^[16] they were shelving any improvements to their Commonwealth integrity commission plan. This announcement came despite the government having spent yet another year consulting over the plan’s obvious problems ^[17]. Read more: Explainer: what is the proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission and how would it work?^[18] Anti-corruption reform is no longer the “fringe issue ^[19]” Prime Minister Scott Morrison claimed it was several years ago. For confidence in Australia’s public integrity to improve, the winner of the election is going to need to promise – and deliver – more convincing solutions than we’ve seen in the last two years. References^{^} Corruption Perceptions Index (transparency.org.au)^{^} 2021 index released today (www.transparency.org)^{^} Sources (www.transparency.org)^{^} As a NSW premier falls and SA guts its anti-corruption commission, what are the lessons for integrity bodies in Australia? (theconversation.com)^{^} telling parliament (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)^{^} point out (parlinfo.aph.gov.au)^{^} prosecution (www.abc.net.au)^{^} local government corruption (www.brisbanetimes.com.au)^{^} February 2018 (www.theguardian.com)^{^} December 2018 (www.abc.net.au)^{^} bribery of foreign officials (www.corrs.com.au)^{^} strengthen whistleblower protections (theconversation.com)^{^} Australian banks (www.abc.net.au)^{^} this year’s global index (www.transparency.org)^{^} reform blueprint (transparency.org.au)^{^} revealed (ministers.ag.gov.au)^{^} the plan’s obvious problems (transparency.org.au)^{^} Explainer: what is the proposed Commonwealth Integrity Commission and how would it work? (theconversation.com)^{^} fringe issue (www.theguardian.com)

Times Magazine

Technology

Local News

Culture

Travel

The Times Features