The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
Times Media

.

Is salt good for you after all? The evidence says no

  • Written by Clare Collins, Laureate Professor in Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Newcastle
Is salt good for you after all? The evidence says no

Salt[1] is the most common form of sodium and is added to food during manufacturing, home cooking or at the table to enhance the taste or to extend the shelf life.

Most people have heard the advice to cut down on salt[2]. That’s because high sodium intakes are associated with high blood pressure[3], a major risk factor for cardiovascular disease, heart attacks and strokes.

So the recent headline[4] “Food myths busted: dairy, salt and steak may be good for you after all” was bound to grab-attention.

In the research article this headline is based on[5], the authors examined whether advice to substantially lower sodium intakes was supported by robust evidence.

The article’s premise is that current advice to limit sodium consumption to 2.3 grams a day is unachievable for most people in the long term. And it claims there isn’t good quality evidence to show lower salt intakes reduce the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

The authors suggest that current global sodium intakes, which range from 3-5 grams per day, are associated with the lowest risks for a heart attack, stroke or dying prematurely. And that heart attacks and strokes increase only when sodium intakes are higher or lower than this.

The researchers argue there’s a ‘sweet spot’ for salt intake and heart disease risk. Andrew Mente, Martin O’Donnell, and Salim Yusuf. Nutrients 2021, 13(9), 3232, CC BY[6][7]

But there are a number of controversies about these claims, and the existing advice to limit salt consumption remains. Lets take a closer a look at some of the issues associated with these claims, as well as important research the authors missed.

Most of us could afford to cut down on salt

One teaspoon of salt weighs around 5 grams and contains 2 grams of sodium.

Australians consume about 3.6 grams of sodium per day, equivalent to 9.2 grams (about 2 teaspoons) of table salt.

This is higher than the suggested dietary target[8] of 2 grams of sodium (5 grams of salt) per day and the adequate intake[9] range of 460-920 milligrams (1.3-2.6 grams of salt) a day.

Read more: Health Check: how much salt is OK to eat?[10]

Sodium intakes in Australia are similar to the rest of the world. Data from 66 countries[11], accounting for three-quarters of the world’s adult population, reported the average sodium consumption is 3.95 grams per day and ranges from 2.2 to 5.5 grams per day.

Yes, it’s possible to cut down on salt

Changing individual behaviour long term is challenging. But it’s possible.

A 2017 systematic review of dietary salt-reduction interventions[12] found individual dietary counselling could reduce a person’s salt consumption by about 2 grams a day (equivalent to 780mg of sodium), over time periods up to five years.

Population-wide strategies that include reformulating manufactured food with lower levels of salt, improved labelling and mass media education were even more effective in some regions[13], reducing average salt intakes by around 4 grams a day in Finland and Japan.

Japanese woman eats ramen from chopsticks.
Reformulating foods, better labelling and mass education can help reduce salt consumption. Shutterstock[14]

The authors of the latest paper highlight a lack of studies[15] in the population showing they’ve achieved dietary sodium intakes of less that 2.3 grams per day.

But this fails to acknowledge the challenges in conducting such a study to test that, or the importance of reducing your sodium intake relative to what you usually consume.

Cutting salt lowers your risk of heart disease

A recently published randomised trial across 600 villages in rural China[16] shows cutting salt intakes can reduce a person’s risk of cardiovascular disease, heart attack and stroke.

The study included more than 20,000 people with high blood pressure who either had a history of stroke or were aged over 60 years. One group was randomly assigned to use a salt substitute to reduce their sodium intake. The second group continued to use regular salt. Both groups were followed up over five years.

Read more: There is no great salt debate: we should be consuming less[17]

The intervention led to a reduction in sodium excreted in the urine (indicating complicance) and a reduction in blood pressure.

The rate of any major cardiovascular event, including heart attack, was 13% lower among those in the salt-substitute group compared to the regular salt group. The rate of strokes was 14% lower.

This trial demonstrates the benefit of reducing dietary sodium intakes, irrespective of a specific daily target.

Young man in a blue shirt puts salt into a salad bowl while cooking in a kitchen.
Australians consume two teaspoons of salt a day, when we should be limiting intake to one. Shutterstock[18]

Is it risky to have too little salt?

Humans need sodium to maintain essential bodily processes[19] such as fluid volume and cell stability. Sodium levels are balanced though a sensitive system of hormones, chemical processes and nerves to ensure that sodium in excess of needs is excreted in the urine.

There is conflicting evidence about heart health when you have very low sodium intakes. Some researchers have suggested there is a J-shaped[20] relationship, where both low and very high intakes increase the risk[21] of poor outcomes (the end of a “J” shape), while the lowest risk is across a broad mid-point of salt intake (the curve in the “J”).

Read more: Salt: how to cut back without losing that delicious flavour[22]

The J-shaped curve in some studies on salt and blood pressure[23] can be explained by issues such as measurement error, random variation, other differences (in age, sex, smoking status or socioeconomic status), existing dietary patterns or other health problems, interactions between a major sodium reduction, and the body’s physiological pathways that regulate blood pressure.

Or it could be explained by reverse causation, where the people recruited into the study report low sodium intakes because they have already been advised to follow a low salt diet before enrolling in the trial.

While we wait for more research to explaining discrepancies related to a J-shape curve, the evidence overwhelmingly finds[24] lower sodium intakes, compared to higher intakes, lead to important reductions in blood pressure.

Read more: Seven things to eat or avoid to lower your blood pressure[25]

Read more https://theconversation.com/is-salt-good-for-you-after-all-the-evidence-says-no-168743

The Times Features

The Budget-Friendly Traveler: How Off-Airport Car Hire Can Save You Money

When planning a trip, transportation is one of the most crucial considerations. For many, the go-to option is renting a car at the airport for convenience. But what if we told ...

Air is an overlooked source of nutrients – evidence shows we can inhale some vitamins

You know that feeling you get when you take a breath of fresh air in nature? There may be more to it than a simple lack of pollution. When we think of nutrients, we think of t...

FedEx Australia Announces Christmas Shipping Cut-Off Dates To Help Beat the Holiday Rush

With Christmas just around the corner, FedEx is advising Australian shoppers to get their presents sorted early to ensure they arrive on time for the big day. FedEx has reveale...

Will the Wage Price Index growth ease financial pressure for households?

The Wage Price Index’s quarterly increase of 0.8% has been met with mixed reactions. While Australian wages continue to increase, it was the smallest increase in two and a half...

Back-to-School Worries? 70% of Parents Fear Their Kids Aren’t Ready for Day On

Australian parents find themselves confronting a key decision: should they hold back their child on the age border for another year before starting school? Recent research from...

Democratising Property Investment: How MezFi is Opening Doors for Everyday Retail Investors

The launch of MezFi today [Friday 15th November] marks a watershed moment in Australian investment history – not just because we're introducing something entirely new, but becaus...

Times Magazine

How To Do Automated Web Testing?

Web testing is a must for modern online software. It is crucial to test your web applications throughout the developing process and especially before launch to ensure the best quality and user experience. However, automated testing is in most cas...

Business email compromise attacks are on the rise

Expert shares 5 simple steps to combat email threats every business should consider following There’s an astounding 84% increase in business email compromise attacks, according to the latest Email Threat Report, which compares half-yearly statis...

Why Is Cyber Security Awareness Training Important?

Among the many concerning online trends observed during COVID-19, the rapid rise of cyberattacks stands out. During the global crisis, Australia experienced a significant increase in pandemic-related phishing scams, as criminals exploited widespr...

Why Is a Website the Most Important Part of Digital Marketing?

Your website is the most important digital marketing tool you have, even more so than social media, content marketing, email marketing, traditional outbound advertising, and printed materials. All of your marketing activities will likely lead users...

A Quick Guide to Buying D Batteries in Bulk

If you have high-drain devices running on D batteries, it's important to have reserves at home. This is why you should consider buying bulk batteries. Not only will it help you save money, but it also prevents the need to take multiple trips to...

TWS Andes Earbuds with Active Noise Cancelling

TWS Andes Earbuds with ANC Boasting the most up-to-the-minute Dual Mic Active Noise Cancelling (ANC), the EFM TWS Andes Earbuds offer complete peace as well as peace of mind. The TWS Andes are sweat and dust-resistant IP54 rated and equi...