The Times Australia
The Times News

.

Talk of scrapping NZ's Human Rights Commission is a danger to democracy

  • Written by The Conversation
Talk of scrapping NZ's Human Rights Commission is a danger to democracy

A call to abolish[1] New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission and dismiss it as a “hard left” body forgets the role both sides of politics played in establishing the organisation. And the call comes at a time when, overseas, democracy and the right to speak out on issues are under threat.

ACT leader David Seymour[2] also accused the commission[3] of being “irrelevant” and “dangerous” in his call for the government organisation to be scrapped.

His attack came after the Human Rights Commission called for the newly-elected Labour government[4] to honour human rights[5] and it set out 39 issues[6] it wants politicians to adopt.

These include a right to a decent and affordable home, a living wage and an end to pay discrimination, more employment opportunities for disabled people and a national action plan against racism.

Politicians are asked to take account of the human rights promises made by successive governments. The commission also wants the growing partnership between the Crown and hapū and iwi[7] to be advanced.

Democracy under threat

Overseas, during the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a worsening of democracy and human rights in 80 countries, according to research[8] from the US-based Freedom House[9], an organisation devoted to the support and defence of democracy around the world.

The researchers say:

Governments have responded by engaging in abuses of power, silencing their critics, and weakening or shuttering important institutions, often undermining the very systems of accountability needed to protect public health.

The recent rapid decline is an acceleration of a longer trend of declining democracy and the freedoms that it protects. Sri Lanka and Cambodia have been identified[10] as states where democracy was already struggling and where there were weak safeguards against abuses of power.

The governments of Egypt, Guatemala and Zimbabwe, among others, were reported[11] as using the pandemic to engage in further abuses of power, to silence critics and to weaken or shut down institutions.

On a positive note, Aotearoa New Zealand featured favourably[12] in the Freedom House report, saying the government had announced a range of measures to make sure the election could go ahead during the pandemic.

Read more: Can New Zealand's most diverse ever cabinet improve representation of women and minorities in general?[13]

But Aotearoa New Zealand is not immune from efforts to undermine human rights and democracy. David Seymour has made calls before to abolish[14] the Human Rights Commission.

Following Seymour’s latest call, National’s Simon Bridges[15] said the commission needed reform. He described some of the issues it raised, such as “fair pay and raising benefits and all of these other things”, as legitimate — but they “ain’t human rights[16]”.

This type of thinking is reflected in the fact such rights are not protected by the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990[17]. The failure to include these rights makes it more difficult, but not impossible, for the commission (and the courts) to defend such rights.

But the right to adequate housing was enshrined in the United Nations’ Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948[18]. So too has the right to remuneration that ensures an existence worthy of human dignity, as has the right to social security.

The inclusion of such rights is largely due to the work of the first Labour government (1935–49), particularly then Prime Minister Peter Fraser. Aotearoa New Zealand accepted the UN declaration in December 1948.

A human rights framework

The origins of Aotearoa New Zealand’s own human rights framework begins in 1963 when the second National government (1960–72) tried, unsuccessfully, to pass a Bill of Rights Act. But it did pass the Race Relations Act[19] in 1971.

This act prohibited racial discrimination and established the office of Race Relations Conciliator. It was the first time New Zealand legislation made reference to the specific mandate of human rights protection.

The third National government (1975–84) established the Human Rights Commission. The Human Rights Commission Act 1977[20] prohibited a wide range of discrimination and the Human Rights Commission was tasked with investigating breaches of the Act.

The same government also accepted the rights to adequate housing, work that ensured a decent living and social security as legally binding[21] obligations in 1978[22].

The prohibition on discrimination was widened in 1993[23] under the fourth National government (1990–99).

In 2001, the fifth Labour government (1999–2008) extended[24] the powers of the Human Rights Commission. The commission’s focus changed from anti-discrimination to broader human rights issues.

Employment rights for people with disabilities were also part of a suite of disability rights[25] accepted by that government in 2008[26].

As for the call to advance the growing partnership between the Crown and hapū and iwi, the third Labour government (1972–75) oversaw the establishment of the Waitangi Tribunal[27] in 1975, and the National Party did not object.

The fifth National government (2008–2017) achieved the highest number of Treaty of Waitangi settlements of any administration to date.

Cross party support

Clearly then, New Zealand’s commitment to human rights, and providing redress for breaches of Te Tiriti for that matter, is not – and has never been – grounded in a “left wing manifesto[28]”, as David Seymour claims.

The strength of our democracy and commitment to human rights, including the right to free speech, means New Zealanders are free to agree or disagree with the Human Rights Commission’s call to action. We may also differ on what we understand actual human rights to be.

Read more: Her cabinet appointed, Jacinda Ardern now leads one of the most powerful governments NZ has seen[29]

It’s one thing to engage in the merits of the debate about whether decent and affordable housing, a living wage, fair pay and adequate benefits should be regarded as human rights.

But it’s another thing to call for the abolition of an institution set up to promote respect[30] for human rights and to ensure those rights are observed, as well as to make public statements[31] on any human rights matter.

New Zealanders should be wary of any calls to abolish the Human Rights Commission. To do so, would be one step to towards diminished accountability on the part of our leaders and the silencing of government critics. As Freedom House reports, these are some of the tactics favoured by repressive regimes seeking to undermine democracy and human rights.

References

  1. ^ call to abolish (www.newshub.co.nz)
  2. ^ David Seymour (www.act.org.nz)
  3. ^ accused the commission (www.nzherald.co.nz)
  4. ^ newly-elected Labour government (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ honour human rights (www.hrc.co.nz)
  6. ^ 39 issues (www.hrc.co.nz)
  7. ^ hapū and iwi (teara.govt.nz)
  8. ^ research (freedomhouse.org)
  9. ^ Freedom House (freedomhouse.org)
  10. ^ identified (freedomhouse.org)
  11. ^ reported (freedomhouse.org)
  12. ^ favourably (freedomhouse.org)
  13. ^ Can New Zealand's most diverse ever cabinet improve representation of women and minorities in general? (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ abolish (www.newshub.co.nz)
  15. ^ Simon Bridges (simonbridges.national.org.nz)
  16. ^ ain’t human rights (www.newshub.co.nz)
  17. ^ New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (www.legislation.govt.nz)
  18. ^ Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 (www.un.org)
  19. ^ Race Relations Act 1971 (www.nzlii.org)
  20. ^ Human Rights Commission Act 1977 (www.nzlii.org)
  21. ^ legally binding (www.ohchr.org)
  22. ^ 1978 (www.justice.govt.nz)
  23. ^ Human Rights Act 1993 (www.nzlii.org)
  24. ^ Human Rights Amendment Act 2001 (www.nzlii.org)
  25. ^ disability rights (www.un-documents.net)
  26. ^ 2008 (www.justice.govt.nz)
  27. ^ Waitangi Tribunal (www.nzlii.org)
  28. ^ left wing manifesto (www.newstalkzb.co.nz)
  29. ^ Her cabinet appointed, Jacinda Ardern now leads one of the most powerful governments NZ has seen (theconversation.com)
  30. ^ Human Rights Commission Act 1977 (www.nzlii.org)
  31. ^ Human Rights Commission Act 1977 (www.nzlii.org)

Read more https://theconversation.com/talk-of-scrapping-nzs-human-rights-commission-is-a-danger-to-democracy-149160

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...

The Role of Your GP in Creating a Chronic Disease Management Plan That Works

Living with a long-term condition, whether that is diabetes, asthma, arthritis or heart disease, means making hundreds of small decisions every day. You plan your diet against m...

Troubleshooting Flickering Lights: A Comprehensive Guide for Homeowners

Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik Effectively addressing flickering lights in your home is more than just a matter of convenience; it's a pivotal aspect of both home safety and en...