The Times Australia
The Times Australia
.

Australia has led the way regulating gene technology for over 20 years. Here’s how it should apply that to AI

  • Written by Julia Powles, Associate Professor of Law and Technology; Director, UWA Tech & Policy Lab, Law School, The University of Western Australia
Chart depicting how and by whom the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator is informed.

Since 2019, the Australian Department for Industry, Science and Resources has been striving to make the nation a leader in “safe and responsible” artificial intelligence[1] (AI). Key to this is a voluntary framework based on eight AI ethics principles[2], including “human-centred values”, “fairness” and “transparency and explainability”.

Every subsequent piece of national guidance on AI has spun off these eight principles, imploring business[3], government[4] and schools[5] to put them into practice. But these voluntary principles have no real hold on organisations that develop and deploy AI systems.

Last month, the Australian government started consulting on a proposal[6] that struck a different tone. Acknowledging “voluntary compliance […] is no longer enough”, it spoke of “mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings[7]”.

But the core idea of self-regulation remains stubbornly baked in. For example, it’s up to AI developers to determine whether their AI system is high risk, by having regard to a set of risks that can only be described as endemic to large-scale AI systems[8].

If this high hurdle is met, what mandatory guardrails kick in? For the most part, companies simply need to demonstrate they have internal processes gesturing at the AI ethics principles. The proposal is most notable, then, for what it does not include. There is no oversight, no consequences, no refusal, no redress.

But there is a different, ready-to-hand model that Australia could adopt for AI. It comes from another critical technology in the national interest[9]: gene technology.

A different model

Gene technology is what’s behind genetically modified organisms. Like AI[10], it raises concerns[11] for more than 60%[12] of the population.

In Australia, it’s regulated by the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator[13]. The regulator was established in 2001 to meet the biotech boom in agriculture and health. Since then, it’s become the exemplar of an expert-informed, highly transparent[14] regulator focused on a specific technology with far-reaching consequences.

Three features have ensured the gene technology regulator’s national and international success[15].

First, it’s a single-mission body. It regulates[16] dealings with genetically modified organisms:

to protect the health and safety of people, and to protect the environment, by identifying risks posed by or as a result of gene technology.

Second, it has a sophisticated decision-making structure[17]. Thanks to it, the risk assessment of every application of gene technology in Australia is informed by sound expertise. It also insulates that assessment from political influence and corporate lobbying.

The regulator is informed by two integrated expert bodies: a Technical Advisory Committee[18] and an Ethics and Community Consultative Committee[19]. These bodies are complemented by Institutional Biosafety Committees[20] supporting ongoing risk management at more than 200 research and commercial institutions accredited[21] to use gene technology in Australia. This parallels[22] best practice in food safety[23] and drug safety[24].

Chart depicting how and by whom the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator is informed.
The Gene Technology Regulator has a sophisticated decision-making structure. Office of The Gene Technology Regulator, CC BY[25][26]

Third, the regulator continuously[27] integrates public input[28] into its risk assessment process. It does so meaningfully and transparently. Every dealing with gene technology must be approved[29]. Before a release into the wild, an exhaustive consultation process maximises review and oversight. This ensures a high threshold of public safety.

Regulating high-risk technologies

Together, these factors explain why Australia’s gene technology regulator has been so successful. They also highlight what’s missing in most emerging approaches to AI regulation.

The mandate of AI regulation typically involves an impossible compromise between protecting the public and supporting industry. As with gene regulation, it seeks to safeguard against risks. In the case of AI, those risks would be to health, the environment and human rights. But it also seeks to “maximise the opportunities that AI presents for our economy and society[30]”.

Second, currently proposed AI regulation outsources risk assessment and management to commercial AI providers. Instead, it should develop a national evidence base, informed by cross-disciplinary scientific, socio-technical[31] and civil society[32] expertise.

The argument goes that AI is “out of the bag”, with potential applications too numerous and too mundane to regulate. Yet molecular biology methods are also well out of the bag. The gene tech regulator still maintains oversight of all uses of the technology, while continually working to categorise certain dealings as “exempt” or “low-risk” to facilitate research and development.

Third, the public has no meaningful opportunity to assent[33] to dealings with AI. This is true regardless of whether it involves plundering the archives of our collective imaginations[34] to build AI systems[35], or deploying them in ways that undercut dignity, autonomy and justice.

The lesson of more than two decades of gene regulation is that it doesn’t stop innovation to regulate a promising new technology until it can demonstrate a history of non-damaging use to people and the environment. In fact, it saves it.

References

  1. ^ safe and responsible” artificial intelligence (www.industry.gov.au)
  2. ^ eight AI ethics principles (www.industry.gov.au)
  3. ^ business (www.industry.gov.au)
  4. ^ government (www.finance.gov.au)
  5. ^ schools (www.education.gov.au)
  6. ^ proposal (consult.industry.gov.au)
  7. ^ mandatory guardrails for AI in high-risk settings (consult.industry.gov.au)
  8. ^ endemic to large-scale AI systems (dl.acm.org)
  9. ^ critical technology in the national interest (www.industry.gov.au)
  10. ^ Like AI (ai.uq.edu.au)
  11. ^ concerns (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ more than 60% (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  13. ^ Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  14. ^ highly transparent (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  15. ^ national and international success (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  16. ^ regulates (www.legislation.gov.au)
  17. ^ decision-making structure (www.genetechnology.gov.au)
  18. ^ Technical Advisory Committee (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  19. ^ Ethics and Community Consultative Committee (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  20. ^ Institutional Biosafety Committees (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  21. ^ accredited (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  22. ^ parallels (theconversation.com)
  23. ^ food safety (www.foodstandards.gov.au)
  24. ^ drug safety (www.tga.gov.au)
  25. ^ Office of The Gene Technology Regulator (www.genetechnology.gov.au)
  26. ^ CC BY (creativecommons.org)
  27. ^ continuously (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  28. ^ public input (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  29. ^ must be approved (www.ogtr.gov.au)
  30. ^ maximise the opportunities that AI presents for our economy and society (www.industry.gov.au)
  31. ^ socio-technical (datasociety.net)
  32. ^ civil society (www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk)
  33. ^ opportunity to assent (onezero.medium.com)
  34. ^ plundering the archives of our collective imaginations (iapp.org)
  35. ^ build AI systems (papers.ssrn.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/australia-has-led-the-way-regulating-gene-technology-for-over-20-years-heres-how-it-should-apply-that-to-ai-240571

Sydney once produced its own food – but urban development has devoured the city’s food bowl

For much of Sydney’s history, the city supported its population with crops, orchards, dairies, abattoirs, oy...

Times Magazine

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beauty On Saturday, September 6th, history will be made as the International Polo Tour (IPT), a sports leader headquartered here in South Florida...

5 Ways Microsoft Fabric Simplifies Your Data Analytics Workflow

In today's data-driven world, businesses are constantly seeking ways to streamline their data analytics processes. The sheer volume and complexity of data can be overwhelming, often leading to bottlenecks and inefficiencies. Enter the innovative da...

7 Questions to Ask Before You Sign IT Support Companies in Sydney

Choosing an IT partner can feel like buying an insurance policy you hope you never need. The right choice keeps your team productive, your data safe, and your budget predictable. The wrong choice shows up as slow tickets, surprise bills, and risky sh...

Choosing the Right Legal Aid Lawyer in Sutherland Shire: Key Considerations

Legal aid services play an essential role in ensuring access to justice for all. For people in the Sutherland Shire who may not have the financial means to pay for private legal assistance, legal aid ensures that everyone has access to representa...

Watercolor vs. Oil vs. Digital: Which Medium Fits Your Pet's Personality?

When it comes to immortalizing your pet’s unique personality in art, choosing the right medium is essential. Each artistic medium, whether watercolor, oil, or digital, has distinct qualities that can bring out the spirit of your furry friend in dif...

DIY Is In: How Aussie Parents Are Redefining Birthday Parties

When planning his daughter’s birthday, Rich opted for a DIY approach, inspired by her love for drawing maps and giving clues. Their weekend tradition of hiding treats at home sparked the idea, and with a pirate ship playground already chosen as t...

The Times Features

Do you really need a dental check-up and clean every 6 months?

Just over half of Australian adults[1] saw a dental practitioner in the past 12 months, most commonly for a check-up[2]. But have you been told you should get a check-up and c...

What is a Compounding Pharmacy and Why Do You Need One in Melbourne?

Ever picked up a prescription and thought, this pill is too big, too bitter, or full of things I cannot have? That is where a compounding chemist becomes important. A compounding p...

Deep Cleaning vs Regular Cleaning: Which One Do Perth Homes Really Need?

Whether you live in a coastal home in Cottesloe or a modern apartment in East Perth, keeping your living space clean isn’t just about aesthetics, it’s essential for your health and...

Rubber vs Concrete Wheel Stops: Which is Better for Your Car Park?

When it comes to setting up a car park in Perth, wheel stops are a small feature that make a big difference. From improving driver accuracy to preventing costly damage, the right c...

Not all processed foods are bad for you. Here’s what you can tell from reading the label

If you follow wellness content on social media or in the news, you’ve probably heard that processed food is not just unhealthy, but can cause serious harm. Eating a diet domin...

What happens if I eat too much protein?

The hype around protein[1] intake doesn’t seem to be going away. Social media is full of people urging you to eat more protein, including via supplements such as protein sha...