The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

The gas tax's tortured history shows how hard it is to fund new infrastructure

  • Written by Theodore J. Kury, Director of Energy Studies, University of Florida
The gas tax's tortured history shows how hard it is to fund new infrastructure

As the Biden administration and Republicans negotiate a possible infrastructure spending package[1], how to pay for it has been a key sticking point.

President Joe Biden and Democrats in Congress want to raise taxes on the rich[2], while some Republicans have been pushing for an increase in the gas tax[3] – which would be the first in 28 years. A bipartisan group of senators recently crafted a compromise bill that would pay for just under US$1 trillion in spending on rail, roads and bridges[4] over five years in part by indexing the gas tax to inflation. Democrats call this regressive[5] because it would raise taxes on working Americans.

As the director of energy studies at the University of Florida’s Public Utility Research Center, I’ve studied both taxes on energy[6] and how the government[7] spends money on infrastructure[8].

Throughout the gas tax’s controversial history, leaders have frequently called upon this revenue source when serious infrastructure investment is needed.

The first 40 years

This resilient levy is a major source of U.S. funding for roads and transit today. It originated during the Great Depression[9] as a “temporary” penny-per-gallon gasoline tax. At the time, a gallon cost about 18 cents[10], or about $2.90 in 2021 dollars[11].

As he signed the Revenue Act of 1932[12] into law, President Herbert Hoover[13] lauded “the willingness of our people to accept this added burden in these times in order impregnably to establish the credit of the federal government.”

The original gas tax, an emergency measure intended to bolster the budget and fund national defense spending[14], not to meet transportation needs, was slated to expire in 1933. Instead, persistent budget deficits throughout the New Deal and World War II[15] kept it in force throughout Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration[16] over the objections of the oil, automotive and travel industries. It became a permanent 1.5-cent levy in 1941[17].

Multiple efforts to do away with the gas tax ever since have failed.

For example, Congress again scheduled the tax’s repeal in 1951[18] when it increased it to 2 cents as a source of revenue related to the Korean War. Instead, lawmakers agreed to keep the tax on the books to help pay for one of President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s top priorities, the national interstate highway system[19].

In 1956[20] the levy rose once more, to 3 cents, when Americans were paying about 30 cents for a gallon of gas[21]. At the same time, the government established the Highway Trust Fund[22] to use the gas tax revenue to pay for building and maintaining the new interstates.

The tax rose to 4 cents per gallon in 1959[23] and froze at that level for more than two decades.

Running on empty

Gas tax revenue stopped keeping up with the expenses it was supposed to cover in the early 1970s following a severe bout of inflation[24] and OPEC’s oil embargo[25]. U.S. gas prices soared from about 36 cents per gallon in 1972 to $1.31 in 1981.

Responding to what members of both major political parties saw as a transportation infrastructure crisis[26], Congress more than doubled the tax to 9 cents per gallon as part of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982[27]. The same law split the Highway Trust Fund and its revenue stream into two parts: The first 8 cents would finance roadwork while the other penny would finance mass transit projects.

This hike may have struck drivers as a sharp increase, but public spending on transportation infrastructure would continue to fall as a percentage of all outlays[28].

In 1984, Congress increased spending on highways by funneling proceeds from fines and other penalties that businesses pay for safety violations[29], such as failing to label hazardous materials or forcing drivers to work too many hours in a row.

Congress boosted the tax twice more in the 1990s but primarily to reduce the then-ballooning federal deficit[30]. Only half of a 5-cent increase in 1990 went to highways and transit, while a 4.3-cent lift three years later went entirely to lowering the deficit.

By 1997, the government had redirected all gas tax revenue reserved for deficit reduction[31] to the Highway Trust Fund[32], where it still flows today.

Along the way, other federal fuel taxes[33] arose, including a 24.4-cent-per-gallon diesel tax and taxes on methanol and compressed natural gas. And state fuel taxes[34], which in most cases began before the federal gas tax[35], range from as low as 8.95 cents per gallon in Alaska to as high as 57.6 cents per gallon in Pennsylvania.

[Understand key political developments, each week. Subscribe to The Conversation’s politics newsletter[36].]

Making do

Since 1993, when the federal gas tax was first parked at 18.4 cents, inflation and rising construction costs[37] have eroded its effectiveness as a transportation-related revenue source. In addition, U.S. vehicles have grown more fuel-efficient[38] overall – which means Americans use less fuel[39] for every mile they drive.

As a result, highway and transit spending has significantly outpaced the revenue collected from the gas tax and other sources. Since 2008, the government has transferred over $80 billion[40] to the fund that it had to take from other sources.

But it’s still not enough. The American Society of Civil Engineers[41], which gives U.S. infrastructure a C-minus, is calling on the government and private sector to increase spending on roads and bridges by at least $2.5 trillion within a decade.

While it’s true the gas tax may be regressive[42] because lower-income people pay the same rate as those who earn higher incomes, there are still advantages to this tax.

For one thing, it follows the “user pays” principle[43] of providing government services. Under this principle, the people using the roads are held responsible for paying for their upkeep. As the number of motorists using electric vehicles increases, however, this may become less true over time.

Further, it would also create an incentive to at least marginally decrease the use of fossil fuels[44], accomplishing another goal of the administration.

Finally, the government could always subsidize the tax for the poor, perhaps through annual lump-sum payments, making it less regressive.

Clearly, U.S. infrastructure is in dire need of upgrading and investment. At the end of the day, Americans will pay for it one way or another – whether in taxes or through costs of unsafe and inadequate infrastructure, including in lost lives[45]. How the government pays for investment may matter less than that it finally does it.

This is an updated version of an article first published on Feb. 27, 2018[46].

References

  1. ^ negotiate a possible infrastructure spending package (thehill.com)
  2. ^ want to raise taxes on the rich (www.nytimes.com)
  3. ^ Republicans have been pushing for an increase in the gas tax (www.businessinsider.com)
  4. ^ would pay for just under US$1 trillion in spending on rail, roads and bridges (www.wsj.com)
  5. ^ Democrats call this regressive (www.businessinsider.com)
  6. ^ taxes on energy (warrington.ufl.edu)
  7. ^ how the government (go.pardot.com)
  8. ^ spends money on infrastructure (warrington.ufl.edu)
  9. ^ originated during the Great Depression (fraser.stlouisfed.org)
  10. ^ cost about 18 cents (energy.gov)
  11. ^ about $2.90 in 2021 dollars (fred.stlouisfed.org)
  12. ^ Revenue Act of 1932 (fraser.stlouisfed.org)
  13. ^ President Herbert Hoover (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  14. ^ bolster the budget and fund national defense spending (itep.org)
  15. ^ persistent budget deficits throughout the New Deal and World War II (fas.org)
  16. ^ in force throughout Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  17. ^ permanent 1.5-cent levy in 1941 (www.thoughtco.com)
  18. ^ Congress again scheduled the tax’s repeal in 1951 (www.govtrack.us)
  19. ^ national interstate highway system (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  20. ^ In 1956 (www.history.com)
  21. ^ 30 cents for a gallon of gas (energy.gov)
  22. ^ Highway Trust Fund (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  23. ^ 4 cents per gallon in 1959 (www.finance.senate.gov)
  24. ^ bout of inflation (www.investopedia.com)
  25. ^ oil embargo (www.thebalance.com)
  26. ^ transportation infrastructure crisis (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  27. ^ Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (www.govtrack.us)
  28. ^ fall as a percentage of all outlays (www.cbo.gov)
  29. ^ businesses pay for safety violations (www.ccjdigital.com)
  30. ^ reduce the then-ballooning federal deficit (www.congress.gov)
  31. ^ redirected all gas tax revenue reserved for deficit reduction (fas.org)
  32. ^ Highway Trust Fund (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  33. ^ other federal fuel taxes (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  34. ^ state fuel taxes (www.taxadmin.org)
  35. ^ began before the federal gas tax (fas.org)
  36. ^ Subscribe to The Conversation’s politics newsletter (theconversation.com)
  37. ^ rising construction costs (edzarenski.com)
  38. ^ vehicles have grown more fuel-efficient (www.wired.com)
  39. ^ use less fuel (www.eia.gov)
  40. ^ $80 billion (www.fhwa.dot.gov)
  41. ^ American Society of Civil Engineers (www.asce.org)
  42. ^ may be regressive (www.thebalance.com)
  43. ^ “user pays” principle (ppiaf.org)
  44. ^ at least marginally decrease the use of fossil fuels (www.nber.org)
  45. ^ lost lives (www.nytimes.com)
  46. ^ Feb. 27, 2018 (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/the-gas-taxs-tortured-history-shows-how-hard-it-is-to-fund-new-infrastructure-163152

Times Magazine

The Importance of a Good Divorce Lawyer: Insights from Leading Practitioners in Sydney

Due to its complexity, divorce is considered the most stressful and daunting event of one’s life. It has an emotional toll, with the labyrinth of legal processes causing a feeling of loss and overwhelm. In Australia, the divorce rate has been ri...

The Evolution Of TV Over The Years

If you have been around for long enough, you might have seen the tech evolution affecting life. This has significantly influenced the way we get entertained and stay busy. Gone are the days when kids would spend hours playing games in the backyar...

Here are some great ways that you can support creative and curious children

A child’s learning doesn’t stop when they leave their classroom or daycare room. Children’s minds will develop faster in their first five years, than at any other time in their lives. It’s important for us as Educators, as well as parents to alwa...

Choosing the Right WordPress Hosting Provider in Australia

Introduction Australia’s thriving technological market has led to an increase in demand for trusted web hosting providers more than ever before, specifically for organizations and users who are utilizing WordPress to increase their online visibili...

Powering the Future: Innovations in Gas and Electricity

Powering the Future: Innovations in Compare Gas and Electricity" is a book that provides an in-depth exploration of the latest advancements and technologies in the energy sector. The book delves into the history of gas and electricity, while showca...

Why Is Cyber Security Awareness Training Important?

Among the many concerning online trends observed during COVID-19, the rapid rise of cyberattacks stands out. During the global crisis, Australia experienced a significant increase in pandemic-related phishing scams, as criminals exploited widespr...