The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

Alcohol companies make $17.5 billion a year off of underage drinking, while prevention efforts are starved for cash

  • Written by David H. Jernigan, Professor of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University
Alcohol companies make $17.5 billion a year off of underage drinking, while prevention efforts are starved for cash CC–BY–ND.

Alcohol is still the most commonly used[1] drug among high school students. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, every year approximately 3,500 people under 21 die because of alcohol use[2].

I have studied the relationship between alcohol marketing and youth drinking behavior for the past 20 years. In 2011, my colleagues and I performed what to our knowledge was the first and only survey of what specific brands of alcohol underage people drink[3]. We asked 1,032 young drinkers about 898 brands of alcohol to learn what the underage alcohol market looks like.

In a new paper published on June 9, 2021, my colleagues and I combined our survey data with the latest information available about alcohol consumption among adults to estimate the percent of all alcohol sold in the U.S. that was consumed by young people[4]. Then, we were able to calculate how much money underage drinkers are spending and, importantly, which companies are making this money[5].

Two empty red plastic cups next to tipped over beer bottles. Just three companies account for nearly half of all alcohol consumed by minors. MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images[6]

Who makes money from underage drinking?

In 2016, the most recent year for which market research and government data were available, the total value of alcoholic beverage sales in the U.S. was around US$237.1 billion[7]. Using our model of the youth market from 2011 and our database of alcohol prices, we were able to estimate the retail sales of youth consumption for 2011 and project it to 2016. In total, we estimate that youth under 21 accounted for 8.6% of the drinks consumed and 7.4% of the dollars spent[8], since young people buy cheaper alcohol. This translates to $17.5 billion. While underage drinking has been steadily declining since 2002[9], it is still a substantial source of income for these companies.

According to our 2011 survey[10], the 10 most popular alcohol brands among underage drinkers were Bud Light, Budweiser, Smirnoff Malt Beverages, Smirnoff Vodkas, Coors Light, Jack Daniel’s Bourbons, Corona Extra, Mike’s, Captain Morgan Rums and Absolut Vodkas.

Three companies own most of these drinks and accounted for nearly half – 44.7% – of the alcoholic drinks consumed by young people. Anheuser-Busch InBev accounted for 21.2% of of these drinks, from which they earned $2.2 billion. MillerCoors sold 11.1% of the booze, earning $1.1 billion. Spirits- and beer-maker Diageo also sold 11.1% of the beverages youth drank – and, since liquor tends to be more expensive per drink compared to beer, earned $2 billion from underage drinking.

Revenues from underage drinking could be put to good use

A sign  on a fence saying 'Must be 21 years old to enter.' Alcohol companies claim to be against underage drinking but contribute very little money to effective programs aimed at reducing the large market. Kameleon007/iStock via Getty Images Plus[11]

Brewing industry trade association the Beer Institute says that the “U.S. beer industry has dedicated itself to preventing illegal underage drinking for more than three decades[12].” They go on to say that companies do their part to make sure advertising is aimed at adults, educate parents and college students about underage drinking and encourage stores to not sell alcohol to minors.

However, numerous studies[13] have found that alcohol companies’ actions to prevent alcohol-related harms are ineffective. Our research clearly demonstrates a conflict of interest: These companies are making literally billions of dollars from the very behavior they say they want to prevent.

In response to a request from Congress, in 2003, the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine issued a major report on reducing underage drinking[14]. They recommended that all segments of the alcohol industry that profit from underage drinking place 0.5% of total company revenues in an independent nonprofit foundation dedicated to reducing and preventing underage drinking. In 2016, this would have amounted, for example, to $78 million from Anheuser-Busch InBev. This money could do a lot to support community groups trying to implement evidence-based strategies[15] such as reducing density of stores that sell alcohol, raising alcohol taxes and increasing enforcement around illegal sales to minors.

But no independent fund was ever created, and the alcohol companies themselves continue to control the money they contribute to preventing underage drinking, largely spending it on branded “corporate social responsibility” efforts that do more to promote their products than prevent harmful drinking[16].

Meanwhile, federal funding specifically dedicated to the prevention of underage drinking is minimal. The most recent president’s budget[17] recommended a mere $10 million for grants to community coalitions working on underage drinking. On top of this, as a result of a significant alcohol tax cut passed in 2017 and made permanent in 2020[18], alcohol companies are contributing less to the federal budget than ever.

I believe that, because of their conflict of interest, alcohol companies cannot be trusted to spend prevention dollars effectively. The billions these companies make from underage drinking is money that the prevention field could really use. A system, independent of the industry, that would collect and allocate these unwanted revenues could be a better way to get it to local communities and help reduce and prevent underage drinking.

[Get our best science, health and technology stories. Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter[19].]

References

  1. ^ most commonly used (www.cdc.gov)
  2. ^ 3,500 people under 21 die because of alcohol use (nccd.cdc.gov)
  3. ^ what specific brands of alcohol underage people drink (doi.org)
  4. ^ that was consumed by young people (doi.org)
  5. ^ which companies are making this money (doi.org)
  6. ^ MediaNews Group/Reading Eagle via Getty Images (www.gettyimages.com)
  7. ^ was around US$237.1 billion (doi.org)
  8. ^ 8.6% of the drinks consumed and 7.4% of the dollars spent (doi.org)
  9. ^ steadily declining since 2002 (www.niaaa.nih.gov)
  10. ^ 2011 survey (doi.org)
  11. ^ Kameleon007/iStock via Getty Images Plus (www.gettyimages.com)
  12. ^ U.S. beer industry has dedicated itself to preventing illegal underage drinking for more than three decades (www.beerinstitute.org)
  13. ^ numerous studies (dx.doi.org)
  14. ^ major report on reducing underage drinking (doi.org)
  15. ^ evidence-based strategies (www.thecommunityguide.org)
  16. ^ promote their products than prevent harmful drinking (dx.doi.org)
  17. ^ most recent president’s budget (www.samhsa.gov)
  18. ^ made permanent in 2020 (www.thedrinksbusiness.com)
  19. ^ Sign up for The Conversation’s science newsletter (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/alcohol-companies-make-17-5-billion-a-year-off-of-underage-drinking-while-prevention-efforts-are-starved-for-cash-162222

Times Magazine

With Nvidia’s second-best AI chips headed for China, the US shifts priorities from security to trade

This week, US President Donald Trump approved previously banned exports[1] of Nvidia’s powerful ...

Navman MiVue™ True 4K PRO Surround honest review

If you drive a car, you should have a dashcam. Need convincing? All I ask that you do is search fo...

Australia’s supercomputers are falling behind – and it’s hurting our ability to adapt to climate change

As Earth continues to warm, Australia faces some important decisions. For example, where shou...

Australia’s electric vehicle surge — EVs and hybrids hit record levels

Australians are increasingly embracing electric and hybrid cars, with 2025 shaping up as the str...

Tim Ayres on the AI rollout’s looming ‘bumps and glitches’

The federal government released its National AI Strategy[1] this week, confirming it has dropped...

Seven in Ten Australian Workers Say Employers Are Failing to Prepare Them for AI Future

As artificial intelligence (AI) accelerates across industries, a growing number of Australian work...

The Times Features

I’m heading overseas. Do I really need travel vaccines?

Australia is in its busiest month[1] for short-term overseas travel. And there are so many thi...

Mint Payments partners with Zip Co to add flexible payment options for travel merchants

Mint Payments, Australia's leading travel payments specialist, today announced a partnership with ...

When Holiday Small Talk Hurts Inclusion at Work

Dr. Tatiana Andreeva, Associate Professor in Management and Organisational Behaviour, Maynooth U...

Human Rights Day: The Right to Shelter Isn’t Optional

It is World Human Rights Day this week. Across Australia, politicians read declarations and clai...

In awkward timing, government ends energy rebate as it defends Wells’ spendathon

There are two glaring lessons for politicians from the Anika Wells’ entitlements affair. First...

Australia’s Coffee Culture Faces an Afternoon Rethink as New Research Reveals a Surprising Blind Spot

Australia’s celebrated coffee culture may be world‑class in the morning, but new research* sugge...

Reflections invests almost $1 million in Tumut River park to boost regional tourism

Reflections Holidays, the largest adventure holiday park group in New South Wales, has launched ...

Groundbreaking Trial: Fish Oil Slashes Heart Complications in Dialysis Patients

A significant development for patients undergoing dialysis for kidney failure—a group with an except...

Worried after sunscreen recalls? Here’s how to choose a safe one

Most of us know sunscreen is a key way[1] to protect areas of our skin not easily covered by c...