The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
Times Media

.

The US presidential election is too close to call. Don’t blame the polls

  • Written by Samuel Garrett, Research Associate, United States Studies Centre, University of Sydney



With just hours remaining until election day in the United States, pundits and the public alike are scouring public opinion polls for early signs of a result.

We’ve had months of campaigning and hundreds[1] of polls. Yet, there are still few conclusive takeaways other than the dissatisfying catchphrase of election analysts the world over this year: “it’s too close to call”.

So, why is this happening? And what are we to make of the polls?

Polling isn’t predictive

Both campaigns have at different times touted favourable – and conflicting – polling numbers. The trouble is no one seems to know which polls to believe.

On Sunday, a new Des Moines Register poll[2] headed by respected pollster[3] Ann Selzer showed Kamala Harris with a surprise three-point lead over Donald Trump in Iowa, providing an unexpected boost to Harris’ anxious campaign.

Within hours, a “confidential” Trump campaign memo dismissed[4] Selzer’s numbers. Trump himself tweeted[5] favourable polling from AtlasIntel that shows him leading in all seven swing states.

In recent cycles, despite misses in some key states – particularly in Wisconsin in 2016[6] and 2020[7] – averages of polling have tended to be relatively accurate[8] estimations of public opinion.

However, there is little that can be gleaned from current swing state margins that are all within the margin of error, other than what we already know: Americans are deeply divided over their choices.

Part of the reason why is that polls are not predictive. They are a measure of popular sentiment at the time of the poll, from which educated guesses can be made about who may win a future election.

But margins of error (which are significantly higher[9] than generally understood), combined with regularly razor-thin final vote tallies in key states and the winner-takes-all nature of the electoral college, limits their ability to predict electoral winners.

The size and direction of polling errors are unpredictable[10], particularly because they are often not uniform across the country, and historically don’t favour one party more than another.

Small misses have outsized impacts

Methodologically, accurate election polling is made more difficult in the United States because of high non-response rates and non-compulsory voting (which requires weighting responses based on predicted likely voters).

Errors in these assumptions were key to polling errors in 2016 and 2020.

Polls in 2016 famously underestimated Trump’s support by failing[11] to control for education in their samples.

This meant they missed his support among white, non-college educated voters[12] who helped propel him to victory in the Midwest.

But while 2016 is remembered as a catastrophic failure of opinion polling for apparently failing to predict a Trump victory, polling averages heading into election day were, in fact, broadly accurate.

National polls were among the most accurate[13] in 80 years, overstating Clinton’s popular vote margin only by about one percentage point.

Across the ten closest states in the 2016 election, Trump was underestimated on average by just 1.4%.

Misses in a handful of key states such as Wisconsin[14], while significant, had an outsized impact on the final result.

The margins were such that a difference of just a few points of polling error were enough to flip so-called blue wall states and deliver what most analysts had considered to be an unthinkable victory for Trump.

Nevertheless, it was the polls – rather than analytical mistakes and poor media reporting – which copped the blame for failing to convey that the unthinkable was in fact quite probable, despite the margins of error making clear that there was a strong statistical likelihood of a different result.

Polls were much wider off the mark in 2020 but avoided the same level of public scrutiny given they correctly (if narrowly) “predicted” a Biden victory.

US presidential candiates Democrat Hillary Clinton (R) and Republican Donald Trump (L) during the second presidential debate at Washington University
Errors in important assumptions were key to polling errors in 2016 and 2020. EPA/JIM LO SCALZO[15]

Have pollsters fixed past flaws?

Based on polling averages[16] in 2024, a uniform error in Trump’s favour of less than 0.8% across the seven key swing states could deliver him a comfortable 312–226 electoral college victory.

Equally, a uniform shift of less than three percentage points in Harris’ favour could deliver an equally lopsided 319–219 win for the Democrats.

The critical question is whether pollsters have done enough to amend the flawed methodologies that underestimated Trump’s support in 2016 and 2020.

Changes in some polls include[17] an increase in hybrid sampling methods (mixing both phone calls and online interviews) and weighting on past votes.

But such methods could be overcompensating[18] for past mistakes and now underestimating[19] Harris’ support by failing to sample them properly.

Until the votes are counted and the winner declared, there is no sure way of knowing.

Polls can’t do everything

Polling remains remarkably accurate, given that it is an attempt to divine the views of hundreds of millions of people. But it is a mistake to believe polling is predictive or determinative.

The vagaries of polling – and, most of all, the vagaries of the US electoral system – mean there is little point attempting to read the tea leaves beyond the broad public sentiment that polling captures.

On these numbers, the result could indeed come down to a handful of votes, or instead see a lopsided electoral college victory.

Either way, don’t blame the polls.

References

  1. ^ hundreds (abcnews.go.com)
  2. ^ poll (www.abc.net.au)
  3. ^ respected pollster (fivethirtyeight.com)
  4. ^ dismissed (cdn.nucleusfiles.com)
  5. ^ tweeted (x.com)
  6. ^ 2016 (www.realclearpolling.com)
  7. ^ 2020 (www.realclearpolling.com)
  8. ^ relatively accurate (www.nytimes.com)
  9. ^ significantly higher (www.nytimes.com)
  10. ^ unpredictable (www.nytimes.com)
  11. ^ failing (aapor.org)
  12. ^ white, non-college educated voters (aapor.org)
  13. ^ among the most accurate (aapor.org)
  14. ^ Wisconsin (www.realclearpolling.com)
  15. ^ EPA/JIM LO SCALZO (photos.aap.com.au)
  16. ^ averages (www.realclearpolling.com)
  17. ^ include (thehill.com)
  18. ^ overcompensating (www.politico.com)
  19. ^ underestimating (www.politico.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/the-us-presidential-election-is-too-close-to-call-dont-blame-the-polls-242763

The Times Features

Group Adventures Made Easy: How to Coordinate Shuttle Services from DCA to IAD

Traveling as a large group can be both exciting and challenging, especially when navigating busy airports like DCA (Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport) and IAD (Washington...

From Anxiety to Assurance: Proven Strategies to Support Your Child's Emotional Health

Navigating the intricate landscape of childhood emotions can be a daunting task for any parent, especially when faced with common fears and anxieties. However, transforming anxie...

The Rise of Meal Replacement Shakes in Australia: Why The Lady Shake Is Leading the Pack

Source Meal replacement shakes are having a moment in Australia, and it’s not hard to see why. They’re quick, convenient, and packed with nutrition, making them the perfect solu...

HCF’s Healthy Hearts Roadshow Wraps Up 2024 with a Final Regional Sprint

Next week marks the final leg of the HCF Healthy Hearts Roadshow for 2024, bringing free heart health checks to some of NSW’s most vibrant regional communities. As Australia’s ...

The Budget-Friendly Traveler: How Off-Airport Car Hire Can Save You Money

When planning a trip, transportation is one of the most crucial considerations. For many, the go-to option is renting a car at the airport for convenience. But what if we told ...

Air is an overlooked source of nutrients – evidence shows we can inhale some vitamins

You know that feeling you get when you take a breath of fresh air in nature? There may be more to it than a simple lack of pollution. When we think of nutrients, we think of t...

Times Magazine

Some Tips For Buying The Right Pair Of Sneakers

The old saying goes "Never judge a book by its cover". This august wisdom applies to a lot more things in life than just books, including today's topic, sneakers. It's easy to be charmed by clever designs, bright colours, and blingy glitz, but it's...

Mastering the art of food photography by Kirsty Owen, WOW Pictures

Food photography is the ultimate in visual storytelling.  From the crispy, delicate croissant to be indulged at daybreak,  the glistening cocktail set against the sunset, to the appetising cheese on offer at a regional food festival, food photograp...

Segway ZT3 Pro All-Terrain Electric Scooter

Segway-Ninebot, the global leader in the micromobility transportation solutions and robotic service industries is announcing its brand-new ZT series of electric scooters with the ZT3 Pro in Australia. The Segway ZT3 Pro combines cutting-edge smar...

9 tips to stay safe online

Navigating the internet is more challenging now than it was 20 years ago. It’s become a ubiquitous part of life, connecting us, speeding us up and entertaining us. But with the good comes the bad, and the scammers and thieves are getting cleverer...

From Comfort to Control: Tips for Selecting the Best Dog Harness for Your Pet

Are you tired of your dog pulling on walks or slipping out of their collar? It might be time to switch from comfort to control with a high-quality dog harness. In this blog post, we'll discuss everything you need to know about selecting the best ha...

6 Life-Improving Apps Available Right Now

Smartphone applications have become an integral part of our lives. In the beginning, their use was not very wide, they were mainly used for messaging and communication. But in the last couple of years, advancements in technology have allowed de...