The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

How risky is turbulence on a plane? How worried should I be?

  • Written by Hassan Vally, Associate Professor, Epidemiology, Deakin University
How risky is turbulence on a plane? How worried should I be?

The Singapore Airlines turbulence incident[1] that has sadly left one person dead and others hospitalised has made many of us think about the risks of air travel.

We’ll hear more in coming days about how the aircraft came to drop so suddenly on its route from London to Singapore earlier this week, injuring passengers and crew, before making an emergency landing in Thailand.

But thankfully, these types of incidents are rare[2], and much less-common[3] than injuries from other types of transport.

So why do we sometimes think the risk of getting injured while travelling by plane is higher than it really is?

How common are turbulence injuries?

Turbulence[4] is caused by[5] the irregular movement of air, leading to passengers and crew experiencing abrupt sideways and vertical jolts.

In the case of the Singapore Airlines flight, this type of turbulence is thought to be a severe example of “clear-air turbulence[6]”, which can occur without warning. There are several other types.

About 25 in-flight turbulence injuries are reported[7] to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau each year, although it is thought many more are un-reported. Some of these reported injuries are serious, including broken bones and head injuries. Passengers being thrown up and out of their seat during turbulence is one of the most common type of head injury on a plane.

Other injuries from turbulence are caused by contact with flying laptops, or other unsecured items.

In one example[8] of clear-air turbulence that came without warning, cabin crew, passengers and meal trolleys hit the ceiling, and landed heavily back on the floor. Serious injuries included bone fractures, lacerations, neck and back strains, a dislocated shoulder and shattered teeth. Almost all of those seriously injured did not have their seat belts fastened.

But we need to put this into perspective. In the year to January 2024, there were more than 36 million[9] passengers on international flights to Australia. In the year to February 2024, there were more than 58 million[10] passengers on domestic flights.

So while such incidents grab the headlines, they are exceedingly rare.

Why do we think flying is riskier than it is?

When we hear about this recent Singapore Airlines incident, it’s entirely natural to have a strong emotional reaction. We might have imagined the terror we might feel if we were on the aircraft at the time.

But our emotional response alters our perception[11] of the risk and leads us to think these rare incidents are more common than they really are.

Thinking, Fast and Slow
Penguin Press[12] There is a vast body of literature addressing the numerous factors[13] that influence how individuals perceive risk and the cognitive biases we are all subject to that mislead us. Nobel Prize-winning economist Daniel Kahneman[14] covers them in his bestselling book Thinking, Fast and Slow[15]. He describes the way we respond to risks is not rational, but driven by emotion. Kahneman also highlights the fact that our brains are not wired to make sense of extremely small risks. So these types of risks – such as the chance of serious injury or death from in-flight turbulence – are hard for us to make sense of. The more unusual an event is, and this was a very unusual event, Kahneman says the more impact it makes on our psyche and the more likely we are to overestimate the risk. Of course, the more unusual the event, the more likely[16] it is for it to be in the media, amplifying this effect. Similarly, the easier it is to imagine an event[17], the more it affects our perception and the more likely we are to respond to an event as if it were much more likely to occur. How can we make sense of the risk? One way to make sense of activities with small, hard-to-understand risks is by comparing their risks to the risks of more familiar activities. If we do this, the data shows very clearly that it is much more risky[18] to drive a car or ride a motorbike than to travel by plane. While events such as the Singapore Airlines incident are devastating and stir up lots of emotions, it’s important to recognise how our emotions can mislead us to over-estimate the risk of this happening again, or to us. Apart from the stress and anxiety this provokes, overestimating the risks of particular activities may lead us to make bad decisions that actually put us at greater risk of harm. References^ turbulence incident (www.abc.net.au)^ are rare (www.atsb.gov.au)^ less-common (www.aihw.gov.au)^ Turbulence (theconversation.com)^ is caused by (www.atsb.gov.au)^ clear-air turbulence (www.theguardian.com)^ are reported (www.atsb.gov.au)^ one example (www.atsb.gov.au)^ more than 36 million (www.bitre.gov.au)^ more than 58 million (www.bitre.gov.au)^ alters our perception (psycnet.apa.org)^ Penguin Press (www.penguin.com.au)^ numerous factors (theconversation.com)^ Daniel Kahneman (www.nobelprize.org)^ Thinking, Fast and Slow (www.penguin.com.au)^ more likely (psycnet.apa.org)^ imagine an event (www.sciencedirect.com)^ more risky (www.aihw.gov.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-risky-is-turbulence-on-a-plane-how-worried-should-i-be-230665

Active Wear

Times Magazine

How to Reduce Eye Strain When Using an Extra Screen

Many professionals say two screens are better than one. And they're not wrong! A second screen mak...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Kindness Tops the List: New Survey Reveals Australia’s Defining Value

Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.  In a time where headlines are dominat...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

The Times Features

Research uncovering a plant based option for PMS & period pain

With as many as eight in 10 women experiencing period pain, and up to half reporting  premenstru...

Trump presidency and Australia

Is Having Donald Trump as President Beneficial to Australia — and Why? Donald Trump’s return to...

Why Generosity Is the Most Overlooked Business Strategy

When people ask me what drives success, I always smile before answering. Because after two decades...

Some people choosing DIY super are getting bad advice, watchdog warns

It’s no secret Australians are big fans[1] of a do-it-yourself (DIY) project. How many other cou...

Myer celebrates 70 years of Christmas windows magic with the LEGO Group

To mark the 70th anniversary of the Myer Christmas Windows, Australia’s favourite department store...

Pharmac wants to trim its controversial medicines waiting list – no list at all might be better

New Zealand’s drug-buying agency Pharmac is currently consulting[1] on a change to how it mana...

NRMA Partnership Unlocks Cinema and Hotel Discounts

My NRMA Rewards, one of Australia’s largest membership and benefits programs, has announced a ne...

Restaurants to visit in St Kilda and South Yarra

Here are six highly-recommended restaurants split between the seaside suburb of St Kilda and the...

The Year of Actually Doing It

There’s something about the week between Christmas and New Year’s that makes us all pause and re...