The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

what 70 years of research tells us about children and screens

  • Written by Taren Sanders, Research Fellow, Institute for Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University
what 70 years of research tells us about children and screens

Ask any parent and it’s likely they’ll tell you they’re worried about their kids’ screen time. A 2021 poll[1] found it was Australian parents’ number one health concern for their kids – ahead of cyberbullying and unhealthy diets. But how worried should parents be?

The information that’s out there can be confusing. Some psychologists have compared it to smoking[2] (amid concerns about “secondhand screen time”), while others are telling us not to worry[3] too much about kids and screens.

Academics are also confused. As The Lancet noted[4] in 2019, researchers’ understanding of the benefits, risks and harms of the digital landscape is “sorely lacking”.

In our new research[5], we wanted to give parents, policymakers and researchers a comprehensive summary of the best evidence on the influence of screens on children’s physical and psychological health, education and development.

What we did

Meta-analyses[6] are one of the best forms of evidence because they summarise the findings of lots of research all at once.

This can give us a much better view of what is happening than just looking at a single study of one group of people. So we gathered all meta-analyses conducted in English on any form of screen time in children, regardless of the outcome.

We found 217 meta-analyses, with almost half published in just the last two years. These meta-analyses represent the findings from 2,451 individual studies and have a combined sample size of more than 1.9 million children and adolescents up to 18 years. The individual studies were done between 1954 and 2021 and the meta-analyses were done between 1982 and 2022.

Three children sit on a couch with phone and tablets.
Our research involved more than 2,400 studies. Jessica Lewis/Pexels, CC BY-SA[7][8]

The good news

We found some things that should reassure parents.

The overall size of the influence of screens across the outcomes (for example, depression, body weight, literacy and sleep) in children were small.

Almost all of the results had correlations less than 0.2, which is about the same as the correlation between height and intelligence[9]. That doesn’t mean the effect for an individual child will always be that small, just that on average, the relationship is small.

How kids use screens matters

We also found it’s not the screen itself that really matters but what’s on it and the way kids use it.

Television is a form of screen time that has worried parents for more than half a century[10]. We did find general television viewing was associated with poorer academic performance and literacy skills. Our study did not give us time limits, but found a linear relationship. That is, the more TV a child watched, the poorer their literacy skills were.

But if the program was educational or if the child was watching with a parent, we found there was a benefit to their literacy. This is probably because it gives parents an opportunity to talk about things in the show (“I think Bluey is feeling dissapointed”) or ask questions (“what is Bingo drawing?”) which develops language skills[11].

Read more: More Bluey, less PAW Patrol: why Australian parents want locally made TV for their kids[12]

The not so good news

A young woman sits on a chair, looking at a phone.
Our research found more social media use was associated with mental health issues and risk taking. Liza Summer/Pexels, CC BY-SA[13][14]

We did find some forms of screen time are consistently associated with harm and had no evidence of benefits.

Chief among these was social media, which was associated with depression, anxiety and risk taking. Again, our research found a relationship between the more time a child spent on social media, the more likely they were to have a mental health issue.

This is similar to the advice released this year from the US Surgeon General[15]. This noted while social media could provide community and connections for young people (particularly from marginalised groups), it could also harm their mental health.

Read more: Excessive screen time can affect young people's emotional development[16]

What does it mean?

As other education experts have noted[17], “screen time” is a bit of a useless term.

Nobody thinks facetiming Nanna and scrolling TikTok are equivalent, but both would fall into the category of “recreational screen time” in the Australian guidelines[18].

So, a key message from our study is to focus less on an unachievable time limit[19], and instead focus on what kids are actually doing on screens. Try to steer them towards educational apps, TV programs and video games.

But it can’t be education all the time – kids also need time for recreation. And if you watch with your child, it can also have benefits.

Read more: If your kid is home sick from school, is unlimited screen time OK?[20]

Don’t forget to be active

Regardless of what screen-based activities you choose to allow, remember most screen time is sedentary. Long periods of sitting aren’t great for kids (or adults!), so breaking up these periods with movement is still important.

Ultimately, the most important factor for child development is quality parenting[21]. Being present, spending quality time and creating a caring environment are what really make a difference for children[22]. You matter more to your child’s mental and physical health than the screen.

References

  1. ^ poll (rchpoll.org.au)
  2. ^ compared it to smoking (www.rd.com)
  3. ^ not to worry (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ noted (www.thelancet.com)
  5. ^ our new research (www.nature.com)
  6. ^ Meta-analyses (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ Jessica Lewis/Pexels (www.pexels.com)
  8. ^ CC BY-SA (creativecommons.org)
  9. ^ correlation between height and intelligence (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  10. ^ more than half a century (www.jstor.org)
  11. ^ develops language skills (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  12. ^ More Bluey, less PAW Patrol: why Australian parents want locally made TV for their kids (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ Liza Summer/Pexels (www.pexels.com)
  14. ^ CC BY-SA (creativecommons.org)
  15. ^ US Surgeon General (www.hhs.gov)
  16. ^ Excessive screen time can affect young people's emotional development (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ education experts have noted (theconversation.com)
  18. ^ Australian guidelines (www.health.gov.au)
  19. ^ unachievable time limit (theconversation.com)
  20. ^ If your kid is home sick from school, is unlimited screen time OK? (theconversation.com)
  21. ^ quality parenting (developingchild.harvard.edu)
  22. ^ make a difference for children (raisingchildren.net.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/tv-can-be-educational-but-social-media-likely-harms-mental-health-what-70-years-of-research-tells-us-about-children-and-screens-216638

Times Magazine

Can bigger-is-better ‘scaling laws’ keep AI improving forever? History says we can’t be too sure

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman – perhaps the most prominent face of the artificial intellig...

A backlash against AI imagery in ads may have begun as brands promote ‘human-made’

In a wave of new ads, brands like Heineken, Polaroid and Cadbury have started hating on artifici...

Home batteries now four times the size as new installers enter the market

Australians are investing in larger home battery set ups than ever before with data showing the ...

Q&A with Freya Alexander – the young artist transforming co-working spaces into creative galleries

As the current Artist in Residence at Hub Australia, Freya Alexander is bringing colour and creativi...

This Christmas, Give the Navman Gift That Never Stops Giving – Safety

Protect your loved one’s drives with a Navman Dash Cam.  This Christmas don’t just give – prote...

Yoto now available in Kmart and The Memo, bringing screen-free storytelling to Australian families

Yoto, the kids’ audio platform inspiring creativity and imagination around the world, has launched i...

The Times Features

Here’s what new debt-to-income home loan caps mean for banks and borrowers

For the first time ever, the Australian banking regulator has announced it will impose new debt-...

Why the Mortgage Industry Needs More Women (And What We're Actually Doing About It)

I've been in fintech and the mortgage industry for about a year and a half now. My background is i...

Inflation jumps in October, adding to pressure on government to make budget savings

Annual inflation rose[1] to a 16-month high of 3.8% in October, adding to pressure on the govern...

Transforming Addiction Treatment Marketing Across Australasia & Southeast Asia

In a competitive and highly regulated space like addiction treatment, standing out online is no sm...

Aiper Scuba X1 Robotic Pool Cleaner Review: Powerful Cleaning, Smart Design

If you’re anything like me, the dream is a pool that always looks swimmable without you having to ha...

YepAI Emerges as AI Dark Horse, Launches V3 SuperAgent to Revolutionize E-commerce

November 24, 2025 – YepAI today announced the launch of its V3 SuperAgent, an enhanced AI platf...

What SMEs Should Look For When Choosing a Shared Office in 2026

Small and medium-sized enterprises remain the backbone of Australia’s economy. As of mid-2024, sma...

Anthony Albanese Probably Won’t Lead Labor Into the Next Federal Election — So Who Will?

As Australia edges closer to the next federal election, a quiet but unmistakable shift is rippli...

Top doctors tip into AI medtech capital raise a second time as Aussie start up expands globally

Medow Health AI, an Australian start up developing AI native tools for specialist doctors to  auto...