The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
Times Media

.

How term limits for Australian political leaders could build a stronger democracy

  • Written by Paul Strangio, Professor of Politics, Monash University

King George III reputedly said of the inaugural US president, George Washington, on learning the American had declined a third term of office, that he was “the greatest character of the age”. George III marvelled at Washington because, despite entreaties that he continue as president, Washington had voluntarily ceded power. He had resisted the temptation to become a quasi monarch.

George Washington set the precedent of presidents serving for only two terms, or eight years.

By relinquishing office after two terms (eight years), Washington established an important and influential precedent in the fledgling American republic. His presidential successors faithfully abided by that precedent until Franklin Roosevelt, amid the exigency of the second world war, successfully stood for a third and then fourth term of office in 1940 and 1944 respectively.

Roosevelt’s break with the tradition of a maximum two term presidency was controversial. In its wake, the 22nd amendment[1] to the American constitution was ratified in 1951, limiting the number of terms a person can be elected to the presidency to two. Washington’s principle had been codified.

Limiting the duration of a presidency is regarded in the US as one of the bulwarks against the development of an unhealthy concentration of authority in any one site. It is specifically a safeguard against one person accumulating too much power. It is one of the checks and balances built into the republic’s intricate liberal democratic constitutional architecture.

How does Australia compare?

Obviously, we do not have a presidency. America has a single-person executive with authority granted exclusively to the president. In contrast, our Westminster-derived system of parliamentary government is anchored in the principle of cabinet or collective rule. Executive authority is meant to be dispersed among a group of actors rather than solely vested in a supreme leader.

Yet for some time, close observers of government in Australia (and comparable parliamentary democracies) have described a phenomenon of presidentialisation. That is, there are forces concentrating power in the hands of the head of government, creating a kind of de facto presidency.

These forces include the dense growth of executive resources around the leader, most notably a personal advisory system – it is a machinery that no other government member comes close to having access to. Another is the increased habit of leaders to rule not through the cabinet as a whole but through small cabinet subcommittees, a practice that facilitates the leader’s domination of government decision making.

Read more: Strong political leaders are electoral gold – but the trick is in them knowing when to stand down[2]

Then there is the relationship between government, the media and the public. Governments market their message predominantly through the leader and in turn, the media focus attention on the government head. In this environment, the public comes to think of government as an individual enterprise and increasingly makes assessments about politics on the basis of their view of the leader rather than the collective. This trend is badged the personalisation of politics.

During his four terms as PM, John Howard steadfastly refused to make way for his deputy, Peter Costello. 

If government in Australia has become so leader-centred (at both national and sub-national level), would it be healthy for our democracy to time limit their tenure? I can think of two recent examples where a leader has arguably stayed too long, has grown untouchable in their own government, producing adverse results.

The first is John Howard’s government of 1996 to 2007. The Howard government was at its best in its second term (1998 to 2001), when it legislated comprehensive taxation reform headlined by the introduction of the GST. Thereafter, it ran short of purpose. Instead, Howard seemed to become addicted to ruling for its own sake.

His administration resorted increasingly to whipping up crises (the Northern Territory intervention[3], for example) and sowing division as a means to garner political support. Supreme within his government and convinced of his own indispensability, Howard stymied a succession to Peter Costello while finally overreaching by imposing a radical industrial relations regime[4].

The second is Daniel Andrews’ Victorian government, in office since 2014. Over that period, Andrews has built an impressive edifice of progressive measures – just one example being his government leading the nation in treaty-making with First Nations communities[5].

Yet that record of enlightened reform has always coexisted somewhat uneasily with the premier’s controlling hard man ruling style. More unsettling, with Andrews shortly to become Victoria’s third longest serving premier, his forcefulness has morphed into something darker and oppressive. His is now an unsmiling leadership unsoftened by conciliation or humility. Witness, for instance, his imperious responses to IBAC findings, his high-handed freezing out of certain journalists and his defiant lack of contrition for the Commonwealth Games cancellation fiasco.

Backed by a mighty advisory apparatus, Andrews dominates his party and government to a chilling degree. Their leader for nearly 13 years, his colleagues are cowed by him.

Long-term leadership is not intrinsically a bad thing. To the contrary, good leaders grow in office becoming better at statecraft. But there does seem a point when prolonged possession of power dulls capacity for self-reflection and self-restraint. Hubris follows. The challenge is confining leaders to their governing sweet spot.

In a parliamentary system like ours there is, of course, no practical means for importing the device of time limits for leaders. Yet in its absence we ought to expect parties, rather than genuflecting before strong leaders, to have the mettle to restrain them.

And, finally, we as voters have a role in checking leaders by demanding from them a heavier burden of proof when they ask for additional tenure come election time.

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-term-limits-for-australian-political-leaders-could-build-a-stronger-democracy-213063

The Times Features

The Importance of Regular Roof and Gutter Maintenance for Adelaide Home

The Importance of Regular Roof and Gutter Maintenance for Adelaide Homes Your roof and gutters can be integral to maintaining the structural integrity and aesthetic appeal of yo...

Designer Wardrobe reports surge in pre-loved wedding gowns

As Australia’s wedding season approaches, and amidst a challenging cost of living backdrop, new insights from Designer Wardrobe reveal that Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) brid...

DIY Bathroom Remodel: Essential Tips for a Fresh Look

As the home improvement craze continues to grow, more folks are diving into the world of DIY projects to transform their living spaces. Among these, bathroom remodels have gain...

STI rates are increasing among midlife and older adults. We need to talk about it

Globally, the rates of common sexually transmissible infections[1] (STIs) are increasing among people aged over 50. In some cases, rates are rising faster than among younger pe...

The Gift That Keeps Growing: Why Tinybeans+ Gift Cards are a game-changer for new parents

As new parents navigate the joys and challenges of raising a child in the digital age, one question looms large: how do you preserve and share your baby's milestones without co...

Group Adventures Made Easy: How to Coordinate Shuttle Services from DCA to IAD

Traveling as a large group can be both exciting and challenging, especially when navigating busy airports like DCA (Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport) and IAD (Washington...

Times Magazine

The Benefits of School Excursions to Underwater Worlds

Exploring the mystical depths of underwater worlds holds an unparalleled charm, especially for young minds eager to learn and discover. School excursions to places like aquariums offer more than just a day away from the classroom; they present a un...

Credit Card Compare Australia on Major Rebuild and Relaunch

David Boyd's entrepreneurial journey is a compelling narrative of innovation, relentless pursuit of goals, and a firm belief in the transformative power of technology. He immigrated from Northern Ireland to Australia in 2003. Boyd became known as a...

Things you need to know about certificate iii in mobile plant technology

g Certification is very important for all types of work in the industry. To succeed in the field, you need to complete the certification in the required field that you opt for. You can keep industrial technology working at peak capacity with certi...

Best Brisbane Personal Injury Lawyers: Finding No-Win, No-Fee Lawyers to Represent You

Navigating a personal injury claim can be an overwhelming experience, particularly when compounded by the financial stress that often accompanies trauma. Fortunately, Brisbane boasts a number of personal injury lawyers who offer no win, no fee arra...

Reasons Why You Should Hire A Marketing Agency If You Want Your Company To Rank Better On Google

A solid online presence is essential for every company's success in the modern digital era. Ranking high on search engine results pages (SERPs) has become a primary goal since the great majority of consumers use search engines like Google to loca...

How DevOps Course Is Revolutionizing Modern Software Development

In order to provide products and services more quickly and effectively, DevOps is a software engineering technique that integrates software development (Dev) with IT operations (Ops). It places a strong emphasis on automating software deployment, inf...