The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Jason Clare has just put the Australian Research Council on notice. This brings (some) good news for academics

  • Written by Sue Bennett, Senior Professor, University of Wollongong

This week Education Minister Jason Clare has kicked off what could be a major reset of university research funding in Australia.

He first announced a review of the Australian Research Council (ARC) in July but released the details[1] of how it would work on Tuesday. He also released a strongly worded “letter of expectations[2]” about the ARC’s work for the rest of 2022.

This follows serious concerns about ministerial interference[3] in funding decisions under the Morrison government. It also follows ongoing frustrations and heartache within the academic community over the huge amount of work involved in applying for grants, the low rates of success[4] and long waits[5] for outcomes.

There are both encouraging moves and some worrying signs in the new government’s approach to the ARC.

What is the ARC?

The ARC is the independent body that funds non-medical university research in Australia. It issues about A$800 million[6] in funding each year.

A successful grant is one of the key ways an academic progresses their career. So there is a lot that rides on ARC decisions.

Read more: 7 things the Australian Research Council review should tackle, from a researcher's point of view[7]

What did Clare announce?

On Tuesday, Clare made public a letter[8] he sent to ARC Chief Executive Officer Judi Zielke last Friday. The letter contains Clare’s “expectations” for the research council in 2022. This includes:

  • minimising the administrative burden on researchers applying for funding

  • delivering all future grants rounds on time and to a pre-determined timeframe

  • keeping the controversial “national interest test”, but making it “clearer”

  • stopping work on the Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) 2023 round.

Clare also gave us the details[9] about an independent review of the ARC’s role, purpose, functions and structures. The review will look at whether the 2001 legislation[10] governing the ARC has kept pace with its current responsibilities and compare it to similar bodies internationally.

The review starts next month and will report back by the end of March 2023. It will be lead by Queensland University of Technology Vice Chancellor Professor Margaret Sheil.

The review is on top of an internal ARC review about its processes that is already under way.

What is the good news?

The big surprise is that work stops on the ERA’s 2023 round[11]. ERA assesses the quality of the research universities have published and been funded for, against international benchmarks.

Clare has asked this work to be stopped to reduce the workload on universities - and to prepare for a more “modern data-driven” approach. The news takes some immediate pressure off researchers, which will be welcome in universities still under pressure from COVID disruptions.

Streamlining administrative processes when applying for funding is also a welcome move. Set timeframes for research round outcomes will reduce uncertainty and make planning easier.

Researchers and support teams spend hundreds of hours preparing applications. These are then assessed by expert reviewers, leading to a set of grants recommended to the minister for funding. The process takes many months and involves a huge volume of applications, most of which will be unsuccessful[12].

It is a bruising, competitive system in which many excellent projects never get funded. Reducing the burden of applying while maintaining quality will be critical.

It is also encouraging that this government is making signals it values a wider scope of research than the previous government. The terms of the ARC review refer to adequate funding for areas of “national significance” that “reap dividends for society” as well as the economy.

What is the bad news?

Academics will be disappointed the much criticised[13] “national interest test”, introduced by former Coalition Education Minister Dan Tehan in 2018 will stay. Here, researchers must write a statement explaining their research in non-academic language, to be judged by small panel that advises whether the research should be funded. This is separate to the assessment by academic experts.

Read more: ARC grants: if Australia wants to tackle the biggest issues, politicians need to stop meddling with basic research[14]

There is no doubt researchers should be accountable for the public funds allocated to their research. But the test has been widely criticised[15] by researchers and university leaders as counter-productive to funding good quality research.

The ministerial veto also remains – at least for now. This has been one of the most controversial aspects of the grants process, with Coalition ministers, including most recently Stuart Robert[16], rejecting proposals after they have been approved by the ARC.

As the ministerial veto power is part of the legislation[17] it can be considered under the independent review. It has already come under scrutiny from a Senate inquiry[18] in the last parliament.

What is missing?

What isn’t mentioned so far is what this reset could mean for Australia’s national research priorities[19], which date back to 2015.

Under the Coalition, research priorities were narrowed[20] at the expense of the humanities and social sciences.

Stuart Robert at a press conference in Canberra.
Former Acting Education Minister Stuart Robert vetoed six applications for funding in late 2021. Mick Tsikas/AAP

We can’t address the complex problems we face as a nation without understanding social factors and experiences – every scientific challenge has a human dimension. This is a chance for the new government to modernise our research priorities as well.

Also not mentioned explicitly is how the system of grant funding is performing on a range of key measures. We need to address gender equality[21] around successful recipients and expand Indigenous-led research. These are wider challenges to building Australia’s research capacity to be more inclusive and the ARC has a key role here.

What does this mean for researchers?

Right now for researchers involved in preparing for ERA 2023 there’s immediate relief, which means more time for other research activities.

More significantly is some restoration of hope that a better, more respectful and fairer system may be on the horizon.

We need a government that appreciates research cannot be expected to deliver quick fixes. It takes many years for research findings to result in tangible benefits for society.

All eyes will be on the review’s report in March 2023.

References

  1. ^ details (www.dese.gov.au)
  2. ^ letter of expectations (www.arc.gov.au)
  3. ^ ministerial interference (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ low rates of success (www.arc.gov.au)
  5. ^ long waits (www.timeshighereducation.com)
  6. ^ A$800 million (www.theguardian.com)
  7. ^ 7 things the Australian Research Council review should tackle, from a researcher's point of view (theconversation.com)
  8. ^ a letter (www.arc.gov.au)
  9. ^ details (www.dese.gov.au)
  10. ^ 2001 legislation (www.legislation.gov.au)
  11. ^ 2023 round (www.arc.gov.au)
  12. ^ be unsuccessful (www.arc.gov.au)
  13. ^ much criticised (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ ARC grants: if Australia wants to tackle the biggest issues, politicians need to stop meddling with basic research (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ widely criticised (www.theguardian.com)
  16. ^ most recently Stuart Robert (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ part of the legislation (www.legislation.gov.au)
  18. ^ Senate inquiry (www.aph.gov.au)
  19. ^ national research priorities (www.arc.gov.au)
  20. ^ narrowed (theconversation.com)
  21. ^ gender equality (www.arc.gov.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/jason-clare-has-just-put-the-australian-research-council-on-notice-this-brings-some-good-news-for-academics-189691

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Duke of Dural to Get Rooftop Bar as New Owners Invest in Venue Upgrade

The Duke of Dural, in Sydney’s north-west, is set for a major uplift under new ownership, following its acquisition by hospitality group Good Beer Company this week. Led by resp...

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...

The Role of Your GP in Creating a Chronic Disease Management Plan That Works

Living with a long-term condition, whether that is diabetes, asthma, arthritis or heart disease, means making hundreds of small decisions every day. You plan your diet against m...