Hunger is increasing worldwide but women bear the brunt of food insecurity

Recent UN data on food insecurity^[1] paints a bleak picture of a growing international problem: global hunger is not only growing but it disproportionately affects women. Similarly, the international humanitarian aid organisation, CARE^[2], estimates that 150 million more women than men went hungry in 2021.

Despite gains in global food security since 2015, food security has gone backwards, with an increase of 150 million people experiencing hunger since 2019.

Read more: Feeding the world: addressing gender divides could help reduce malnutrition ^[3]

The UN reports that globally, 2.3 billion people were food insecure in 2021 with 276 million (12%) facing severe food insecurity. This rapid and sustained increase in hunger over a short time is highly concerning. So too, is the growing gender gap^[4], with 32% of women compared to 27.5% of men going hungry.

Why are women more affected by food insecurity than men?

To answer this question, the global food system needs to be understood as a mirror of society. It reflects income inequalities and the uneven distribution of goods and services and, as such, is likely to show the same underlying structural inequalities as society at large.

The causes of food insecurity are complex and multi-dimensional. However, two important dimensions are the availability of food (is there enough food?) and the accessibility of food (is it affordable?).

Recently, the availability of food has been challenged by climate crises, conflicts, and disruptions due to the COVID-19 pandemic. At the same time, cost of living pressures have pushed the accessibility of food beyond the means of many people in both developed and developing countries.

Read more: Food democracy: why eating is unavoidably political^[5]

On official measures of gender equality, women tend to experience a lower socio-economic^[6] status than men. Globally, 388 million women and girls live in extreme poverty right now, compared to 372 million men and boys. Oxfam^[7] reports that women earn 24% less than men, work longer hours, have more precarious work and do at least twice as much unpaid work.

The impact of other forms of inequality

Income disparities are also important to consider. Even when food is in abundance, with a few exceptions, it cannot be accessed without money. Accordingly, a bigger gender gap in income equality^[8] also means women have fewer means to purchase food.

The disadvantage of women has also been described in terms of their lack of agency to change their circumstances. In developing countries where subsistence farming is a key means of food provision, structural inequalities in land tenure^[9] and access to credit undermine women’s ability to generate income. Women make up 43% of the agricultural workforce^[10], yet own less than 15%^[11] of land.

Improved women’s agency^[12] is strongly correlated with a reduction in poverty and has been recognised by the Higher Level Panel of Experts on Food Security^[13] as a critical dimension^[14] of food security.

Australia also has severe food insecurity, but women aren’t counted

Despite being the “lucky country,” Australia does not have a food security policy, nor does it collect the data necessary for an informed and targeted response.

Read more: Hunger in the lucky country – charities step in where government fails^[15]

In fact, the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry^[16] argues that concerns about food security are “understandable, yet misplaced” because Australia “[…] produces substantially more food than it consumes.”

The narrative might work in terms of availability of food but overlooks key issues regarding its accessibility, including gender dimensions, the difference between individual, household and domestic food security, and the link between poverty and food insecurity.

Some of these data gaps have been filled by Food Bank, a food relief organisation, that conducts annual surveys^[17] on food insecurity in Australia. Their recent data reveals 17% of Australian adults are “severely” food insecure. While the data is not segregated by gender, we can surmise a food insecurity gap if we use income as a proxy.

References

1. ^{^} data on food insecurity (www.fao.org)
2. ^{^} CARE (www.careevaluations.org)
3. ^{^} Feeding the world: addressing gender divides could help reduce malnutrition (theconversation.com)
4. ^{^} growing gender gap (www.fao.org)
5. ^{^} Food democracy: why eating is unavoidably political (theconversation.com)
6. ^{^} socio-economic (data.unwomen.org)
7. ^{^} Oxfam (www.oxfam.org)
8. ^{^} income equality (www.unwomen.org)
9. ^{^} land tenure (doi.org)
10. ^{^} agricultural workforce (www.fao.org)
11. ^{^} 15% (doi.org)
12. ^{^} women’s agency (www.oxfam.org)
13. ^{^} Higher Level Panel of Experts on Food Security (www.fao.org)
14. ^{^} critical dimension (www.sciencedirect.com)
15. ^{^} Hunger in the lucky country – charities step in where government fails (theconversation.com)
16. ^{^} Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (www.agriculture.gov.au)
17. ^{^} annual surveys (reports.foodbank.org.au)
18. ^{^} Australian parliament (www.aph.gov.au)
19. ^{^} Don't panic: Australia has truly excellent food security (theconversation.com)
20. ^{^} all regions (www.fao.org)