The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

A simple calculation can stop artificial intelligence sending you broke

  • Written by Evan Shellshear, Industry Fellow, The University of Queensland
A simple calculation can stop artificial intelligence sending you broke

Mike is a 40-something crop farmer from southern Queensland. With a chestnut tan, crushing handshake and a strong outback accent, he’s the third generation of his family to grow sorghum, a cereal mostly used for animal fodder[1].

But, like most farmers, Mike faces more challenges than his forbears. Climate change has eroded Australian farms’ profitability by an average of 23% over the past 20 years[2]. It’s a constant challenge to improve productivity by producing more with less.

Read more: Australian farmers are adapting well to climate change, but there's work ahead[3]

After the devastating 2019 bushfire season, Mike began exploring Smart farming techniques enabled by artificial intelligence (AI). Agriculture has been called one of the most fertile industries[4] for AI and machine learning. Mike was enthused about an AI powered system enabling him to use less fertiliser and water.

After months of inquiries he found a company promising its technology could reduce crop inputs by up to 80%. It involved software processing information from digital sensors placed across his fields to allow “precision farming” – tailoring water, pest and fertiliser treatment for each plant.

The salesperson’s pitch was compelling. But the cost to install the system was $500,000, plus $80,000 a year for data storage and processing. Support costs were on top of that.

Ultimately, Mike calculated[5] the cost would offset any extra profit generated, even if the slick technology lived up to all the promises. If it delivered less, it would only help him into bankruptcy.

This experience – of being pitched an AI technology with big claims but questionable value – is common. It’s easy to be swayed by the promises. But new technology is not the solution to everything. For it to be worth the money for people like Mike – indeed any organisation – requires a cold calculation of its economic value.

In this article we provide a simple methodology to do so.

Blinded by technological potential

For all the focus now on how AI will revolutionise the world, hype about it isn’t new. Since the inception of practical AI techniques in the early 1960s, obsession with AI potential has led to two major “AI winters” – in which huge investments by corporations and research institutions failed to deliver promised results.

The first was in the 1970s, when money poured into variety of AI systems such as speech recognition and machine translation[6]. The second was in the 1980s, when companies invested heavily in so-called “expert systems[7]” meant to do things like diagnose illnesses or control space shuttle launches.

Computer scientist John McCarthy, who coined the term 'AI', at work in his laboratory at Stanford University.
Computer scientist John McCarthy, who coined the term ‘AI’, at work in his laboratory at Stanford University. AP

In both cases what the technology could do fell well short of the hype. It was not that AI was useless. Far from it. But what it could do had limited economic value.

The backlash set the scientific and economic advance of the technology back almost a decade both times, as funding and interest dissipated.

To be sure your investment in technology is worth the money, you need to guard against being swept up by the promises and possibilities.

As Ben Robinson, the chief strategy officer at financial software company Temenos has put it[8]:

we can safely predict it won’t be blockchain or APIs or AI that transform the industry. Instead it will be new business models empowered by those technologies.

Read more: If machines can be inventors, could AI soon monopolise technology?[9]

Focus on the economics

The following figures outline a simple approach to focus on the economics, not the engineering.

Figure 1 summarises the basic economics of any investment decision. Invest if the extra profit is greater than the “opportunity cost” – the benefit you can gain from spending your money another way, or by not spending the money.

Figure 1 can be hard to use so Figure 2 frames the investment decision in slightly more detailed terms using the economic concept of “marginal utility” – the additional (marginal) benefit (utility) that comes from additional expenditure.

To make this simple to apply, Figure 3 summarises this decision-making process into a simple “decision tree”.

The Conversation/Author provided, CC BY-ND[10] Resolving Mike’s AI investment challenge Applying this methodology to Mike’s situation, we can see why he couldn’t make business sense of the pitch of AI-enabled precision farming. The salesperson passed the first question by stating the gains from AI adoption would reduce Mike’s crop input costs by up to 80%. This would translate to Mike saving about $80,000 per year (in the best-case scenario). The salesperson also passed the second question, with a clear statement of the system’s cost. But the business case failed on the third question. The best-case marginal benefit of adopting the AI (saving $80,000 a year) was just equal to the marginal cost ($80,000 a year) – not counting the initial installation. Read more: Artificial intelligence is now part of our everyday lives – and its growing power is a double-edged sword[11] Putting it this way makes it clearly look like a dud investment, and that Mike didn’t have put a lot of time into deciding against it. But the fact is many decisions to invest in AI[12] don’t make economic sense and the above process will make this easy to know why. Using an economic framework of worth, rather than an engineering claim of possibility, is the first step to make better decisions. Doing so reduces the prospect of another AI winter, and increases the chance of real gains contributing to a more prosperous and sustainable world.

Read more https://theconversation.com/a-simple-calculation-can-stop-artificial-intelligence-sending-you-broke-173501

Active Wear

Times Magazine

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

End-of-Life Planning: Why Talking About Death With Family Makes Funeral Planning Easier

I spend a lot of time talking about death. Not in a morbid, gloomy way—but in the same way we d...

YepAI Joins Victoria's AI Trade Mission to Singapore for Big Data & AI World Asia 2025

YepAI, a Melbourne-based leader in enterprise artificial intelligence solutions, announced today...

Building a Strong Online Presence with Katoomba Web Design

Katoomba web design is more than just creating a website that looks good—it’s about building an onli...

September Sunset Polo

International Polo Tour To Bridge Historic Sport, Life-Changing Philanthropy, and Breath-Taking Beau...

The Times Features

Australia after the Trump–Xi meeting: sector-by-sector opportunities, risks, and realistic scenarios

How the U.S.–China thaw could play out across key sectors, with best case / base case / downside...

World Kindness Day: Commentary from Kath Koschel, founder of Kindness Factory.

What does World Kindness Day mean to you as an individual, and to the Kindness Factory as an organ...

HoMie opens new Emporium store as a hub for streetwear and community

Melbourne streetwear label HoMie has opened its new store in Emporium Melbourne, but this launch is ...

TAFE NSW empowers women with the skills for small business success

Across New South Wales, TAFE NSW graduates are turning their skills into success, taking what they h...

The median price of residential land sold nationally jumped by 6.8 per cent

Land prices a roadblock to 1.2 million homes target “The median price of residential land sold na...

Farm to Fork Australia Launches Exciting 7th Season on Ten

New Co-Host Magdalena Roze joining Michael Weldon, Courtney Roulston, Louis Tikaram, and Star Guest ...

How GST Revenue is Allocated to Each State or Territory

The Goods and Services Tax (GST) is one of the most important revenue streams for Australian gov...

In 2024, the climate crisis worsened in all ways. But we can still limit warming with bold action

Climate change has been on the world’s radar for decades[1]. Predictions made by scientists at...

Higher than expected inflation report dashes hopes for further RBA rate cuts

Inflation jumped 1.3% in the September quarter, above economists’ and the Reserve Bank’s own exp...