Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media

Labor’s fresh food tax figure plucked out of thin air



Labor is unable to explain its figures and reasoning behind the new fresh food tax on farmers and families.

The new tax, a biosecurity levy on farmers, will be set at a rate equivalent of 10 per cent of the 2020-21 industry-led levies, which is estimated to increase receipts by $153 million over three years from 2024-25.

During Senate Estimates Agriculture Minister Murray Watt justified the tax, saying it was a “shared responsibility” with Australian farmers as well as international importers.

However, when asked why the levy was set at a rate of 10 per cent, Minister Watt admitted he felt 10 per cent “was a fair contribution to make”.

When challenged if the figure had been plucked out of thin air, Minister Watt again replied “the government made a decision that that was a fair contribution”.

Leader of The Nationals and Shadow Agriculture Minister David Littleproud said it was disappointing Labor had failed to undertake any modelling before it started taxing Australian farmers to pay for the biosecurity risks of their foreign competitors.

“In what parallel universe does a sovereign government ask their own farmers to pay for the risks their foreign competitors pose to this country, so they can then compete with them here in Australia?” Mr Littleproud said.

“Labor seems to have simply come up with the figure of 10 per cent without modelling, a review or investigation. There is no quantitative basis or reasoning behind its new tax on farmers and its implications for Australian families.

“The Nationals, as part of a Coalition Government, will stop Labor’s new fresh food tax, in order to protect and support our farmers, while also helping to ease financial pressures on families.

“Instead of taxing Australian farmers, we will establish an ‘importer container levy’, as recommended by the independent Craik Biosecurity review.

“Under our plan, importers of foreign products will pay for the biosecurity risk they pose – not Australian farmers.”

Times Magazine

The $4,699 iPhone: why people still want Apple’s best

The iPhone 18 Pro Max can cost more than many people would spend on a computer. Its appeal says as...

BYD Shark 6 v Toyota LandCruiser 300: can new technology defeat an Australian legend?

The BYD Shark 6 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series may appear to belong in different vehicle catego...

Australia Needs Permission Budgets for AI Agents

The Times recently argued that Australia should keep building the data centres the AI economy requ...

Technology

The $4,699 iPhone: why people still…

The iPhone 18 Pro Max can cost more than many people would spend on a computer. Its appeal says as...

Local News

Fitstop Global Games to Bring 1,000…

The Australian-born fitness brand is bringing its global competition home, with athletes from across...

Culture

Healthy Spring Habits: Why Hydration Deserves…

Spring is here, and it's arrived warm. Sydney recorded temperatures more typical of midsummer in t...

Travel

School holiday pricing: fair market economics…

Every Australian family with school-aged children knows the pattern. Look at an airfare, hotel ro...

The Times Features

Australians Put Major Renovations on Hold and Turn to S…

Nearly half of Australian homeowners have delayed a major renovation in the past two years, accord...

Healthy Spring Habits: Why Hydration Deserves a Spot on…

Spring is here, and it's arrived warm. Sydney recorded temperatures more typical of midsummer in t...

Could a Prescription for a Bushwalk or Art Class Be the…

New social and nature prescribing hubs connect locals to community activities to combat loneliness...