Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

Labor’s fresh food tax figure plucked out of thin air



Labor is unable to explain its figures and reasoning behind the new fresh food tax on farmers and families.

The new tax, a biosecurity levy on farmers, will be set at a rate equivalent of 10 per cent of the 2020-21 industry-led levies, which is estimated to increase receipts by $153 million over three years from 2024-25.

During Senate Estimates Agriculture Minister Murray Watt justified the tax, saying it was a “shared responsibility” with Australian farmers as well as international importers.

However, when asked why the levy was set at a rate of 10 per cent, Minister Watt admitted he felt 10 per cent “was a fair contribution to make”.

When challenged if the figure had been plucked out of thin air, Minister Watt again replied “the government made a decision that that was a fair contribution”.

Leader of The Nationals and Shadow Agriculture Minister David Littleproud said it was disappointing Labor had failed to undertake any modelling before it started taxing Australian farmers to pay for the biosecurity risks of their foreign competitors.

“In what parallel universe does a sovereign government ask their own farmers to pay for the risks their foreign competitors pose to this country, so they can then compete with them here in Australia?” Mr Littleproud said.

“Labor seems to have simply come up with the figure of 10 per cent without modelling, a review or investigation. There is no quantitative basis or reasoning behind its new tax on farmers and its implications for Australian families.

“The Nationals, as part of a Coalition Government, will stop Labor’s new fresh food tax, in order to protect and support our farmers, while also helping to ease financial pressures on families.

“Instead of taxing Australian farmers, we will establish an ‘importer container levy’, as recommended by the independent Craik Biosecurity review.

“Under our plan, importers of foreign products will pay for the biosecurity risk they pose – not Australian farmers.”

Find out more. Get in touch with The Times.

Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input
Invalid Input

Times Magazine

Yoga and Tai Chi: Why Simple Movement Still Inspires Millions

In a world of high-intensity workouts, fitness technology and ever-changing exercise trends, two a...

Offshore vs Inshore Centre Console Boats: Which One Should You Buy?

Centre console boats have become one of the most popular choices among modern anglers. Their open ...

Why Australian Enterprises Are Rethinking Their Core Communication Technologies

The corporate landscape in Australia has undergone a permanent structural shift over the past few ...

Technology

Why Australian Enterprises Are Reth…

The corporate landscape in Australia has undergone a permanent structural shift over the past few ...

Local News

QLD Day

On Saturday 6 June, parkrun events across the state will be a sea of maroon, with communities  str...

Culture

Vaccinations in Australia: Who Needs Them, Wh…

Vaccination is one of Australia's greatest public health success stories. Diseases that once claim...

Travel

Sri Lanka: An Island Adventure That Delivers …

For Australian travellers looking for a destination that combines tropical beaches, ancient histor...

The Times Features

How to Choose Face Bricks for Australian Home Exteriors

Upgrading your home exterior is one of the most rewarding investments you can make as a property own...

Vaccinations in Australia: Who Needs Them, When and Why…

Vaccination is one of Australia's greatest public health success stories. Diseases that once claim...

Melbourne Weekend Property Tour: South of the Yarra

Melbourne's south side has long held a special place in the city's property market. Stretching fro...