The Times Australia
The Times News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Should Aussies stranded overseas go to the United Nations for help to get home?

  • Written by Jane McAdam, Scientia Professor and Director of the Kaldor Centre for International Refugee Law, UNSW

More than a year since COVID-19 emerged, there are nearly 40,000[1] Australians overseas who want to come home.

Geoffrey Robertson QC. Geoffrey Robertson QC. Lukas Coch/AAP

Amid mounting stories[2] of people desperate to return[3] for financial, family and personal reasons, Australians are stuck because of government caps[4] on international arrivals, transit-country restrictions[5] and expensive[6] and cancelled flights[7].

Prominent human rights barrister Geoffrey Robertson has suggested[8] Australians stranded overseas could make a successful complaint to the United Nations Human Rights Committee[9].

In his view, Australia’s caps on the number of returning travellers are a clear violation of international law.

There is certainly an arguable case Australia’s travel caps constitute an arbitrary restriction on Australians’ right to come home.

The UN Human Rights Committee says[10], as general rule, there are

few, if any, circumstances in which deprivation of the right to enter one’s own country could be reasonable.

But could a complaint to the Human Rights Committee offer stranded Aussies a quick return home?

Unfortunately, the short answer is, no.

The UN Human Rights Committee

The UN Human Rights Committee is composed of 18 independent, highly qualified human rights experts[11].

Among its functions, the committee can consider individual complaints[12]. The Australian government has agreed to this process.

Read more: Australians don't have a 'right' to travel. Does COVID mean our days of carefree overseas trips are over?[13]

This means any individual can lodge a complaint against Australia, arguing it has violated its human rights obligations towards them.

But even though this is free and legal representation is optional (albeit recommended), there are a number of other challenges.

Two big hurdles

Firstly, there is a procedural hurdle.

A person can only lodge a complaint with the committee if they have already exhausted all domestic remedies. That means they must have first gone through the Australian courts.

The committee can waive[14] this requirement, but only if it is clear the local process cannot provide an effective remedy, or if proceedings have been unreasonably prolonged.

UN headquarters in Geneva. The UN’s Human Rights Committee is made up of 18 experts. www.shutterstock.com

Secondly, the merits of the case are not quite as clear-cut as Robertson suggests.

There is no absolute right for a citizen to enter Australia — their entitlement is not to be “arbitrarily[15]” deprived of that right. This means the right may be subject to brief, temporary restrictions that are necessary, reasonable, and based on clear legal criteria — such as protecting the general public from the risks of COVID-19.

What about the #AusOpen?

Even so, it may well be possible for individuals to argue their right to return home is being unlawfully denied. Australia’s travel caps are only justifiable[16] under human rights law if there are no other, less restrictive measures that can be taken to safeguard public health.

So, the federal government needs to show why the caps remain necessary – especially when 1,200 tennis players[17] and their entourage were recently allowed to fly to Australia.

Read more: Self-entitled prima donnas or do they have a point? Why Australian Open tennis players find hard lockdown so tough[18]

Indeed, a Senate inquiry[19] suggested late last year that the federal government consider expanding Commonwealth-funded quarantine facilities to help stranded Australians get home, especially given its constitutional responsibilities for quarantine.

Two more hurdles

A third challenge is that even if the Human Rights Committee did find Australia had violated its international human rights obligations, Australia couldn’t be compelled to bring people home.

The UN human rights system relies on countries acknowledging and rectifying their breaches, but it can’t force their hand.

Elderly woman in mask waits at airport. Australians stuck overseas have spoken about the distress and hardship of not being able to return home. www.shutterstock.com

Australia has a pretty consistent track record[20] of disagreeing with the committee’s findings and refusing to follow its recommendations, especially concerning our treatment of asylum seekers.

A fourth challenge concerns the important issue of timing.

Even if a complaint were lodged today, it would take years before the committee could even consider its merits. As a matter of process, Australia would be given six months just to respond to the initial claim.

A glimmer of hope

There is one small window that could offer an earlier reprieve.

If a person could show that not being able to return to Australia would cause them “irreparable harm”, the committee might recommend “interim measures[21]”.

This is not a finding of a violation, but an urgent measure to avoid potential harm. Interim measures are commonly granted to restrain a country from doing something — for example, to halt the deportation of someone who fears they will be tortured or killed.

Departures board showing cancelled flights. The journey home has been made even harder for Australians by cancelled flights and exorbitant ticket prices. James Gourley/AAP

It is an open question whether the committee would consider interim measures as a means of getting citizens home. If it did, they would apply only to people who could show a risk of irreparable harm, such as separated children, those whose visa is about to expire, those without employment or a place to live, or those who have underlying health concerns or other compassionate reasons for returning.

And Australia could still ignore the committee’s request — although this would be a very bad look on the world stage.

Why it is still worth lodging a complaint

Still, what a case like this could achieve is a detailed elaboration of what the right to return to one’s country actually entails, and the kinds of circumstances in which it can be lawfully restricted.

The committee’s views on these matters would provide a valuable and authoritative contribution to the international human rights jurisprudence[22]. This could have a powerful influence on how countries treat their nationals in the future.

Read more: Can governments mandate a COVID vaccination? Balancing public health with human rights – and what the law says[23]

If Australia was found to have violated its human rights obligations, then the committee’s opinion would also provide some vindication for those who have been stuck abroad.

Unfortunately, for those stranded now, though, it wouldn’t be the golden ticket home.

References

  1. ^ nearly 40,000 (www.abc.net.au)
  2. ^ mounting stories (www.smh.com.au)
  3. ^ desperate to return (edition.cnn.com)
  4. ^ government caps (www.abc.net.au)
  5. ^ transit-country restrictions (www.abc.net.au)
  6. ^ expensive (www.abc.net.au)
  7. ^ cancelled flights (www.theguardian.com)
  8. ^ has suggested (www.abc.net.au)
  9. ^ United Nations Human Rights Committee (www.ohchr.org)
  10. ^ says (tbinternet.ohchr.org)
  11. ^ human rights experts (www.ohchr.org)
  12. ^ individual complaints (www.ohchr.org)
  13. ^ Australians don't have a 'right' to travel. Does COVID mean our days of carefree overseas trips are over? (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ waive (www.ohchr.org)
  15. ^ arbitrarily (tbinternet.ohchr.org)
  16. ^ only justifiable (www.smh.com.au)
  17. ^ tennis players (www.smh.com.au)
  18. ^ Self-entitled prima donnas or do they have a point? Why Australian Open tennis players find hard lockdown so tough (theconversation.com)
  19. ^ Senate inquiry (www.aph.gov.au)
  20. ^ track record (books.google.com.au)
  21. ^ interim measures (papers.ssrn.com)
  22. ^ jurisprudence (www.law.cornell.edu)
  23. ^ Can governments mandate a COVID vaccination? Balancing public health with human rights – and what the law says (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/should-aussies-stranded-overseas-go-to-the-united-nations-for-help-to-get-home-154372

The Times Features

Here's How to Pick the Best Hair Loss Treatment for Your Needs

Hair loss can be frustrating, probably an emotional experience, and only with appropriate types of treatments is one able to restore one's confidence level, showing results that ...

Property Hotspots for Australia in 2025

Introduction As we move into a new era of property investment, understanding the concept of property hotspots becomes essential for investors looking to maximize their returns. ...

INTRO Travel Predicts 2025’s Top Travel Hotspots

They’re Giving Away a Free Trip! As young travellers look ahead to 2025, certain destinations are already emerging as must-visit hotspots. According to INTRO Travel—an Austral...

Vitamin B6 is essential – but too much can be toxic. Here’s what to know to stay safe

In recent weeks, reports have been circulating[1] about severe reactions in people who’ve taken over-the-counter vitamin B6 supplements. Vitamin B6 poisoning can injure nerv...

The Benefits of Solar-Powered Heating and Cooling

As the climate becomes more unpredictable and temperatures continue to rise, staying cool during the hotter months is more important than ever. Traditional air conditioners, wh...

Cool T-Shirts for Men: Trends, Styles, and Must-Haves

People are fond of cool t-shirts for men. These allow the boys to show their personality. Yes, it works like a canvas that men use to do self-expression. Trendy men’s t-shirts ma...

Times Magazine

What to Look for When Booking an Event Space in Melbourne

Define your event needs early to streamline venue selection and ensure a good fit. Choose a well-located, accessible venue with good transport links and parking. Check for key amenities such as catering, AV equipment, and flexible seating. Pla...

How BIM Software is Transforming Architecture and Engineering

Building Information Modeling (BIM) software has become a cornerstone of modern architecture and engineering practices, revolutionizing how professionals design, collaborate, and execute projects. By enabling more efficient workflows and fostering ...

How 32-Inch Computer Monitors Can Increase Your Workflow

With the near-constant usage of technology around the world today, ergonomics have become crucial in business. Moving to 32 inch computer monitors is perhaps one of the best and most valuable improvements you can possibly implement. This-sized moni...

Top Tips for Finding a Great Florist for Your Sydney Wedding

While the choice of wedding venue does much of the heavy lifting when it comes to wowing guests, decorations are certainly not far behind. They can add a bit of personality and flair to the traditional proceedings, as well as enhancing the venue’s ...

Avant Stone's 2025 Nature's Palette Collection

Avant Stone, a longstanding supplier of quality natural stone in Sydney, introduces the 2025 Nature’s Palette Collection. Curated for architects, designers, and homeowners with discerning tastes, this selection highlights classic and contemporary a...

Professional-Grade Tactical Gear: Why 5.11 Tactical Leads the Field

When you're out in the field, your gear has to perform at the same level as you. In the world of high-quality equipment, 5.11 Tactical has established itself as a standard for professionals who demand dependability. Regardless of whether you’re inv...

LayBy Shopping