The Times Australia
The Times News

.

Impeaching Trump a second time is a complex and politically risky act. Here's how it could work

  • Written by Markus Wagner, Associate Professor of Law, University of Wollongong

President Donald Trump is extremely unlikely to capitulate to pressure[1] to resign in the final days of his presidency. And his Cabinet is equally unlikely to force him out[2] by invoking the 25th amendment of the Constitution[3], despite calls from the Democrats[4] to do so.

So, in the wake of last week’s insurrection at the US Capitol[5], which left five people dead and the Trump White House in free fall, the final option available to lawmakers who want to punish the president for his role in encouraging the rioters is impeachment. Again.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said today the Democrats “will proceed[6]” with impeachment proceedings this week if Vice President Mike Pence does not immediately respond to a resolution[7] calling for the Cabinet to invoke the 25th amendment.

This will no doubt be a complicated task in the waning days of the Trump presidency. No US president has faced impeachment twice. And there are many questions about how the process will play out, given Joe Biden will be sworn in as the 46th president of the US in just nine days.

Pelosi says the House 'will proceed' with impeachment. Pelosi says the House ‘will proceed’ with bringing legislation to impeach Trump to the floor this week. J. Scott Applewhite/AP

Impeachment: a two-step process

This is how the impeachment process works under the Constitution. (Trump will be familiar with this since he’s already been through it before[8] on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.)

Impeachment requires both chambers of Congress — the House of Representatives and the Senate — to act. The House has the “sole power of impeachment” for federal officials, and all that is required is a simple majority to initiate proceedings. The House essentially takes on the role of a prosecutor, deciding if the charges warrant impeachment and a trial.

The Senate is where the actual trial takes place. Under the Constitution, the chamber acts like a court, with senators considering evidence given by witnesses or any other form deemed suitable.

Impeachment managers appointed by the House “prosecute” the case before the Senate and the president can mount a defence. The chief justice of the Supreme Court acts as the presiding officer[9].

While these proceedings have many of the trappings of an actual court, it is important to bear in mind that impeachment is a political process.

Under the impeachment clause[10] of the Constitution, a president may be removed from office “on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

This language has been the source of considerable debate, with some legal experts, like Trump’s first impeachment lawyer, Alan Dershowitz, arguing[11] that impeachable offences are limited to actual crimes. Others (correctly) disagree[12].

Read more: Does impeachment need a crime? Not according to framers of the Constitution[13]

Conviction requires two-thirds of senators — a deliberately high threshold to prevent politically motivated impeachments from succeeding. No previous impeachment of a president has ever met this bar: Andrew Johnson (1868)[14], Bill Clinton (1998)[15] and Trump (2019)[16] were all acquitted.

Even though some Republican senators[17] have indicated they would vote in favour of impeachment — or at least be open to it — the number is likely nowhere near enough for conviction.

Trump was acquitted in his first impeachment trial. Trump was acquitted in a Senate trial in his first impeachment along largely party votes. Erik S. Lesser/EPA

Complicating factors: time, shifting majorities and a difficult process

With only days left before Trump leaves office on January 20, time is of the essence. Pelosi has said the Democrats in the House will start the process this week. They have drafted a resolution[18] listing one article of impeachment for “willfully inciting violence against the government of the United States”.

The Constitution does not mandate any particular timeline for the proceedings to take place. Outgoing Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has indicated a Senate trial could not begin before January 19[19], as the Senate is in recess until then.

Moving that date up would require all 100 senators to agree — an unlikely prospect.

Read more: 'Delighting in causing complete chaos': what's behind Trump supporters' brazen storming of the Capitol[20]

But this may not be an obstacle to starting the process. The Constitution is silent on the question[21] of whether a Senate trial can be held after a president has left office[22]. The 1876 impeachment[23] of War Secretary William Belknap for graft after he left office may serve as precedent.

Impeaching Trump a second time is a complex and politically risky act. Here's how it could work William Belknap was impeached by the House but acquitted by the Senate. Library of Congress

So, if the House votes to impeach Trump before January 20, a trial could theoretically happen after that date. The maths also change slightly in the Democrats’ favour on that day. The Democrats will take back control of the Senate[24], albeit on a 50-50 split with incoming Vice President Kamala Harris casting any tie-breaking vote.

Democrats are pushing for impeachment because the Constitution not only allows conviction, but also provides for barring Trump from holding federal office again. This would thwart his ambitions to run for president in 2024 — a prospect not lost on Republicans with the same goal[25].

The Constitution does not stipulate how many senators need to vote in favour of disqualifying an impeached official from holding office again, but the Senate has determined a simple majority[26] would suffice. This tool has also been used sparingly in the past: disqualification has only occurred three times[27], and only for federal judges.

The bigger hurdle, however, is that it still requires Trump to first be convicted of impeachment by a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

Political implications of impeachment

Biden has remained lukewarm at best[28] to suggestions of a Senate trial after January 20. Such proceedings would allow Trump to style himself a political martyr to his followers even more than is already the case.

This would distract from the critical goals Biden has for his first 100 days and beyond[29]: tackling spiralling COVID infection numbers and the country’s lagging vaccination program, providing immediate financial relief to struggling families, rejoining international climate action efforts and repairing the damage done to the fabric of government by the Trump administration[30]. Last, but not least, it would make confirmation of Biden’s Cabinet picks[31] more difficult.

Achieving these goals while Trump sets off the political fireworks he so cherishes is implausible.

Biden says impeachment is for Congress to decide. Biden has said impeachment is for Congress to decide. Susan Walsh/AP

The Democrats have floated the idea of impeaching Trump before January 20, but not sending the article of impeachment to the Senate for trial until weeks later[32] — or even longer — to give Biden a chance to get started on these initiatives. But a distraction is a distraction no matter when it happens.

Democrats would also do well to remember that political fortunes can change. It’s understandable to want to punish Trump for his actions, but rushing into a political trial in the Senate, which Democrats are bound to lose, may have unintended consequences for the future.

Read more: 'America First' is no more, but can president-elect Biden fix the US reputation abroad?[33]

What’s to stop the Republicans from pursuing impeachments of future Democratic leaders they disagree with, even in the face of certain defeat in the Senate? This could poison the political atmosphere even further.

Democrats may also want to consider the fact that Trump could face federal charges for allegedly inciting the violence at the Capitol[34] or state charges for urging Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat to Biden[35].

While this outcome is far from certain, the chances of conviction in a court of law would likely prove to be less toxic politically for both Democrats and Republicans alike.

References

  1. ^ capitulate to pressure (au.news.yahoo.com)
  2. ^ force him out (edition.cnn.com)
  3. ^ 25th amendment of the Constitution (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ calls from the Democrats (www.abc.net.au)
  5. ^ insurrection at the US Capitol (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ will proceed (www.axios.com)
  7. ^ resolution (edition.cnn.com)
  8. ^ already been through it before (www.bbc.com)
  9. ^ presiding officer (www.scotusblog.com)
  10. ^ impeachment clause (constitutioncenter.org)
  11. ^ arguing (edition.cnn.com)
  12. ^ disagree (www.theatlantic.com)
  13. ^ Does impeachment need a crime? Not according to framers of the Constitution (theconversation.com)
  14. ^ Andrew Johnson (1868) (www.senate.gov)
  15. ^ Bill Clinton (1998) (www.history.com)
  16. ^ Trump (2019) (www.nytimes.com)
  17. ^ some Republican senators (edition.cnn.com)
  18. ^ drafted a resolution (edition.cnn.com)
  19. ^ could not begin before January 19 (www.washingtonpost.com)
  20. ^ 'Delighting in causing complete chaos': what's behind Trump supporters' brazen storming of the Capitol (theconversation.com)
  21. ^ silent on the question (www.justsecurity.org)
  22. ^ held after a president has left office (www.nytimes.com)
  23. ^ 1876 impeachment (www.senate.gov)
  24. ^ will take back control of the Senate (www.npr.org)
  25. ^ Republicans with the same goal (www.politico.com)
  26. ^ Senate has determined a simple majority (www.vox.com)
  27. ^ disqualification has only occurred three times (history.house.gov)
  28. ^ remained lukewarm at best (www.pbs.org)
  29. ^ his first 100 days and beyond (www.abc.net.au)
  30. ^ damage done to the fabric of government by the Trump administration (www.justsecurity.org)
  31. ^ Biden’s Cabinet picks (www.npr.org)
  32. ^ until weeks later (www.nytimes.com)
  33. ^ 'America First' is no more, but can president-elect Biden fix the US reputation abroad? (theconversation.com)
  34. ^ allegedly inciting the violence at the Capitol (www.nytimes.com)
  35. ^ to “find” enough votes to overturn his defeat to Biden (www.washingtonpost.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/impeaching-trump-a-second-time-is-a-complex-and-politically-risky-act-heres-how-it-could-work-152965

Times Magazine

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Science Behind Reverse Osmosis and Why It Matters

What is reverse osmosis? Reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification process that removes contaminants by forcing water through a semi-permeable membrane. This membrane allows only water molecules to pass through while blocking impurities such as...

The Times Features

The Role of Your GP in Creating a Chronic Disease Management Plan That Works

Living with a long-term condition, whether that is diabetes, asthma, arthritis or heart disease, means making hundreds of small decisions every day. You plan your diet against m...

Troubleshooting Flickering Lights: A Comprehensive Guide for Homeowners

Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik Effectively addressing flickering lights in your home is more than just a matter of convenience; it's a pivotal aspect of both home safety and en...

My shins hurt after running. Could it be shin splints?

If you’ve started running for the first time, started again after a break, or your workout is more intense, you might have felt it. A dull, nagging ache down your shins after...

Metal Roof Replacement Cost Per Square Metre in 2025: A Comprehensive Guide for Australian Homeowners

In recent years, the trend of installing metal roofs has surged across Australia. With their reputation for being both robust and visually appealing, it's easy to understand thei...

Why You’re Always Adjusting Your Bra — and What to Do Instead

Image by freepik It starts with a gentle tug, then a subtle shift, and before you know it, you're adjusting your bra again — in the middle of work, at dinner, even on the couch. I...

How to Tell If Your Eyes Are Working Harder Than They Should Be

Image by freepik Most of us take our vision for granted—until it starts to let us down. Whether it's squinting at your phone, rubbing your eyes at the end of the day, or feeling ...