The Times Australia
The Times News

.

Does the US have the right to sail warships through the South China Sea? And can China stop them?

  • Written by Claudio Bozzi, Lecturer in Law, Deakin University
Does the US have the right to sail warships through the South China Sea? And can China stop them?

Images of what appeared to be US warships emerged[1] from China last month, but they were not anywhere near an ocean. In fact, they were thousands of kilometres away, in a desert in western China.

Military experts said the mock-ups of US warships were part of a new target range developed by the People’s Liberation Army. The images demonstrate how seriously China is taking the repeated appearances of foreign warships in waters it claims to control – and why this is a worry for the stability of the region.

In late November, a US destroyer sailed[2] through the Taiwan Strait, prompting a warning from China to “stop stirring up trouble, crossing the line and playing with fire”. This followed sailings of naval ships through the strait in recent months by Canada[3], France[4] and the UK[5].

The aircraft carrier USS Carl Vinson, meanwhile, made nine visits[6] to the South China Sea this year, most recently in October when it conducted training exercises[7] with a Japanese helicopter destroyer.

China has been incensed by this uptick in naval activity. Beijing claims the vast majority of the South China Sea as its own and regards self-governing Taiwan as a renegade province.

In a clear demonstration of its own naval capabilities, four People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) vessels conducted military and surveillance operations[8] just 75km (45 miles) off the coast of Alaska in the US exclusive economic zone in late August.

Both nations’ naval operations are fuelling an atmosphere of deep distrust and suspicion. Chinese commentators blame the US for turning the Taiwan Strait into a flashpoint, and characterise US transits in the South China Sea as provocative violations of China’s sovereignty.

And although the passage of the PLAN vessels near Alaska was in compliance with international law, the US is concerned about China’s aims to aggressively expand its naval operations to become the dominant power in the Pacific.

With tensions running high in the Pacific, where does international law come in? What does the law say about sailing vessels in disputed waters, and have China or the US and its allies violated these rules?

Read more: Explainer: why is the South China Sea such a hotly contested region?[9]

The rule of law in the oceans

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea[10] (UNCLOS) establishes the rule of law in the oceans, as well as the rights of both coastal and maritime states.

For example, coastal states have the right to control and manage the resources in their exclusive economic zones (EEZ), which extend 200 nautical miles (370km) from their shores.

At the same time, these zones remain international waters. This means foreign vessels have a right of innocent passage. They must travel on the surface of the water and not threaten the “peace, good order, or security of the coastal state”.

Coastal states may stop foreign ships from passing through their EEZ if they deem it “non-innocent”, but the passage itself cannot be considered a threat.

UNCLOS also specifies which waters fall under a state’s direct sovereign control, otherwise known as its “territorial seas[11]”. This extends at most 12 nautical miles (22km) from a nation’s coast.

Some of the world’s most important waterways, such as the Straits of Malacca[12] between Indonesia and Malaysia and the Taiwan Strait, fall into this category.

Foreign ships still retain the right to pass through these territorial waters, as long as they navigate “continuously and expeditiously[13]”, not stopping or anchoring. Coastal states may not prohibit or impede a vessel’s innocent transit.

Ambiguity being exploited by China

UNCLOS is scattered with undefined and ambiguous terms in an attempt to strike a balance between the competing interests of coastal and maritime states.

This ambiguity raises the risk of clashing interpretations of the law, as well as the potential for nations to exploit it for their own purposes. China, for example, has complained US surveillance in its EEZ is not for “peaceful purposes” – an undefined term under UNCLOS.

Read more: Explainer: what are the legal implications of the South China Sea ruling?[14]

UNCLOS also does not grant sovereignty over the sea in the absolute terms that China claims. Under the convention, the sea is shared by states and no nation can claim absolute dominion over it.

In recent years, China has passed domestic laws that claim to supersede international law. For example, Beijing requires vessels[15] to seek permission before undertaking innocent passage through the South China Sea, which it considers its “territorial waters”.

Chinese vessels in the South China Sea.
Chinese vessels moored at Whitsun Reef in the South China Sea. National Task Force-West Philippine Sea/AP

China also claims historical control[16] over the South China Sea, which is also not clearly defined under UNCLOS. Historical control over waters has been recognised under international law, but this requires a state to have had continuous authority over a sea, with the acquiescence of other nations.

China’s claim to historical control over the South China Sea has been dismissed[17] by an international tribunal[18] and vigorously protested by its neighbours, as well as other nations without claims to the waters.

US belief in freedom of navigation

The US maintains its passages through the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea are within its rights under UNCLOS, even though it is not a signatory. (It believes the convention contains pre-existing customary rights, such as the freedom of navigation, which all nations have always enjoyed.)

To maintain these rights, Washington has maintained a Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) program[19] since the late 1970s. The purpose of these operations is to ensure all nations retain their unrestricted sea transit rights as spelled out under UNCLOS.

Read more: China does not want war, at least not yet. It's playing the long game[20]

As such, FONOPS send an overt message – the US has the right to sail its warships through the South China Sea because UNCLOS permits it. There must be no ambiguity under the convention when it comes to this.

China claims FONOPS are a mask for unwarranted aggression and regional interference. Beijing’s opposition is not surprising – the program contests the legality of both China’s sea claims and its attempts to restrict navigational freedom through these waters.

China has no legal grounds for dismissing these international rules. However, the longer it does, the more likely the tensions in the South China Sea and Taiwan Strait are going to intensify.

References

  1. ^ emerged (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ sailed (www.aljazeera.com)
  3. ^ Canada (www.reuters.com)
  4. ^ France (www.taiwannews.com.tw)
  5. ^ the UK (www.theguardian.com)
  6. ^ made nine visits (www.scmp.com)
  7. ^ conducted training exercises (www.navytimes.com)
  8. ^ conducted military and surveillance operations (www.alaskapublic.org)
  9. ^ Explainer: why is the South China Sea such a hotly contested region? (theconversation.com)
  10. ^ United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (www.un.org)
  11. ^ territorial seas (en.wikipedia.org)
  12. ^ Straits of Malacca (www.tandfonline.com)
  13. ^ continuously and expeditiously (www.maritime-executive.com)
  14. ^ Explainer: what are the legal implications of the South China Sea ruling? (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ requires vessels (www.lowyinstitute.org)
  16. ^ historical control (www.lowyinstitute.org)
  17. ^ dismissed (www.lowyinstitute.org)
  18. ^ international tribunal (www.theguardian.com)
  19. ^ Freedom of Navigation Operations (FONOPS) program (interactives.lowyinstitute.org)
  20. ^ China does not want war, at least not yet. It's playing the long game (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/does-the-us-have-the-right-to-sail-warships-through-the-south-china-sea-and-can-china-stop-them-166742

Times Magazine

DIY Is In: How Aussie Parents Are Redefining Birthday Parties

When planning his daughter’s birthday, Rich opted for a DIY approach, inspired by her love for drawing maps and giving clues. Their weekend tradition of hiding treats at home sparked the idea, and with a pirate ship playground already chosen as t...

When Touchscreens Turn Temperamental: What to Do Before You Panic

When your touchscreen starts acting up, ignoring taps, registering phantom touches, or freezing entirely, it can feel like your entire setup is falling apart. Before you rush to replace the device, it’s worth taking a deep breath and exploring what c...

Why Social Media Marketing Matters for Businesses in Australia

Today social media is a big part of daily life. All over Australia people use Facebook, Instagram, TikTok , LinkedIn and Twitter to stay connected, share updates and find new ideas. For businesses this means a great chance to reach new customers and...

Building an AI-First Culture in Your Company

AI isn't just something to think about anymore - it's becoming part of how we live and work, whether we like it or not. At the office, it definitely helps us move faster. But here's the thing: just using tools like ChatGPT or plugging AI into your wo...

Data Management Isn't Just About Tech—Here’s Why It’s a Human Problem Too

Photo by Kevin Kuby Manuel O. Diaz Jr.We live in a world drowning in data. Every click, swipe, medical scan, and financial transaction generates information, so much that managing it all has become one of the biggest challenges of our digital age. Bu...

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Times Features

How to Choose a Cosmetic Clinic That Aligns With Your Aesthetic Goals

Clinics that align with your goals prioritise subtlety, safety, and client input Strong results come from experience, not trends or treatment bundles A proper consultation fe...

7 Non-Invasive Options That Can Subtly Enhance Your Features

Non-invasive treatments can refresh your appearance with minimal downtime Options range from anti-wrinkle treatments to advanced skin therapies Many results appear gradually ...

What is creatine? What does the science say about its claims to build muscle and boost brain health?

If you’ve walked down the wellness aisle at your local supermarket recently, or scrolled the latest wellness trends on social media, you’ve likely heard about creatine. Creati...

Whole House Water Filters: Essential or Optional for Australian Homes?

Access to clean, safe water is something most Australians take for granted—but the reality can be more complex. Our country’s unique climate, frequent droughts, and occasional ...

How Businesses Turn Data into Actionable Insights

In today's digital landscape, businesses are drowning in data yet thirsting for meaningful direction. The challenge isn't collecting information—it's knowing how to turn data i...

Why Mobile Allied Therapy Services Are Essential in Post-Hospital Recovery

Mobile allied health services matter more than ever under recent NDIA travel funding cuts. A quiet but critical shift is unfolding in Australia’s healthcare landscape. Mobile all...