The Times Australia
Business and Money
The Times Real Estate

.

Under 'open skies', the market, not the minister, would decide how often airlines could fly into Australia

  • Written by Ian Douglas, Honorary Senior Lecturer, UNSW Aviation and Fellow of the University of Wollongong, UNSW Sydney
Under 'open skies', the market, not the minister, would decide how often airlines could fly into Australia

Federal Transport Minister Catherine King has offered several explanations[1] for the decision to deny the Qatari government’s request to fly extra flights into Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth.

None of them amounts to a clear rationale for the decision, which has been criticised by airlines[2], airports[3], tourism bodies[4] consumer advocates[5] and state governments[6].

The big question is why such decisions are even up to the minister, rather than being left to the market.

It stems from an outdated international treaty on commercial aviation, from a time when national security was the prime concern. There is, however, a workaround, which other nations have been using, known as open-skies agreements.

Read more: Grattan on Friday: Transport Minister Catherine King struggles to find a landing strip amid Qatar turbulence[7]

An outdated convention

King’s right to rule on international flights is based on the Convention on International Civil Aviation[8], signed in December 1944 in Chicago – and hence known as the Chicago Convention.

Representatives from 54 nations attended the convention. All agreed they should have sovereignty over the airspace above their territory. The resulting framework prohibited international commercial flights unless expressly permitted. Thus, for an airline to fly internationally there must first be a government-level agreement to permit it.

For example, no Australian airline can operate scheduled commercial services or even sell codeshare flights to the Maldives, because Australia has no air service agreement with the South Asian archipelago.

While the level of demand today may not justify direct services, the framework effectively ensures there never will be that demand.

Turning to open-skies deals

Changing this bilateral-treaty system has proven difficult. Many countries have, since the 1990s, taken the next best approach: open-skies agreements.

An open-skies agreement is a deal between two or more nations that allows for unlimited commercial services without the need for explicit ministerial approval.

Nations can still intervene, so sovereignty is preserved, and intervention is typically limited to safety and security grounds.

The United States has open-skies agreements with more than 100 nations, including the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Singapore has open-skies agreements with more than 60 nations. Canada has open-skies agreements with 23 nations.

The US, Singapore and New Zealand are parties to an eight-nation multilateral open-skies agreement (the Multilateral Agreement on the Liberalization of International Air Transportation[9]), which does not include Australia.

Australia has open-skies agreements with just seven nations: China, India, Japan, New Zealand, Singapore (which is why Singapore Airlines is expanding services to Australia[10] without controversy), the US and the United Kingdom. This makes Australia a relative outlier among developed nations.

The federal government’s Aviation Green Paper 2023[11] spends only 2 of 224 pages discussing international aviation competition. It proposes no change in approach.

Woman gives speech in front of airport departure signs
Federal Transport Minister Catherine King has offered a range of reasons for denying Qatar Airways’ expansion of its Australian flights. Lukas Coch/AAP

Redundant rationale

Because Australia is separated by great distances from major population centres, governments historically wanted to ensure Australia had air services that were secure, reliable and economically viable.

However, aviation has moved on. The emergence of major hubs, first in South-East Asia, then in the Middle East, altered the structure of international aviation.

Treaties that Australia negotiated long ago have become redundant. Direct flights by Australian or European airlines are largely uncompetitive against midpoint hubs, where the carriers connect more than 50 cities in Europe to Australian gateways.

Non-stop flights to other regions are now widely available, and are offered by an increasing number of airlines from various countries. There is enough redundancy in the system that if one or more airlines stopped serving Australia, the security and reliability of air services would still be maintained.

Read more: What will putting the interests of Qantas ahead of Qatar Airways cost? $1 billion per year and a new wave of protectionism of legacy carriers[12]

Open skies in Australia’s national interest

Australia would experience a net benefit from more international flights. As an island nation, aviation is essential for two of our largest export industries: education and tourism. The persistence of demand for air travel despite record high fares illustrates this.

Australian carriers have not flagged meaningful international service expansion beyond pre-COVID levels. Indeed, they have consistently neglected to use existing traffic rights to major markets such as Malaysia. The introduction of low-cost services, such as 67 weekly flights by the Air Asia group, from such markets has demonstrated that new air services stimulate new demand and do not necessarily harm incumbent operators AirAsia Xpanding Services To China And Australia[13].

Protecting a stagnant Australian-based international operation is unnecessary and even harmful to the broader economy.

It’s also in Australia’s national interest to ensure adherence to international obligations and adoption of values that Australia promotes. As a nation that has long espoused liberal economic values, it’s in Australia’s interest to commit to healthy competition in the aviation industry and reduce arbitrary decision-making.

Read more: Grattan: Albanese's government has questions to answer on competition[14]

A key obligation of signatories to the Chicago Convention is to ensure civil aviation is used for purposes consistent with the convention’s aims. One aim is that “international air transport services may be established on the basis of equality of opportunity”.

Protecting the profit of Australian airlines, when no such reason has been cited in other similar cases, risks breaching this obligation. The inability of Australia’s transport minister to provide a clear rationale for the decision is precisely why the decision is best left to the market.

Authors: Ian Douglas, Honorary Senior Lecturer, UNSW Aviation and Fellow of the University of Wollongong, UNSW Sydney

Read more https://theconversation.com/under-open-skies-the-market-not-the-minister-would-decide-how-often-airlines-could-fly-into-australia-213214

SME Business News

Launchd Acquires ICMI in Bold Play to Redefine the Business of Speakers and Influence

Australia’s leading speaker bureau acquired by next-gen talent and technology Company, modernising the brand, corporate and event industry April 2025 - Launchd, the business underpinned by a...

Why Your Dental Business Needs Professional Digital Marketing Services

Running a successful dental practice today requires more than just great patient care. In a digital-first world, your online presence plays a huge role in how potential patients discover, choos...

Brand Storytelling: How Video Marketing Can Enhance Your Brand Identity

In the competitive landscape of 2025, building a strong and recognisable brand identity is crucial for standing out in the marketplace. One of the most effective ways to shape and communicate y...

Future-Proofing Your Business with Strategic Defence Insight

In an era marked by rapid technological change, global uncertainty, and evolving security risks, the need for long-term resilience in business has never been greater. Organisations across indu...

The Times Features

How weight stigma in maternity care harms larger-bodied women and their babies

According to a study from the United States[1], women experience weight stigma in maternity care at almost every visit. We expect this experience to be similar in Australia, ...

10 Ways to Make Money Online and Provide Financial Stability

The possibility of earning money online has reached unprecedented heights. The proper strategy enables anyone to begin earning money. You don't need fancy degrees or special skil...

The Power of Exterior Design: How Facades Influence Property Value

First impressions count when it comes to real estate, and nothing quite sets the tone for a property like its exterior design. A building's facade is more than just an aesthetic ...

The Best Adjustable Bed and Mattress Packages for Comfort

The appropriate bed and mattress are essential for establishing the perfect sleep environment. If you seek a way to upgrade your sleep experience, adjustable bed and mattress pac...

Designing a Modern Home: Features That Will Make Your Dream House Stand Out

Designing your dream home is an exciting journey, and for many, it’s an opportunity to create a space that reflects their personal style, functionality needs, and modern trends. ...

Client Dinners Done Right: Tips for Meaningful Engagement

Client dinners offer more than just a meal—they’re an opportunity to build lasting business relationships in a more personal and relaxed setting. Done well, these dinners can str...

Business Times

Launchd Acquires ICMI in Bold Play to Redefine the Business of Sp…

Australia’s leading speaker bureau acquired by next-gen talent and technology Company, modernising the brand, corporate a...

Why Your Dental Business Needs Professional Digital Marketing Ser…

Running a successful dental practice today requires more than just great patient care. In a digital-first world, your onlin...

Brand Storytelling: How Video Marketing Can Enhance Your Brand Id…

In the competitive landscape of 2025, building a strong and recognisable brand identity is crucial for standing out in the ...

LayBy Shopping