The Times Australia
The Times Australia

.

Do parties win elections because of their leaders, or in spite of them? History shows it’s a bit of both

  • Written by Pandanus Petter, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Politics and International Relations, Australian National University



The upcoming federal election will see the incumbent Labor prime minister, Anthony Albanese, face off against Liberal opposition leader, Peter Dutton. We’ll likely see a strong focus on the personal qualities and performance of the two leaders.

We tend to think a popular leader can win an election for their party while an unpopular one can lose it. Much of the commentary[1] on the Coalition’s 2022 election loss, for example, centred on the widespread dislike of Scott Morrison.

But how much do party leaders actually affect their party’s vote share, and ultimately, the outcome of an election? We looked at 40 years of opinion polling to find out.

Our research

Opinion polls in Australia have been conducted since the 1940s, but it was not until the 1980s that they began to regularly ask questions about leader satisfaction and voting intention. In recent decades, the proliferation of polls has seen a greater consistency in question wording and protocols.

We have been analysing[2] the polling data on government popularity and responsiveness in Australia. This enables us to track and compare leaders over an extended period.

We’ve crunched the numbers on voter intention and leader satisfaction from September 1985 until December 2024.

We can cross-reference these statistics to show which prime ministers and opposition leaders were a net benefit to their party (more popular than their party overall) and which were a net drag (less popular than their party).

Prime ministers: who helped and who hindered?

By this measure, the prime minister who provided the most electoral benefit to their party was Kevin Rudd between 2007 and 2010.

Rudd achieved some of the highest levels of voter satisfaction recorded since the early Bob Hawke years, averaging 60% satisfaction, a 14-point net benefit for his party.

His popularity declined considerably just before his replacement by Julia Gillard in 2010, and never fully recovered when he became prime minister again in 2013.

John Howard ranks second, with Morrison and Albanese (so far) sharing third place in terms of satisfaction. However, there’s a larger difference between Albanese’s personal popularity and his party’s vote intention.

Morrison’s tenure in office was skewed by the COVID pandemic, which saw a “rally around the flag” effect, seeing a spike in voters’ trust in government[3].

Paul Keating comes at the bottom of the list. His personal popularity trailed his party’s by eight percentage points on average, with an upset victory in 1993 not enough to win over the public to defeat a resurgent Howard in 1996.

Similiarly, Tony Abbott, although party leader when the Coalition returned to power after the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd years, was consistently less popular than his party – by seven points in opposition and four as prime minister.

What about opposition leaders?

Among opposition leaders, Rudd again tops the list. He was more popular than Labor overall in the year prior to winning the election in December 2007, peaking at 65.5% satisfaction.

Mark Latham comes in second, perhaps surprisingly. This is due, at least in part, to the unpopularity of the Coalition government[4] at the time.

The opposition leader who represents the greatest drag on their party was Andrew Peacock[5] in the late 1980s, in what was his second incarnation as Liberal leader.

Overall, prime ministers have a greater impact on their party’s fortunes than opposition leaders. This is expected as incumbency has advantages, with prime ministers usually given more opportunity for media attention, greater recognition with the public, and hopefully a record of achievements in government to point to.

Prime ministers register a net gain to their party of about four percentage points, compared with minus three points for opposition leaders.

Labor leaders show a net gain to their party of two points, compared to minus four points for their Liberal counterparts.

The personalisation of politics

Since at least the 1970s, political leaders have attracted increasing attention in democratic elections around the world.

This trend has not been restricted to countries with presidential systems, such as the United States. It’s also[6] playing out in parliamentary systems such as Australia’s and the United Kingdom’s. This is despite the fact voters elect local members to parliament, rather than voting for the prime minister directly.

Read more: Strong political leaders are electoral gold – but the trick is in them knowing when to stand down[7]

This profound shift in democratic politics has been based on several social changes.

First, the rise of television, and more recently social media, has provided the visual images that direct voters’ attention towards the leader.

While television’s heyday has passed – in both the 2019 and 2022 elections, the Australian Election Study[8] surveys show more people followed the election on the internet than on television – visual images of the leaders dominate the media, both traditional and social.

Second, party de-alignment has seen voters moving away from their traditional party loyalties, with the personalities of the leaders filling this gap.

In the 1960s, around one in ten voters said they did not identify with a party, compared with one in four in the 2022 election[9].

Third, the unprecedented expansion in university education has produced critical voters[10] who are more volatile in their voting than any groups in the past.

One factor that can sway their vote[11] is policies, but another is the leader they find most competent.

What does this mean for the next election?

For Australian voters, leaders matter, rightly or wrongly, for evaluating the performance of a government and choosing which party to vote for.

As we close in on an election in 2025, voters will be looking to Albanese and Dutton. In the chart below, we can see that while on average Dutton has been only marginally beneficial for his party compared with Albanese, this gap has narrowed in the latter half of 2024.

Although Albanese started at a historically very strong position, it appears his popularity began to decline in May 2023. The defeat of the Voice to Parliament Referendum[12] in November sped up the decline.

Dutton received a short-term boost after the result, after which his popularity declined and then has steadily built over time. Current projections indicate the next election will likely be close-run.

It also appears the two current leaders, whatever their other merits, have fallen short of the levels reached by the most popular prime ministers and opposition leaders of the past.

Albanese’s early popularity has waned, while the Coalition and Dutton’s fortunes rise in step with one another.

This reflects a return to a normal vote share for the party after their loss in 2022[13]. While it may prove problematic for the government, it doesn’t necessarily indicate a meteoric increase in Dutton’s personal popularity.

References

  1. ^ commentary (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ analysing (cass.anu.edu.au)
  3. ^ trust in government (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ unpopularity of the Coalition government (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ Andrew Peacock (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ also (www.oxfordbibliographies.com)
  7. ^ Strong political leaders are electoral gold – but the trick is in them knowing when to stand down (theconversation.com)
  8. ^ Australian Election Study (australianelectionstudy.org)
  9. ^ 2022 election (australianelectionstudy.org)
  10. ^ critical voters (www.cambridge.org)
  11. ^ sway their vote (unsw.press)
  12. ^ Voice to Parliament Referendum (theconversation.com)
  13. ^ in 2022 (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/do-parties-win-elections-because-of-their-leaders-or-in-spite-of-them-history-shows-its-a-bit-of-both-248868

Temu’s Local Seller Program opens fully in Australia

Local businesses of all sizes across Australia now have a new, low-cost channel to reach millions of online sh...

Times Magazine

Building an AI-First Culture in Your Company

AI isn't just something to think about anymore - it's becoming part of how we live and work, whether we like it or not. At the office, it definitely helps us move faster. But here's the thing: just using tools like ChatGPT or plugging AI into your wo...

Data Management Isn't Just About Tech—Here’s Why It’s a Human Problem Too

Photo by Kevin Kuby Manuel O. Diaz Jr.We live in a world drowning in data. Every click, swipe, medical scan, and financial transaction generates information, so much that managing it all has become one of the biggest challenges of our digital age. Bu...

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

The Times Features

Is our mental health determined by where we live – or is it the other way round? New research sheds more light

Ever felt like where you live is having an impact on your mental health? Turns out, you’re not imagining things. Our new analysis[1] of eight years of data from the New Zeal...

Going Off the Beaten Path? Here's How to Power Up Without the Grid

There’s something incredibly freeing about heading off the beaten path. No traffic, no crowded campsites, no glowing screens in every direction — just you, the landscape, and the...

West HQ is bringing in a season of culinary celebration this July

Western Sydney’s leading entertainment and lifestyle precinct is bringing the fire this July and not just in the kitchen. From $29 lobster feasts and award-winning Asian banque...

What Endo Took and What It Gave Me

From pain to purpose: how one woman turned endometriosis into a movement After years of misdiagnosis, hormone chaos, and major surgery, Jo Barry was done being dismissed. What beg...

Why Parents Must Break the Silence on Money and Start Teaching Financial Skills at Home

Australia’s financial literacy rates are in decline, and our kids are paying the price. Certified Money Coach and Financial Educator Sandra McGuire, who has over 20 years’ exp...

Australia’s Grill’d Transforms Operations with Qlik

Boosting Burgers and Business Clean, connected data powers real-time insights, smarter staffing, and standout customer experiences Sydney, Australia, 14 July 2025 – Qlik®, a g...