The Times Australia
The Times Australia

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Banning under-16s from social media may be unconstitutional – and ripe for High Court challenge

  • Written by Sarah Joseph, Professor of Human Rights Law, Griffith University

On November 21 2024, the Albanese government unveiled its bill[1] to introduce a minimum age of 16 for most social media platforms. The government claims the bill is necessary to protect children from social harm[2].

But it might violate the implied freedom of political communication (IFPC) in the Constitution if it is passed. If so, it will be invalid.

Children, politics, and media

Children are not apolitical. Significant “underage” political activists include Greta Thunberg[3], the Schools Strike 4 Climate[4] movement, and the local Channel 6 news channel[5], founded by Leo Puglisi when he was 12.

Some of the most compelling footage of the Amsterdam soccer riots[6] involving Maccabi Tel Aviv supporters came from a 13-year-old journalist known as Bender. And children do not need to be activists to be politically engaged: a person’s political consciousness and identity often starts to evolve in childhood.

Social media is a crucial source of political information and communication[7] for children. They pay comparatively little attention to legacy media sources such as newspapers or television news. Furthermore, legacy media rarely publishes content from children, unlike social media. The interactivity of the latter allows for conversation, debate and galvanisation that is simply not replicated in the former.

What is the implied freedom of political communication?

The IFPC applies where a legal “burden” is placed on political communication, which is defined as communications on matters that might affect a person’s federal vote, their opinion of the federal government, and constitutional referendums. That definition from Lange v ABC[8] (1997) has since been interpreted to encompass communication about virtually any topic that can be viewed as political.

A “burden” arises where the “flow” of political communication is disrupted, which includes a legal disincentive to communicate openly.

In the first Unions NSW case (2013)[9], restrictions on political donations from non-voters, namely corporations and trade unions, were found to breach the IFPC[10]. Restrictions on political donations and expenditure would reduce the political information available to voters and others.

The proposed ban would disrupt the flow of political communication to and from children. Unlike corporations and trade unions, children are future voters. Their later political choices are often influenced by views developed while they are children. Furthermore, the minimum age requirement will deprive us all of children’s political voices on social media.

The IFPC is not absolute. Once a burden on political communication is established, the High Court will then apply a test of proportionality to establish whether the law is nevertheless constitutional. Almost all IFPC cases have turned on this issue of proportionality.

So the government would first have to establish whether the impugned law has a purpose that is compatible with Australia’s system of representative government. The purpose of protecting children would satisfy this step.

There is then a three-step test to establish proportionality. First, is the law suitable for achieving its purpose? Laws fail this test if they lack a rational connection to the purpose. Here, a social media minimum age might be suitable if there is good evidence that social media harms children.

However, we do not yet know how the minimum age requirement will be practically implemented, in particular how social media platforms will verify the age of users. The ban will not be “suitable” if it is unworkable or easy to thwart.

Furthermore, there are views[11] that a ban could harm children and breach their human rights[12]. For example, social media might give some children access to online communities that alleviate feelings of isolation and alienation. If a ban significantly harms children, it is not a suitable or rational way to protect them.

Second, is the ban is necessary for achieving the purpose? Or are there other ways of achieving the purpose that might impose a lesser burden on political communication?

Notably, a parliamentary inquiry[13], which tabled its report on the impact of social media on Australian society on November 17, did not recommend a ban. Instead, it favoured the imposition of a duty of care[14] for online platforms to take steps to prevent harm to users. Parliament’s own investigation concluded that less drastic means might suffice to protect children, which indicates the minimum age requirement might fail the test of necessity.

Third, the extent of the impact on political communication is weighed against the importance of the purpose of reducing harm to children. The potential impact on the flow of political communication is massive, given a huge age group will be excluded from using most social media, so that side of the equation should carry considerable weight in any “balancing” exercise.

The bill, if passed, is arguably vulnerable to failing all three steps of the proportionality analysis. It only needs to fail one to be invalid.

A bill that is ripe for constitutional challenge

The IFPC has been one of the most litigated aspects of the Constitution in the past three decades. The vast majority of impugned laws have survived challenge because they have been found to pass the test of proportionality.

Yet this bill seeks to cut a giant swathe of political communication out of existence in Australia. It could feasibly be a rare example of a law that disrupts political communication to such an extent that it is invalid. Social media companies will surely mount a constitutional challenge to find out.

References

  1. ^ bill (minister.infrastructure.gov.au)
  2. ^ protect children from social harm (www.pm.gov.au)
  3. ^ Greta Thunberg (www.theguardian.com)
  4. ^ Schools Strike 4 Climate (www.theguardian.com)
  5. ^ local Channel 6 news channel (www.6newsau.com)
  6. ^ Amsterdam soccer riots (www.youtube.com)
  7. ^ source of political information and communication (journals.sagepub.com)
  8. ^ Lange v ABC (jade.io)
  9. ^ first Unions NSW case (2013) (www.austlii.edu.au)
  10. ^ breach the IFPC (theconversation.com)
  11. ^ views (au.reset.tech)
  12. ^ human rights (humanrights.gov.au)
  13. ^ parliamentary inquiry (www.aph.gov.au)
  14. ^ imposition of a duty of care (www.theguardian.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/banning-under-16s-from-social-media-may-be-unconstitutional-and-ripe-for-high-court-challenge-244282

Victoria’s planning reforms could help solve the housing crisis. But they are under threat

The federal election campaign was dominated by the housing crisis. But the real power to solve it rests with...

The Times Features

AJE Resort ‘26 — “IMPRESSION”

Photographed by Cesar Ocampo | AFW 2025 Day 3, Barangaroo Pier Pavilion There are runways, and then there are moments. Aje’s Resort ‘26 collection, IMPRESSION, wasn’t just a fashi...

Miimi & Jiinda: Weaving Culture, Connection, and Country into Every Thread

By Cesar Ocampo When I sat down with Melissa Greenwood and her mother, Lauren Jarrett—founders of the First Nations brand Miimi & Jiinda—I knew this wasn’t going to be your st...

American Express to Provide $3.95M in Support for Restaurants Worldwide with 2025 “Backing Small” Grant Programs

Sydney, Australia 14 May 2025 – Applications are now open to small business owners who qualify for one  of American Express’ signature grant programs in 2025: Backing Internati...

FARAGE Summer '26 Brings Back the Power Suit — with Edge

Words & Photography by Cesar Ocampo On Day 2 of Australian Fashion Week, I stepped into the FARAGE Summer ’26 runway show not quite knowing what to expect—but walked away thin...

BEARE PARK Pre-Fall 2025 at Australian Fashion Week

Words & Photography by Cesar Ocampo There’s something about BEARE PARK that instantly pulls you in—not with noise, but with a kind of quiet confidence. On Day 2 of Australian ...

Understanding Structured Insurance for Multi-Unit Buildings with Shared Ownership and Common Spaces

When multiple individuals share walls, rooftops, and responsibility for communal spaces, the web of accountability becomes more intricate than it first appears. Beyond the bricks...

Times Magazine

Senior of the Year Nominations Open

The Allan Labor Government is encouraging all Victorians to recognise the valuable contributions of older members of our community by nominating them for the 2025 Victorian Senior of the Year Awards.  Minister for Ageing Ingrid Stitt today annou...

CNC Machining Meets Stage Design - Black Swan State Theatre Company & Tommotek

When artistry meets precision engineering, incredible things happen. That’s exactly what unfolded when Tommotek worked alongside the Black Swan State Theatre Company on several of their innovative stage productions. With tight deadlines and intrica...

Uniden Baby Video Monitor Review

Uniden has released another award-winning product as part of their ‘Baby Watch’ series. The BW4501 Baby Monitor is an easy to use camera for keeping eyes and ears on your little one. The camera is easy to set up and can be mounted to the wall or a...

Top Benefits of Hiring Commercial Electricians for Your Business

When it comes to business success, there are no two ways about it: qualified professionals are critical. While many specialists are needed, commercial electricians are among the most important to have on hand. They are directly involved in upholdin...

The Essential Guide to Transforming Office Spaces for Maximum Efficiency

Why Office Fitouts MatterA well-designed office can make all the difference in productivity, employee satisfaction, and client impressions. Businesses of all sizes are investing in updated office spaces to create environments that foster collaborat...

The A/B Testing Revolution: How AI Optimized Landing Pages Without Human Input

A/B testing was always integral to the web-based marketing world. Was there a button that converted better? Marketing could pit one against the other and see which option worked better. This was always through human observation, and over time, as d...

LayBy Shopping