Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media Advertising

Safety net policies are helping reduce the number of Americans below the poverty line – but that's not the whole story

  • Written by: Elena Delavega, Associate Professor of Social Work, University of Memphis
Safety net policies are helping reduce the number of Americans below the poverty line – but that's not the whole story CC BY-ND[1] The share of Americans living in poverty shrank to an estimated 9.2% in 2020, according to the Urban Institute[2], a think tank that closely tracks this rate with a widely used model[3]. There were 29.3 million Americans living below the poverty line[4], the institute’s researchers found. Another 10.3 million appear to have been kept out of poverty through government efforts to cushion the blows from massive economic upheaval triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic[5]. This new estimate contradicts many[6] prior predictions[7] and is significantly lower than the 10.5% of the U.S. population[8] the U.S. Census Bureau said was in poverty in 2019, the most recent official data available. If confirmed when the government agency releases official 2020 numbers in September[9], it would signal that that the coronavirus didn’t interrupt a gradual decline in poverty[10]. The rate has been falling since 2010, when it stood at 15.1%. It makes sense if you find this news surprising. There were massive job losses when coronavirus-related lockdowns began in 2020[11], particularly among workers without a college degree, who typically earn lower incomes[12]. And as of July 2021, the U.S. jobless rate was 5.4%, well above the 3.5% rate seen in February 2020[13]. Poverty declined even though fewer people were employed[14] because the government stepped up, strengthening the safety net. It halted evictions[15], gave workers who lost their jobs larger unemployment benefits[16], bolstered the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program[17] and adopted other policies to assist people facing economic hardship. Notably, the Internal Revenue Service began to distribute a series of COVID-19 relief and stimulus payments[18] to all but the wealthiest Americans. Not so straightforward While on the surface this appears to be good news, as a scholar who researches poverty[19], I believe the situation is much more complex than it appears. First, the way the government measures poverty[20] is outdated[21]. It does adjust the poverty line for inflation, but poverty today looks very different[22] from what it was like back when statistician Mollie Orshansky[23] based the government’s initial poverty calculation in the early 1960s on 1950s data that suggested people spend one-third of their budget on food. She was figuring out not how much money people needed to thrive, but rather the point below which people would starve. Nor was she trying to devise an indicator to be used in policymaking[24]. There were issues with this formula [25] from the beginning. For one thing, food prices vary from place to place, causing regional differences in how much it costs to put food on the table. For another, families differ in terms of what they need to eat. Many researchers have found[26] that any family of four living on less than about twice the poverty threshold, which stood at $25,750 in 2019[27], would have trouble making ends meet. The Census Bureau itself calculates a Supplemental Poverty Measure[28], which finds somewhat more people living in poverty than through its original method. The Department of Health and Human Services sets its own federal poverty guidelines[29], which are about the same as the official poverty thresholds. Eligibility for SNAP and other benefits for low-income people[30] is often pegged well above this minimum. Food insecurity grew Another reason to not get too excited about a lower 2020 poverty rate is that the share of Americans experiencing food insecurity[31], meaning that they couldn’t get enough of the food needed for a balanced diet, rose to an estimated 13.9% in 2020 from 10.9% in 2019[32]. This increase could be unrelated to income. Many people had new transportation challenges[33], and numerous families had a hard time replacing the food their children would ordinarily consume at school[34], despite government efforts to avoid that problem[35]. It could also indicate that many people scrimped on food to meet other basic needs. [Over 100,000 readers rely on The Conversation’s newsletter to understand the world. Sign up today[36].] That’s because more low-income Americans[37] get assistance through a food bank[38] or food pantry as opposed to programs that help them pay their rent[39] or keep up with their car loans[40]. This discrepancy is another reason I believe the government needs to improve how it measures poverty. Something doesn’t add up when there are more Americans who cannot get enough of the food they need than there are living below the poverty line.

References

  1. ^ CC BY-ND (creativecommons.org)
  2. ^ the Urban Institute (www.urban.org)
  3. ^ widely used model (www.cbpp.org)
  4. ^ below the poverty line (aspe.hhs.gov)
  5. ^ massive economic upheaval triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic (theconversation.com)
  6. ^ contradicts many (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ prior predictions (www.washingtonpost.com)
  8. ^ 10.5% of the U.S. population (www.census.gov)
  9. ^ releases official 2020 numbers in September (www.census.gov)
  10. ^ gradual decline in poverty (www.census.gov)
  11. ^ massive job losses when coronavirus-related lockdowns began in 2020 (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ earn lower incomes (tracktherecovery.org)
  13. ^ well above the 3.5% rate seen in February 2020 (www.bls.gov)
  14. ^ fewer people were employed (www.bls.gov)
  15. ^ halted evictions (www.aarp.org)
  16. ^ larger unemployment benefits (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ bolstered the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (theconversation.com)
  18. ^ COVID-19 relief and stimulus payments (www.irs.gov)
  19. ^ as a scholar who researches poverty (scholar.google.com)
  20. ^ the government measures poverty (www.brookings.edu)
  21. ^ outdated (theconversation.com)
  22. ^ poverty today looks very different (theconversation.com)
  23. ^ Mollie Orshansky (www.ssa.gov)
  24. ^ indicator to be used in policymaking (www.nytimes.com)
  25. ^ issues with this formula (www.jstor.org)
  26. ^ researchers have found (www.childtrends.org)
  27. ^ twice the poverty threshold, which stood at $25,750 in 2019 (doi.org)
  28. ^ Supplemental Poverty Measure (www.census.gov)
  29. ^ federal poverty guidelines (aspe.hhs.gov)
  30. ^ Eligibility for SNAP and other benefits for low-income people (www.thebalance.com)
  31. ^ food insecurity (theconversation.com)
  32. ^ 13.9% in 2020 from 10.9% in 2019 (theconversation.com)
  33. ^ transportation challenges (doi.org)
  34. ^ food their children would ordinarily consume at school (www.npr.org)
  35. ^ government efforts to avoid that problem (frac.org)
  36. ^ Sign up today (theconversation.com)
  37. ^ more low-income Americans (www.consumerreports.org)
  38. ^ food bank (theconversation.com)
  39. ^ pay their rent (www.cbpp.org)
  40. ^ car loans (apnews.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/safety-net-policies-are-helping-reduce-the-number-of-americans-below-the-poverty-line-but-thats-not-the-whole-story-166012

Times Magazine

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the Dogs (Literally)

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

AI Guilt: It’s Real — But it is irrational

Artificial intelligence is rapidly becoming one of the most powerful tools ever made available to ...

Australians Are Keeping Their Cars Longer — And It’s Changing The Market

Australia’s car market is undergoing a subtle but important transformation. People are keeping th...

Streaming Fatigue: Australians Overwhelmed By Subscriptions

Streaming was once supposed to simplify entertainment. Instead, many Australians now feel overwhe...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...

Harry And Meghan: Less Powerful As Royals, More Powerful As Content

For all the claims of “Harry and Meghan fatigue”, the world’s media still cannot stop talking abou...

The Times Features

Residential HVAC Systems in Australia: What Homeowners …

Australia’s residential HVAC market is evolving rapidly as households face hotter summers, rising ...

The Biden Administration: Did The Inquiry Establish Who…

Questions surrounding former US President Joe Biden and his health while in office continue to dom...

Nationals move Bill to protect women. Sall Grover inter…

Matt Canavan  All good. Look, well, it's great to be here with my friend and colleague, Alison Pe...

The Human Supplement Craze Has Officially Gone to the D…

Australians’ appetite for supplements is no longer limited to their own vitamin cabinets. New reta...

The Teals: Can They Spoil Australia’s New Attraction to…

Australian politics is shifting again. For years, the dominant national contest revolved around L...

Property Paralysis: Buyers Hesitate As Australia’s Hous…

Australia’s property market may still be active, but beneath the auctions, listings and glossy rea...

The Return Of Practical Luxury: Buyers Want Quality Aga…

For years, consumer culture revolved around speed and abundance. Fast fashion.Fast furniture.Fast...

People Are Going Out Less — And Businesses Know It

Restaurants are full on some nights. Concerts still sell tickets. Sporting events attract crowds. ...

Why Shopping Centres No Longer Feel Exciting

There was a time when going to the shopping centre felt like an event. Families spent entire Satu...