The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

63% of workers who file an EEOC discrimination complaint lose their jobs

  • Written by Donald T. Tomaskovic-Devey, Professor of Sociology and Director of the Center for Employment Equity, University of Massachusetts Amherst
63% of workers who file an EEOC discrimination complaint lose their jobs CC BY-NC-ND[1] People who experience sex discrimination, race discrimination and other forms of discrimination at work aren’t getting much protection from the laws designed to shield them from it. That’s our main finding[2] after analyzing the outcomes of 683,419 discrimination cases filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from 2012 to 2016 – the most recent data available. We focused on workplace complaints filed related to race, sex, disability, age and national origin. Those are the five most common categories. We found that at least 63% of workers who filed a complaint eventually lost their job. That number was even higher for workers who filed a disability-related claim, at 67%. And about 40% of workers reporting experiencing employer retaliation, such as verbal abuse or being passed over for work opportunities like training or promotion, for filing a claim. At 46%, employer retaliation was most common for sex discrimination cases. Moreover, the complaints themselves rarely led to a successful outcome for the workers who filed them. Our analysis found that legal redress in the form of negotiated or mandated changes in workplace practices occurred in only 7% of all cases. Workers received monetary awards in 12% of the cases – with a median payout of only US$8,500. These patterns may explain why only a fraction of people who believe that they have experienced discrimination[3] at work actually file a complaint. Legal standards to prove discrimination to the EEOC or in court are quite high, and the burden of proof falls largely on the employee. Low rates of discrimination claim filing may also suggest that people see the legal route as dangerous with low chances of success. Enduring discrimination on the job and proving it in court or to the government are quite different things. Lawmakers have been debating[4] measures to beef up protections for workers for years, such as the Paycheck Fairness Act[5], a bill aimed at wage discrimination, or paying workers doing the same job differently based on their sex, race or national origin. Besides increasing pay transparency, the bill would shift more of the burden of proof to the employer. While we believe passage of this legislation would be a good step to encourage more workers to report discrimination, our research shows that increased protections should be applied to all types of discrimination. But giving workers the protection from discrimination that we feel they deserve likely will require stronger enforcement efforts and stiffer penalties[6] for employers who break the law. [Like what you’ve read? Want more? Sign up for The Conversation’s daily newsletter[7].]

Read more https://theconversation.com/63-of-workers-who-file-an-eeoc-discrimination-complaint-lose-their-jobs-163048

Times Magazine

With Nvidia’s second-best AI chips headed for China, the US shifts priorities from security to trade

This week, US President Donald Trump approved previously banned exports[1] of Nvidia’s powerful ...

Navman MiVue™ True 4K PRO Surround honest review

If you drive a car, you should have a dashcam. Need convincing? All I ask that you do is search fo...

Australia’s supercomputers are falling behind – and it’s hurting our ability to adapt to climate change

As Earth continues to warm, Australia faces some important decisions. For example, where shou...

Australia’s electric vehicle surge — EVs and hybrids hit record levels

Australians are increasingly embracing electric and hybrid cars, with 2025 shaping up as the str...

Tim Ayres on the AI rollout’s looming ‘bumps and glitches’

The federal government released its National AI Strategy[1] this week, confirming it has dropped...

Seven in Ten Australian Workers Say Employers Are Failing to Prepare Them for AI Future

As artificial intelligence (AI) accelerates across industries, a growing number of Australian work...

The Times Features

Surviving “the wet”: how local tourism and accommodation businesses can sustain cash flow in the off-season

Across northern Australia and many coastal regions, “the wet” is not just a weather pattern — it...

“Go west!” Is housing affordable for a single-income family — and where should they look?

For decades, “Go west!” has been shorthand advice for Australians priced out of Sydney and Melbo...

Housing in Canberra: is affordable housing now just a dream?

Canberra was once seen as an outlier in Australia’s housing story — a planned city with steady e...

What effect do residential short-term rentals have on lifestyle and the housing market in Brisbane?

Walk through inner-Brisbane suburbs like Fortitude Valley, New Farm, West End or Teneriffe and i...

The Sydney Harbour Bridge faces tolls once again — despite tolls being abolished years ago. Why?

For many Sydney motorists, the Harbour Bridge toll was meant to be history. The toll booths cam...

The Victorian Paradox: how Labor keeps winning elections even when it feels “unpopular”

If you spend any time in a Melbourne café, a tradie ute yard, a Facebook comments section, or th...

I’m heading overseas. Do I really need travel vaccines?

Australia is in its busiest month[1] for short-term overseas travel. And there are so many thi...

Mint Payments partners with Zip Co to add flexible payment options for travel merchants

Mint Payments, Australia's leading travel payments specialist, today announced a partnership with ...

When Holiday Small Talk Hurts Inclusion at Work

Dr. Tatiana Andreeva, Associate Professor in Management and Organisational Behaviour, Maynooth U...