The Times Australia
Saturday, April 5, 2025 12:49:19 AM
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Flawed medical studies can end up in doctors’ advice. We developed a tool to stop it

  • Written by Aya Mousa, Senior Research Fellow in Women's Cardiometabolic Health, Monash University

Good health care depends on evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. They translate the best available research into recommendations that shape diagnosis, treatment, and prevention strategies.

But what happens when the studies underpinning these guidelines are flawed?

Evidence suggests[1] scientific misconduct – from fabricated or manipulated data to methodological errors and ethical concerns – is a growing problem. In some disciplines, estimates[2] suggest as many as 40% of studies included in systematic reviews may have issues with their integrity.

This is not just an academic issue. When flawed studies are used to guide real-world health care, the consequences for health-care providers and ultimately patients can be serious. They include unnecessary or even harmful treatments, delay or denial of other effective treatments, wasted resources and a loss of public trust in science and health care itself.

Yet until recently, there has been no formal method to identify and manage flawed studies, before they make their way into clinical recommendations. We recently helped develop a framework[3] that addresses this crucial gap. Published in The Lancet’s eClinicalMedicine[4], this framework provides a step-by-step process for evaluating the integrity of studies used in clinical guidelines and systematic reviews.

In an era of increasing concern about research misconduct, it’s a timely and much-needed advance.

Clinical care relies on research integrity

Randomised controlled trials are considered the gold standard in medical research.

Their results often underpin clinical guidelines that shape day-to-day decisions in health care. But what if a randomised controlled trial contains fabricated data? Or is conducted without ethics approval? Or is retracted after being used in a previous guideline?

A 2020 study[5] found 44% of randomised controlled trials submitted to a major medical journal between 2017 and 2020 contained problematic or false data.

Compounding the problem is the fact that journal editors and publishers can be very slow to respond to concerns about research integrity.

For example, between November 2017 and April 2024, a group of researchers wrote to editors and publishers[6] of 891 potentially untrustworthy papers published in 206 different journals. At the time their study was published earlier this year, only 30% of the papers they flagged had received an outcome – 58% of which were retracted.

Notably, it took a median time of 38 months for editors and publishers to make a decision. In only 13% of the flagged cases was a decision made within 12 months.

The ripple effects of this can be enormous. A review[7] by the independent Cochrane Collaboration of nutrition interventions in pregnancy found that removing studies with integrity concerns changed the conclusions of 72% of reviews. One third (33%) needed to be updated because their guidance was no longer reliable.

Integrity concerns vary across fields. But some, such as complementary therapies or supplements[8], can be particularly prone to these concerns.

Despite this, most guideline development tools — including those from the World Health Organization[9] — assess methodological quality, not the trustworthiness or integrity of the studies that are included.

A doctor reading on a computer tablet.
When flawed studies are used to guide real-world medical advice, the consequences for doctors and ultimately patients can be serious. Yuri A/Shutterstock[10]

A practical framework for safeguarding integrity

Our framework[11] features a six-step process for safeguarding research integrity:

  • Review: conduct a standard systematic review to identify eligible studies
  • Exclude: remove studies that have been formally retracted or are flagged with serious concerns
  • Assess: use available tools and checklists to assess the integrity of the remaining studies
  • Discuss: convene an independent integrity committee to review ratings and vote on each study
  • Establish contact: reach out to authors of high-risk studies to clarify issues or provide missing information
  • Reassess: based on responses (or lack thereof), determine whether a study should be included, excluded, or held in limbo.

The integrity committee is central to this approach. It is a multidisciplinary group responsible for assessing studies objectively, without preconceived judgements or biases around which studies to exclude.

Applying the framework to the real world

Our framework was developed alongside the international evidence-based guideline[12] for polycystic ovary syndrome.

Polycystic ovary syndrome is a common hormonal, reproductive and metabolic condition affecting 8–13% of women of reproductive age[13], depending on the diagnostic criteria used. It can cause irregular menstrual cycles, elevated androgen levels, and an increased number of small follicles in the ovaries, visible on ultrasound. It is a leading cause of infertility[14].

The guideline was developed with input from diverse professional and consumer groups. It was endorsed by 39 organisations across six continents.

In making recommendations on infertility treatment in polycystic ovary syndrome, 101 studies were initially identified. After applying our framework, 45 studies were not included due to concerns about integrity. Only three authors responded to clarification requests. This illustrates the problem with transparency after publication.

Without our framework, these problematic studies may have directly shaped recommendations and health care for women with polycystic ovary syndrome around the world.

Our framework was incorporated into the National Health and Medical Research Council review process that approved the guidelines. It has since been applied to other guidelines in women’s health. Further scale up is planned.

Person holding smartphone with logo of US publishing company John Wiley and Sons Inc. in front of website.
A 2020 study found 44% of randomised controlled trials submitted to a major medical journal between 2017 and 2020 contained false data. T.Schneider/Shutterstock[15]

Some drawbacks

While our framework offers a much-needed solution, it’s not without drawbacks.

First, the tools it relies on — such as a checklist for measuring trustworthiness in randomised controlled trials[16] and the research integrity assessment tool[17] — are still being refined. They also need to be validated across different research contexts.

Second, older studies (conducted before trial registries were common) or those from countries with different ethics standards, may be unfairly penalised.

There is also a risk that valid research could be excluded simply because authors do not respond to integrity enquiries.

Implementing the framework can also take time. In resource-limited settings, this may be a barrier.

But failing to assess integrity will likely cost more in the long run. It could lead to flawed recommendations, misplaced public confidence and patient harm.

References

  1. ^ Evidence suggests (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ estimates (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  3. ^ framework (www.thelancet.com)
  4. ^ eClinicalMedicine (www.thelancet.com)
  5. ^ A 2020 study (associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  6. ^ a group of researchers wrote to editors and publishers (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  7. ^ review (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)
  8. ^ complementary therapies or supplements (pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  9. ^ World Health Organization (www.who.int)
  10. ^ Yuri A/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  11. ^ framework (www.thelancet.com)
  12. ^ international evidence-based guideline (academic.oup.com)
  13. ^ affecting 8–13% of women of reproductive age (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  14. ^ leading cause of infertility (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ T.Schneider/Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  16. ^ a checklist for measuring trustworthiness in randomised controlled trials (researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com)
  17. ^ research integrity assessment tool (onlinelibrary.wiley.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/flawed-medical-studies-can-end-up-in-doctors-advice-we-developed-a-tool-to-stop-it-253213

The Times Features

The Benefits of Animal-Assisted Speech Therapy For Children

Speech therapy has long been a standard for supporting children’s communication and emotional development. But what happens when you introduce a furry friend into the process? Th...

The Hidden Dangers of Blocked Drains and the Ultimate Solution for a Hassle-Free Home

Drain blockages are a big hassle to every homeowner and business owner alike. Whether it is a sink in the kitchen or bathroom, a clogged toilet, or a foul smell circulating aroun...

Understanding the Dangers of Ignoring a Gas Leak

Gas leaks are silent threats lurking within both homes and workplaces. A gas leak occurs when natural gas or any other gaseous substance escapes from a pipeline or containment. T...

Can You Sell Your House Privately in Queensland? Here’s How

Selling a house privately in Queensland is entirely possible and can be a cost-effective alternative to using a real estate agent. While agents provide valuable expertise, their co...

Itinerary to Maximize Your Two-Week Adventure in Vietnam and Cambodia

Two weeks may not seem like much, but it’s just the right time for travelers to explore the best of Vietnam and Cambodia. From the bustling streets of Hanoi to the magnificent te...

How to Protect Your Garden Trees from Wind Damage in Australia

In Australia's expansive landscape, garden trees hold noteworthy significance. They not only enhance the aesthetic appeal of our homes but also play an integral role in the local...

Times Magazine

CWU Assistive Tech Hub is Changing Lives: Win a Free Rollator Walker This Easter!

🌟 Mobility. Independence. Community. All in One. This Easter, the CWU Assistive Tech Hub is pleased to support the Banyule community by giving away a rollator walker. The giveaway will take place during the Macleod Village Easter Egg Hunt & Ma...

"Eternal Nurture" by Cara Barilla: A Timeless Collection of Wisdom and Healing

Renowned Sydney-born author and educator Cara Barilla has released her latest book, Eternal Nurture, a profound collection of inspirational quotes designed to support mindfulness, emotional healing, and personal growth. With a deep commitment to ...

How AI-Driven SEO Enhancements Can Improve Headless CMS Content Visibility

Whereas SEO (search engine optimization) is critical in the digital landscape for making connections to content, much of it is still done manually keyword research, metatags, final tweaks at publication requiring a human element that takes extensiv...

Crypto Expert John Fenga Reveals How Blockchain is Revolutionising Charity

One of the most persistent challenges in the charity sector is trust. Donors often wonder whether their contributions are being used effectively or if overhead costs consume a significant portion. Traditional fundraising methods can be opaque, with...

Navigating Parenting Arrangements in Australia: A Legal Guide for Parents

Understanding Parenting Arrangements in Australia. Child custody disputes are often one of the most emotionally charged aspects of separation or divorce. Parents naturally want what is best for their children, but the legal process of determining ...

Blocky Adventures: A Minecraft Movie Celebration for Your Wrist

The Minecraft movie is almost here—and it’s time to get excited! With the film set to hit theaters on April 4, 2025, fans have a brand-new reason to celebrate. To honor the upcoming blockbuster, watchfaces.co has released a special Minecraft-inspir...

LayBy Shopping