The Times Australia
Wednesday, February 26, 2025 12:16:21 AM
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Don’t rely on social media users for fact-checking. Many don’t care much about the common good

  • Written by Mark Andrejevic, Professor of Media, School of Media, Film, and Journalism, Monash University, Monash University

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election victory, Meta chief executive Mark Zuckerberg fired[1] the fact-checking team for his company’s social media platforms. At the same time, he reversed Facebook’s turn away from political content.

The decision is widely viewed as placating an incoming president with a known penchant for mangling[2] the truth.

Meta will replace[3] its fact-checkers with the “community notes” model used by X, the platform owned by avid Trump supporter Elon Musk. This model relies on users to add corrections to false or misleading posts.

Musk has described[4] this model as “citizen journalism, where you hear from the people. It’s by the people, for the people.”

For such an approach to work, both citizen journalists and their readers need to value good-faith deliberation, accuracy and accountability. But our new research[5] shows social media users may not be the best crowd to source in this regard.

Our research

Working with Essential Media[6], our team wanted to know what social media users think of common civic values.

After reviewing existing research on social cohesion[7] and political polarisation[8] and conducting ten focus groups, we compiled a civic values scale. It aims to measure levels of trust in media institutions and the government, as well as people’s openness to considering perspectives that challenge their own.

We then conducted a large-scale survey of 2,046 Australians. We asked people how strongly they believed in a common public interest. We also asked about how important they thought it was for Australians to inform themselves about political issues and for schools to teach civics.

Importantly, we asked them where they got their news: social media, commercial television, commercial radio, newspapers or non-commercial media.

What did we find?

We found people who rely on social media for news score significantly lower on a civic values scale than those who rely on newspapers and non-commercial broadcasters such as the ABC.

By contrast, people who rely on non-commercial radio scored highest on the civic values scale. They scored 11% higher than those who rely mainly on social media and 12% higher than those who rely on commercial television.

The lowest score was for people who rely primarily on commercial radio.

People who relied on newspapers, online news aggregators, and non-commercial TV all scored significantly higher than those who relied on social media and commercial broadcasting.

The survey also found that as the number of different media sources people use daily increased, so too did their civic values score.

This research does not indicate whether platforms foster lower civic values or simply cater to them.

But it does raise concerns about social media becoming an increasingly important source of political information in democratic societies like Australia.

Why measure values?

The point of the civic values scale we developed is to highlight the fact that the values people bring to news about the world is as important as the news content.

For example, most people in the United States have likely heard about the violence of the attack on the Capitol protesting Trump’s loss in 2020.

That Trump and his supporters can recast this violent riot as “a day of love[9]” is not the result of a lack of information.

It is, rather, a symptom of people’s lack of trust in media and government institutions and their unwillingness to confront facts that challenge their views.

In other words, it is not enough to provide people with accurate information. What counts is the mindset they bring to that information.

No place for debate

Critics have long been concerned that social media platforms do not serve democracy well, privileging sensationalism and virality over thoughtful and accurate posts. As the critical theorist Judith Butler put it[10]:

the quickness of social media allows for forms of vitriol that do not exactly support thoughtful debate.

Sociologist Zeynep Tufekci[11] said social media is less about meaningful engagement than bonding with like-minded people and mocking perceived opponents. She notes, “belonging is stronger than facts”.

Her observation is likely familiar to anyone who has tried to engage in a politically charged discussion on social media.

These criticisms are commonplace in discussions of social media but have not been systematically tested until now.

Social media platforms are not designed[12] to foster democracy. Their business model is based on encouraging people to see themselves as brands competing for attention, rather than as citizens engaged in meaningful deliberation.

This is not a recipe for responsible fact-checking. Or for encouraging users to care much about it.

Platforms want to wash their hands of the fact-checking process, because it is politically fraught. Their owners claim they want to encourage the free flow of information.

However, their fingers are on the scale. The algorithms they craft play a central role in deciding which forms of expression make it into our feeds and which do not.

It’s disingenuous for them to abdicate responsibility for the content they chose to pump into people’s news feeds, especially when they have systematically created a civically challenged media environment.

The author would like to acknowledge Associate Professor Zala Volcic, Research Fellow Isabella Mahoney and Research Assistant Fae Gehren for their work on the research on which this article is based.

References

  1. ^ fired (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ mangling (www.washingtonpost.com)
  3. ^ replace (www.abc.net.au)
  4. ^ described (www.instagram.com)
  5. ^ research (drive.google.com)
  6. ^ Essential Media (essentialmedia.com.au)
  7. ^ social cohesion (scanloninstitute.org.au)
  8. ^ political polarisation (www.pewresearch.org)
  9. ^ a day of love (www.npr.org)
  10. ^ put it (www.newstatesman.com)
  11. ^ Zeynep Tufekci (www.technologyreview.com)
  12. ^ not designed (www.linkedin.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/dont-rely-on-social-media-users-for-fact-checking-many-dont-care-much-about-the-common-good-246977

The Times Features

Australian Pro Adaptive Surfing Championships: A Global Showcase of Resilience and Talent

The BrightSky Australian Pro Adaptive Surfing Championships returns to Byron Bay on March 23 – 30, marking the first stop on the Adaptive Surfing Professionals World Tour (AASP)...

England subsidises drugs like Ozepmic for weight loss. Could Australia follow?

People with a high body weight living in England can now access[1] subsidised weight-loss drugs[2] to treat their obesity. This includes Wegovy (the weight-loss dose of Ozemp...

5 years on, COVID remains NZ’s most important infectious disease – it still demands a strong response

This Friday, February 28, marks five years since COVID-19 was first reported[1] in Aotearoa New Zealand. At a population level, it remains our most harmful infectious disease...

Seamless Kitchen Sink Installation: Achieving a Perfect Fit

A seamless installation needs to be well-planned. Site, material, and process all go into the final outcome. Installing a new piece or replacing a very old piece, exactness is ...

Studies of Parkinson’s disease have long overlooked Pacific populations – our work shows why that must change

A form of Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in a gene known as PINK1 has long been labelled rare. But our research[1] shows it’s anything but – at least for some popula...

A Simple Guide to Assembling a Home Electrical Toolkit

Having a well-equipped home electrical toolkit is essential for any homeowner. It allows you to tackle minor repairs and conduct routine maintenance with confidence. Imagine the ...

Times Magazine

First Nations Writers Festival

The First Nations Writers Festival (FNWF) is back for its highly anticipated 2025 edition, continuing its mission to celebrate the voices, cultures and traditions of First Nations communities through literature, art and storytelling. Set to take ...

Improving Website Performance with a Cloud VPS

Websites represent the new mantra of success. One slow website may make escape for visitors along with income too. Therefore it's an extra offer to businesses seeking better performance with more scalability and, thus represents an added attracti...

Why You Should Choose Digital Printing for Your Next Project

In the rapidly evolving world of print media, digital printing has emerged as a cornerstone technology that revolutionises how businesses and creative professionals produce printed materials. Offering unparalleled flexibility, speed, and quality, d...

What to Look for When Booking an Event Space in Melbourne

Define your event needs early to streamline venue selection and ensure a good fit. Choose a well-located, accessible venue with good transport links and parking. Check for key amenities such as catering, AV equipment, and flexible seating. Pla...

How BIM Software is Transforming Architecture and Engineering

Building Information Modeling (BIM) software has become a cornerstone of modern architecture and engineering practices, revolutionizing how professionals design, collaborate, and execute projects. By enabling more efficient workflows and fostering ...

How 32-Inch Computer Monitors Can Increase Your Workflow

With the near-constant usage of technology around the world today, ergonomics have become crucial in business. Moving to 32 inch computer monitors is perhaps one of the best and most valuable improvements you can possibly implement. This-sized moni...

LayBy Shopping