The Times Australia
Google AI
The Times World News

.

Instead of banning kids from online spaces, here’s what we should offer them instead

  • Written by Amanda Third, Co-Director, Young and Resilient Research Centre/Professorial Research Fellow, Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University

Children and young people go online primarily to socialise with their peers[5]. Online spaces are one of the few avenues our overscheduled children[6] have to interact freely with each other, which is crucial for their wellbeing.

A social media ban will close down this avenue and force children into lower-quality online environments. Children already say adults don’t understand what they do online and are underequipped to support them[7].

A blanket ban affirms parents “don’t get it”. Kids will find ways to get around the ban. And if their interactions turn sour on social media, the fact they were not supposed to be there will make it more difficult to reach out to adults for help.

Crucially, demands for blanket bans – challenging to implement – also force tech platforms into “compliance mode”. They divert company resources away from designing better online environments for children and into litigation[8].

What should we do instead of a ban?

Our children’s online safety is a collective responsibility[9]. There are constructive steps we can take, but they need more cooperation between governments, industry, the community sector, parents, caregivers, educators, researchers, and children and young people themselves.

All children learn by taking risks and making mistakes. The focus needs to be on eliminating online harms, and equipping children and their caregivers to deal confidently with the digital world.

Tighter regulation is part of the solution. But making the internet a better place for children – not just banning them – is the very best protection we can provide.

So, what would that look like?

One way is to implement safety-by-design principles[10]. Popularised internationally by the Australian eSafety Commissioner, safety by design is what it sounds like – baking safety features into the DNA of technological products and platforms.

Here, we should take the lead from children themselves[11]. They are urging platforms and governments to do several things:

  • give minors privacy by default
  • provide standardised, easily accessible and well-explained reporting processes across diverse platforms
  • use AI to detect bad actors attempting to interact with children.

Children also want to know what data is collected from them, how it is used, by whom, and for what purposes.

They’re also calling for safety-by-design features that eliminate sexual, violent and other age-inappropriate content from their feeds.

All of these steps would help to strengthen the things they already do[12] to take care of themselves and others online – like being cautious when interacting with people they don’t know, and not sharing personal information or images online.

Two kids outdoors in bright clothing taking a photo with a smartphone.
Designing optimal online spaces for children in various age groups is more constructive than a ban. Tim Gouw/Unsplash[13]

Not just safe, but optimal

Safety by design is not the whole solution. Building on the efforts to develop industry codes[14], industry and government should come together to develop a wider range of standards that deliver not just safe, but optimal digital environments for children.

How? High-quality, child-centred evidence can help major platforms develop industry-wide standards that define what kinds of content are appropriate for children of different ages.

We also need targeted education for children that builds their digital capabilities[15] and prepares them to deal with and grow through their engagement online.

For example, rather than education that focuses on extreme harms, children are calling for online safety education in schools and elsewhere that supports them to manage the low-level, everyday risks of harm they encounter online: disagreements with friends, inappropriate content or feeling excluded.

Heed the evidence

Some authoritative, evidence-based guidance[16] already exists. It tells us how to ensure children can mitigate potential harms and maximise the benefits of the digital environment.

Where the evidence doesn’t yet exist, we need to invest in child-centred research. It’s the best method for gaining nuanced accounts of children’s digital practices, and can guide a coherent and strategic long-term approach to policy and practice[17].

Drawing on lessons from the COVID pandemic[18], we also need to better align evidence with decision-making processes. This means speeding up high-quality, robust research processes or finding ways for research to better anticipate and generate evidence around emerging challenges. This way, governments can weigh up the benefits and drawbacks of particular policy actions.

Technology is not beyond our control. Rather, we need to decide, together, what role we want technology to play in childhood.

We need to move beyond a protectionist focus and work with children themselves[19] to build the very best digital environments we can imagine. Nothing short of the future is at stake in doing so.

References

  1. ^ sounds like a seductive idea (theconversation.com)
  2. ^ navigating their kids’ lives (theconversation.com)
  3. ^ unlikely bans will positively impact the youth mental health crisis (www.beyondblue.org.au)
  4. ^ may make our children even more vulnerable (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ go online primarily to socialise with their peers (www.westernsydney.edu.au)
  6. ^ overscheduled children (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ are underequipped to support them (www.esafety.gov.au)
  8. ^ into litigation (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ collective responsibility (minister.infrastructure.gov.au)
  10. ^ safety-by-design principles (www.esafety.gov.au)
  11. ^ take the lead from children themselves (www.westernsydney.edu.au)
  12. ^ strengthen the things they already do (www.savethechildren.org.au)
  13. ^ Tim Gouw/Unsplash (unsplash.com)
  14. ^ industry codes (www.esafety.gov.au)
  15. ^ digital capabilities (www.westernsydney.edu.au)
  16. ^ evidence-based guidance (www.ohchr.org)
  17. ^ long-term approach to policy and practice (journals.sagepub.com)
  18. ^ Drawing on lessons from the COVID pandemic (philarchive.org)
  19. ^ work with children themselves (researchdirect.westernsydney.edu.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/instead-of-banning-kids-from-online-spaces-heres-what-we-should-offer-them-instead-238798

Times Magazine

With Nvidia’s second-best AI chips headed for China, the US shifts priorities from security to trade

This week, US President Donald Trump approved previously banned exports[1] of Nvidia’s powerful ...

Navman MiVue™ True 4K PRO Surround honest review

If you drive a car, you should have a dashcam. Need convincing? All I ask that you do is search fo...

Australia’s supercomputers are falling behind – and it’s hurting our ability to adapt to climate change

As Earth continues to warm, Australia faces some important decisions. For example, where shou...

Australia’s electric vehicle surge — EVs and hybrids hit record levels

Australians are increasingly embracing electric and hybrid cars, with 2025 shaping up as the str...

Tim Ayres on the AI rollout’s looming ‘bumps and glitches’

The federal government released its National AI Strategy[1] this week, confirming it has dropped...

Seven in Ten Australian Workers Say Employers Are Failing to Prepare Them for AI Future

As artificial intelligence (AI) accelerates across industries, a growing number of Australian work...

The Times Features

I’m heading overseas. Do I really need travel vaccines?

Australia is in its busiest month[1] for short-term overseas travel. And there are so many thi...

Mint Payments partners with Zip Co to add flexible payment options for travel merchants

Mint Payments, Australia's leading travel payments specialist, today announced a partnership with ...

When Holiday Small Talk Hurts Inclusion at Work

Dr. Tatiana Andreeva, Associate Professor in Management and Organisational Behaviour, Maynooth U...

Human Rights Day: The Right to Shelter Isn’t Optional

It is World Human Rights Day this week. Across Australia, politicians read declarations and clai...

In awkward timing, government ends energy rebate as it defends Wells’ spendathon

There are two glaring lessons for politicians from the Anika Wells’ entitlements affair. First...

Australia’s Coffee Culture Faces an Afternoon Rethink as New Research Reveals a Surprising Blind Spot

Australia’s celebrated coffee culture may be world‑class in the morning, but new research* sugge...

Reflections invests almost $1 million in Tumut River park to boost regional tourism

Reflections Holidays, the largest adventure holiday park group in New South Wales, has launched ...

Groundbreaking Trial: Fish Oil Slashes Heart Complications in Dialysis Patients

A significant development for patients undergoing dialysis for kidney failure—a group with an except...

Worried after sunscreen recalls? Here’s how to choose a safe one

Most of us know sunscreen is a key way[1] to protect areas of our skin not easily covered by c...