The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

The government says more people need to use AI. Here’s why that’s wrong

  • Written by Erica Mealy, Lecturer in Computer Science, University of the Sunshine Coast



The Australian government this week released voluntary artificial intelligence (AI) safety standards[1], alongside a proposals paper[2] calling for greater regulation of the use of the fast-growing technology in high-risk situations.

The take-home message[3] from federal Minister for Industry and Science, Ed Husic, was:

We need more people to use AI and to do that we need to build trust.

But why exactly do people need to trust this technology? And why exactly do more people need to use it?

AI systems are trained on incomprehensibly large data sets using advanced mathematics most people don’t understand. They produce results we have no way of verifying. Even flagship, state-of-the-art systems produce output riddled with errors.

ChatGPT appears to be growing less accurate over time[4]. Even at its best it can’t tell you what letters[5] are in the word “strawberry”. Meanwhile, Google’s Gemini chatbot has recommended putting glue on pizza[6], among other comical failures.

Given all this, public distrust of AI seems entirely reasonable. The case for using more of it seems quite weak – and also potentially dangerous.

Man speaks to the media at a press conference.
Federal Minister for Industry and Science Ed Husic wants more people to use AI. Mick Tsikas/AAP[7]

AI risks

Much has been made of the “existential threat” of AI[8], and how it will lead to job losses. The harms AI presents range from the overt – such as autonomous vehicles that hit pedestrians[9] – to the more subtle, such as AI recruitment systems that demonstrate bias against women[10] or AI legal system tools with a bias against people of colour[11].

Other harms include fraud from deepfakes of coworkers[12] and of loved ones[13].

Never mind that the federal government’s own recent reporting[14] showed humans are more effective, efficient and productive than AI.

But if all you have is a hammer[15], everything looks like a nail.

Technology adoption still falls into this familiar trope. AI is not always the best tool for the job[16]. But when faced with an exciting new technology, we often use it without considering if we should.

Instead of encouraging more people to use AI, we should all learn what is a good, and not good, use of AI.

Is it the technology we need to trust – or the government?

Just what does the Australian government get from more people using AI?

One of the largest risks is the leaking of private data[17]. These tools are collecting our private information, our intellectual property and our thoughts on a scale we have never before seen.

Much of this data, in the case of ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Otter.ai and other AI models, is not processed onshore in Australia.

These companies preach transparency, privacy and security[18]. But it is often hard to uncover if your data is used[19] for training their newer models, how they secure it[20], or what other organisations or governments have access to that data.

Recently, federal Minister for Government Services, Bill Shorten, presented the government’s proposed Trust Exchange program, which raised concerns about the collection of even more data about Australian citizens[21]. In his speech to the National Press Club, Shorten openly noted the support from large technology companies, including Google[22].

If data about Australians was to be collated across different technology platforms, including AI, we could see widespread mass surveillance.

But even more worryingly, we have observed the power of technology to influence politics[23] and behaviour.

Automation bias[24] is the terminology we use for the tendency for users to believe the technology is “smarter” then they are. Too much trust in AI poses even more risk to Australians – by encouraging more use of technology without adequate education, we could be subjecting our population to a comprehensive system of automated surveillance and control.

And although you might be able to escape this system, it would undermine social trust and cohesion and influence people without them knowing.

These factors are even more reason to regulate the use of AI, as the Australian government is now looking to do. But doing so does not have to be accompanied by a forceful encouragement to also use it.

Let’s dial down the blind hype

The topic of AI regulation is important.

The International Organisation for Standardisation has established a standard on the use and management of AI systems[25]. Its implementation in Australia would lead to better, more well-reasoned and regulated use of AI.

This standard and others are the foundation of the government’s proposed Voluntary AI Safety standard.

What was problematic in this week’s announcement from the federal government was not the call for greater regulation, but the blind hyping of AI use.

Let’s focus on protecting Australians – not on mandating their need to use, and trust, AI.

References

  1. ^ voluntary artificial intelligence (AI) safety standards (www.industry.gov.au)
  2. ^ proposals paper (business.gov.au)
  3. ^ take-home message (www.minister.industry.gov.au)
  4. ^ ChatGPT appears to be growing less accurate over time (decrypt.co)
  5. ^ can’t tell you what letters (www.inc-aus.com)
  6. ^ Google’s Gemini chatbot has recommended putting glue on pizza (www.forbes.com)
  7. ^ Mick Tsikas/AAP (photos.aap.com.au)
  8. ^ “existential threat” of AI (www.scientificamerican.com)
  9. ^ autonomous vehicles that hit pedestrians (www.reuters.com)
  10. ^ AI recruitment systems that demonstrate bias against women (www.reuters.com)
  11. ^ tools with a bias against people of colour (www.propublica.org)
  12. ^ coworkers (edition.cnn.com)
  13. ^ loved ones (www.newyorker.com)
  14. ^ federal government’s own recent reporting (ia.acs.org.au)
  15. ^ all you have is a hammer (everydayconcepts.io)
  16. ^ AI is not always the best tool for the job (digileaders.com)
  17. ^ leaking of private data (link.springer.com)
  18. ^ transparency, privacy and security (otter.ai)
  19. ^ your data is used (botpress.com)
  20. ^ how they secure it (cybersecurity.att.com)
  21. ^ collection of even more data about Australian citizens (efa.org.au)
  22. ^ including Google (ministers.dss.gov.au)
  23. ^ influence politics (theconversation.com)
  24. ^ Automation bias (www.forbes.com)
  25. ^ use and management of AI systems (www.iso.org)

Read more https://theconversation.com/the-government-says-more-people-need-to-use-ai-heres-why-thats-wrong-238327

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Tricia Paoluccio designer to the stars

The Case for Nuturing Creativity in the Classroom, and in our Lives I am an actress and an artist who has had the privilege of sharing my work across many countries, touring my ...

Duke of Dural to Get Rooftop Bar as New Owners Invest in Venue Upgrade

The Duke of Dural, in Sydney’s north-west, is set for a major uplift under new ownership, following its acquisition by hospitality group Good Beer Company this week. Led by resp...

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...