Google AI
The Times Australia

Times Media

How much should you read into your child’s NAPLAN report?

  • Written by: Sam Sellar, Professor of Education Policy, University of South Australia

This week, the national 2024 NAPLAN results[1] were released.

This was met with headlines raising alarm about one in three students not meeting literacy and numeracy standards[2]. While these headlines may be worrying to parents, they do not say anything about individual students.

Families have been receiving individual student results since the beginning of Term 3. Here are a few things to help your digest the results.

What is NAPLAN for?

The National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) is an annual test for students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9. It was established in 2008 and the results have been used for a range of purposes, including comparing the performance of schools and making decisions about school funding.

Over time, NAPLAN has provided us with some very clear messages about inequalities in outcomes[3] based on students’ social, economic and cultural backgrounds. Unfortunately this hasn’t changed this year.

Indeed, as education researcher Sally Larsen has noted[4], this year’s national results didn’t tell us very much that is different from last year.

A teacher stands and holds a tablet. Primary-aged children sit at desks, looking at the teacher.
NAPLAN tests are held every year for all students in years 3,5,7 and 9. Monkey Business Images/ Shutterstock, CC BY[5][6]

How should NAPLAN be used?

While NAPLAN has provided population-level insights, traditionally, it has not been particularly useful for teachers and families because results were provided late in the school year, without much time to respond.

A number of changes were made last year, including moving the test from May to March, so teachers and parents can respond within the same school year.

Results are now be reported against four new proficiency standards: “exceeding”, “strong”, “developing” and “needs additional support”, rather than the ten numbered bands used previously.

These changes were designed to make it clearer for schools and parents to understand and use the results.

What does it mean for families and schools?

NAPLAN is just one test among many that schools use to assess student learning. Teachers regularly use other standardised assessments to measure progression in reading, maths and other areas.

Research has shown[7] teachers’ assessments of student performance are similar to NAPLAN results, which suggests NAPLAN data doesn’t offer much of an advance on the information already provided in school report cards. Some researchers argue NAPLAN is not a good tool for comparing individual performance over time[8].

There is also evidence[9] students do not try as hard as they might in NAPLAN testing.

We know NAPLAN only provides a snapshot of student performance on a given day in March each year. It is just one element in broader and more in-depth assessments teachers and schools provide throughout the year.

So, teachers can use the results to inform their decisions about which students need additional support and which students might benefit from additional challenges (but that may not come as much of a surprise).

Parents can use the individual results to talk to teachers about their child’s progress and what support they might need – knowing this is simply one test among many.

References

  1. ^ 2024 NAPLAN results (www.acara.edu.au)
  2. ^ one in three students not meeting literacy and numeracy standards (theconversation.com)
  3. ^ inequalities in outcomes (theconversation.com)
  4. ^ has noted (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ Monkey Business Images/ Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  6. ^ CC BY (creativecommons.org)
  7. ^ has shown (research.usq.edu.au)
  8. ^ over time (theconversation.com)
  9. ^ evidence (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/how-much-should-you-read-into-your-childs-naplan-report-236884

Times Magazine

The $4,699 iPhone: why people still want Apple’s best

The iPhone 18 Pro Max can cost more than many people would spend on a computer. Its appeal says as...

BYD Shark 6 v Toyota LandCruiser 300: can new technology defeat an Australian legend?

The BYD Shark 6 and Toyota LandCruiser 300 Series may appear to belong in different vehicle catego...

Australia Needs Permission Budgets for AI Agents

The Times recently argued that Australia should keep building the data centres the AI economy requ...

Technology

The $4,699 iPhone: why people still…

The iPhone 18 Pro Max can cost more than many people would spend on a computer. Its appeal says as...

Local News

Fitstop Global Games to Bring 1,000…

The Australian-born fitness brand is bringing its global competition home, with athletes from across...

Culture

The $4,699 iPhone: why people still want Appl…

The iPhone 18 Pro Max can cost more than many people would spend on a computer. Its appeal says as...

Travel

School holiday pricing: fair market economics…

Every Australian family with school-aged children knows the pattern. Look at an airfare, hotel ro...

The Times Features

Could a Prescription for a Bushwalk or Art Class Be the…

New social and nature prescribing hubs connect locals to community activities to combat loneliness...

The Silent Health Crisis: Why 27% of Female Deaths Are …

Medical experts issue an urgent wake-up call for Women’s Health Week, revealing how everyday delay t...

Grill'd Wraps Up Lunch With Biggest Menu Expansion…

After more than two decades spent perfecting burgers, Grill'd is entering new territory. The Aust...