The Times Australia
The Times World News

.
The Times Real Estate

.

Tech solutions to limit kids’ access to social media are fraught with problems, including privacy risks

  • Written by Lisa M. Given, Professor of Information Sciences & Director, Social Change Enabling Impact Platform, RMIT University
Tech solutions to limit kids’ access to social media are fraught with problems, including privacy risks

A campaign to block children’s access to social media to limit online harms and unhealthy internet use is picking up momentum in Australian politics[1]. The current age limit for platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok is 13, but some state governments are calling to raise this age to 16[2].

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has welcomed these efforts[3], and the federal opposition has committed[4] to introducing laws that will bar under 16-year-olds from social media.

These calls are among the latest attempts to control how young people engage with culture. From banning children’s books, to limiting television screen time[5], and rating music, movies and videogames, society often turns to government regulation to address moral panics.

Yet, critics explain the desire to control children’s access is “not really backed by robust science[6]”. They raise privacy concerns about uploading personal documents (like passports) and providing details unrelated to age (like credit card numbers) to technology companies[7]. Critics also highlight the social and informational benefits of online engagement, which may be lost if young people are banned.

These criticisms are valid, as age assurance technologies have a long way to go to address these concerns.

Is age verification even possible?

Many online sites currently rely on age gating[8], where users self-report their age. This can easily fail.

Children under 13 can provide fake birthdates to create social media accounts. And teenagers can simply tap “yes” when asked to verify if they’re over the age of 18.

To prevent children from accessing inappropriate and harmful online content, the federal government is already funding a trial of “age assurance” technologies[9].

Self-reporting is actually a type of age assurance. Other methods, including more rigorous age verification processes, are also available. However, none of them are foolproof or risk free.

So how do age verification/assurance technologies work?

Several strategies are being used or tested to identify people’s potential age.

  • User-provided age verification. This asks users to upload “hard identifiers” (such as a passport or driver’s license) as proof of age. While this approach is reliable, it excludes anyone who lacks appropriate identification.

  • Verified parental consent. A parent verifies their age (via a hard identifier) and then confirms the age of a child user, and/or approves access on their behalf. This approach requires involvement of a responsible adult, but raises concerns for young people’s privacy.

  • Age estimation using behavioural data. Artificial intelligence tools can build users’ age profiles based on platform behaviours, such as analysing the accounts they follow, posts they like and content they post. But these numeric age estimates may not match an individual’s stage of development or literacy level, or even their actual age.

  • Age estimation using biometrics. A user’s age is estimated based on biometric data (for example, facial scanning). This is a challenging approach, as facial recognition technologies are known to be biased[10] and prone to errors[11].

Unfortunately, many of these approaches raise significant privacy concerns for users, not least because a third party (such as the social media company) would be handling their ID documents and other personal data.

While government-issued digital IDs[12] may offer secure alternatives for age verification, many people may not hold passports, driver’s licenses, or other types of “hard” documentation required for these services.

What do we lose by automating age verification?

While these technologies will improve over time, now is the time to decide whether age-based bans are what we need or want.

Society may agree that online adult content – such as pornography, gambling and alcohol sites – should be restricted by age. However, banning children from all social media may cause more harm than good.

Social media platforms provide vital pathways for young people to engage with peers and seek information for school, work and personal needs. For example, YouTube and LinkedIn are critical professional development and networking tools, often used in education. Would a social media ban only target specific tools, or apply to all platforms, regardless of purpose?

By enacting age-related bans and other restrictions across the board, without discretion or consideration for individual maturity, children’s right to access information[13] will also be curtailed.

From climate change to the housing crisis, health concerns and career goals, young people need access to reliable information and community networks. Yes, they will also watch cat videos and learn about the latest fashions. And they may, inevitably, encounter inappropriate content, trolls and bullies.

Social media – as with television, internet and other media content – are best explored by children with the support of parents[14], teachers and other caregivers to guide their use.

While age assurance technologies may limit access to some adult content, these tools also restrict parental discretion to determine what is best for their children.

Appropriate social media use requires critical thinking and digital literacy skills – not only for children, but for parents and other caregivers. Government investment in educating parents and other caregivers on social media tools and safety practices would ensure families are well equipped to navigate our ever-changing social media landscape.

References

  1. ^ picking up momentum in Australian politics (www.theguardian.com)
  2. ^ raise this age to 16 (www.premier.sa.gov.au)
  3. ^ welcomed these efforts (www.sbs.com.au)
  4. ^ federal opposition has committed (www.abc.net.au)
  5. ^ screen time (www.theguardian.com)
  6. ^ not really backed by robust science (www.theguardian.com)
  7. ^ technology companies (www.abc.net.au)
  8. ^ age gating (www.thecgo.org)
  9. ^ “age assurance” technologies (theconversation.com)
  10. ^ known to be biased (mitsloan.mit.edu)
  11. ^ prone to errors (theconversation.com)
  12. ^ government-issued digital IDs (service.vic.gov.au)
  13. ^ children’s right to access information (blogs.lse.ac.uk)
  14. ^ support of parents (link.springer.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/tech-solutions-to-limit-kids-access-to-social-media-are-fraught-with-problems-including-privacy-risks-231696

The Times Features

Here's How to Pick the Best Hair Loss Treatment for Your Needs

Hair loss can be frustrating, probably an emotional experience, and only with appropriate types of treatments is one able to restore one's confidence level, showing results that ...

Property Hotspots for Australia in 2025

Introduction As we move into a new era of property investment, understanding the concept of property hotspots becomes essential for investors looking to maximize their returns. ...

INTRO Travel Predicts 2025’s Top Travel Hotspots

They’re Giving Away a Free Trip! As young travellers look ahead to 2025, certain destinations are already emerging as must-visit hotspots. According to INTRO Travel—an Austral...

Vitamin B6 is essential – but too much can be toxic. Here’s what to know to stay safe

In recent weeks, reports have been circulating[1] about severe reactions in people who’ve taken over-the-counter vitamin B6 supplements. Vitamin B6 poisoning can injure nerv...

The Benefits of Solar-Powered Heating and Cooling

As the climate becomes more unpredictable and temperatures continue to rise, staying cool during the hotter months is more important than ever. Traditional air conditioners, wh...

Cool T-Shirts for Men: Trends, Styles, and Must-Haves

People are fond of cool t-shirts for men. These allow the boys to show their personality. Yes, it works like a canvas that men use to do self-expression. Trendy men’s t-shirts ma...

Times Magazine

What to Look for When Booking an Event Space in Melbourne

Define your event needs early to streamline venue selection and ensure a good fit. Choose a well-located, accessible venue with good transport links and parking. Check for key amenities such as catering, AV equipment, and flexible seating. Pla...

How BIM Software is Transforming Architecture and Engineering

Building Information Modeling (BIM) software has become a cornerstone of modern architecture and engineering practices, revolutionizing how professionals design, collaborate, and execute projects. By enabling more efficient workflows and fostering ...

How 32-Inch Computer Monitors Can Increase Your Workflow

With the near-constant usage of technology around the world today, ergonomics have become crucial in business. Moving to 32 inch computer monitors is perhaps one of the best and most valuable improvements you can possibly implement. This-sized moni...

Top Tips for Finding a Great Florist for Your Sydney Wedding

While the choice of wedding venue does much of the heavy lifting when it comes to wowing guests, decorations are certainly not far behind. They can add a bit of personality and flair to the traditional proceedings, as well as enhancing the venue’s ...

Avant Stone's 2025 Nature's Palette Collection

Avant Stone, a longstanding supplier of quality natural stone in Sydney, introduces the 2025 Nature’s Palette Collection. Curated for architects, designers, and homeowners with discerning tastes, this selection highlights classic and contemporary a...

Professional-Grade Tactical Gear: Why 5.11 Tactical Leads the Field

When you're out in the field, your gear has to perform at the same level as you. In the world of high-quality equipment, 5.11 Tactical has established itself as a standard for professionals who demand dependability. Regardless of whether you’re inv...

LayBy Shopping