The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

the NDIS was designed to give participants choice, but mandatory registration could threaten this

  • Written by Sam Bennett, Disability Program Director, Grattan Institute
the NDIS was designed to give participants choice, but mandatory registration could threaten this

Many Australians with disability feel on the edge of a precipice right now. Recommendations from the disability royal commission and the NDIS review were released late last year. Now a draft NDIS reform bill has been tabled. In this series, experts examine what new proposals could mean for people with disability.

One of the main proposals of the review of the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) is the mandatory registration of all service providers. It is also one of the most controversial. A taskforce[1] investigating the idea, announced by NDIS Minister Bill Shorten, will report by the end of June.

At present, registration is voluntary, except for a few high-risk services such as those that use restrictive practices or provide specialist disability accommodation. About 16,000 providers are registered[2], but more than 150,000 are unregistered.

Many people in the disability community are distressed by the plan[3]. They say it will reduce their ability to choose people they know and trust as their service providers if those providers remain unregistered.

Extending provider registration (including in shared accommodation) makes sense, but not in the way proposed.

The NDIS review wants to make people in the scheme safer, get them higher-quality services, and collect data to better track the market – including monitoring abusive providers and workers[4]. But instead of lurching to mandatory registration for all, the government could take a more nuanced approach to balance safety with the “dignity of risk[5]”.

The recommendations

The premise of registration reforms is that the riskier the service provided, the more stringent the registration process should be. The review calls this a “graduated risk-proportionate regulatory model”. For example, a local laundry service would need to “enrol” with the National Disability Insurance Agency (the NDIA, which administers the scheme). This would involve an online application, ABN, Digital ID, bank account and contact details. The online application would also enable NDIA payments.

Then there would be three tiers of registration: basic, general, and advanced[6]. Basic registration would involve self-assessment and stated commitment to NDIS Practice Standards[7]. General and advanced registration would involve an audit that providers arrange and pay for themselves. For many small businesses and contractors, this could prove onerous and expensive.

The review proposes using one dimension to determine risk: the kind of service being provided. But this does not give NDIS participants – the people receiving services – the ability to take on some of the risk of screening workers themselves if they so choose.

two people prepare food in kitchen. One appeared to have disability
People with disability want the right to choose who comes into their homes. Shutterstock[8]

Read more: Draft NDIS bill is the first step to reform – but some details have disability advocates worried[9]

Some people with disability want more options, even if it involves risk

When the NDIS was designed more than a decade ago, it purposely enabled the use of unregistered providers by legislating different plan management options[10]. This deliberate policy choice was to encourage competition and innovation.

Nearly a third of NDIS participants are self-managing[11]. This means they manage their plan budget and can choose to screen their own workers and hire their own staff.

All providers, whether they register or not, have responsibilities to participants. All providers can have complaints raised against them through the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission and are held to the NDIS Code of Conduct[12]. And who is allowed to self-manage[13] is already subject to a risk assessment undertaken by the NDIA.

Deciding who supports them matters to people with disability, especially when support workers are in their homes and helping them with the most personal of care, such as getting in and out of bed, dressing or showering.

Trusted networks of workers may have been built up over many years. Yet, by categorising this kind of care as “high risk”, the proposal for mandatory registration means directly hired staff could have to undergo and pay for an audit and do extra training. Such requirements could make many established support arrangements unviable.

Australia doesn’t have to go this way. In England, under a comparable scheme, more than 69,000 people with disability directly employ more than 130,000 “personal assistants”[14]. Direct employers are encouraged to invest in training for their staff[15], but it is not mandated through formal registration.

Read more: States agreed to share foundational support costs. So why the backlash against NDIS reforms now?[16]

Thin markets

Some people in the NDIS use unregistered providers not by choice, but by necessity. In areas where there are very few providers, termed “thin markets[17]”, working with unregistered providers can be the difference between getting a service and receiving no services at all.

Unregistered providers tend to provide more short-term or one-off services[18], meaning the costs of registration might outweigh the benefits for some providers. For example, some providers who mainly work with non-disabled clients might choose to stop providing NDIS services rather than register, which would be a problem in markets with few or one provider.

Read more: Unregistered NDIS providers are in the firing line – but lots of participants have good reasons for using them[19]

A new payment system will help

A lot of the data the government needs to track down and strike off dodgy providers or workers will come through the enrolment process into the scheme’s new payment system[20] once established[21]. This will record providers’ business name, ABN or Digital ID, bank account details, location and contact details.

This information means authorities stand a much better chance of tracking spending and taking enforcement action when needed. It should help the government keep participants safer while cracking down on fraud – without necessarily requiring mandatory provider registration.

Where to from here

We need to see less heat and more light around the purpose of regulatory reform.

The focus on mandatory registration comes at the expense of deeper thinking about the problems good regulatory design needs to solve, like the shocking abuse[22] Lee-Anne Mackey suffered from carers in her group home.

People with disability deserve a more nuanced approach to regulating disability services – one that retains choice while enhancing regulatory and other protections in the settings where it is most needed.

References

  1. ^ taskforce (www.ndis.gov.au)
  2. ^ 16,000 providers are registered (www.ndisreview.gov.au)
  3. ^ distressed by the plan (everyaustraliancounts.com.au)
  4. ^ monitoring abusive providers and workers (www.theage.com.au)
  5. ^ dignity of risk (www.agedcarequality.gov.au)
  6. ^ three tiers of registration: basic, general, and advanced (www.ndisreview.gov.au)
  7. ^ NDIS Practice Standards (www.ndiscommission.gov.au)
  8. ^ Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  9. ^ Draft NDIS bill is the first step to reform – but some details have disability advocates worried (theconversation.com)
  10. ^ legislating different plan management options (www.legislation.gov.au)
  11. ^ a third of NDIS participants are self-managing (www.ndisreview.gov.au)
  12. ^ NDIS Code of Conduct (www.ndiscommission.gov.au)
  13. ^ allowed to self-manage (www.ndis.gov.au)
  14. ^ directly employ more than 130,000 “personal assistants” (www.skillsforcare.org.uk)
  15. ^ Direct employers are encouraged to invest in training for their staff (www.skillsforcare.org.uk)
  16. ^ States agreed to share foundational support costs. So why the backlash against NDIS reforms now? (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ thin markets (www.ndis.gov.au)
  18. ^ short-term or one-off services (www.ndisreview.gov.au)
  19. ^ Unregistered NDIS providers are in the firing line – but lots of participants have good reasons for using them (theconversation.com)
  20. ^ new payment system (www.ndis.gov.au)
  21. ^ established (www.ndis.gov.au)
  22. ^ the shocking abuse (www.theage.com.au)

Read more https://theconversation.com/choice-and-control-the-ndis-was-designed-to-give-participants-choice-but-mandatory-registration-could-threaten-this-224505

Times Magazine

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Science Behind Reverse Osmosis and Why It Matters

What is reverse osmosis? Reverse osmosis (RO) is a water purification process that removes contaminants by forcing water through a semi-permeable membrane. This membrane allows only water molecules to pass through while blocking impurities such as...

Foodbank Queensland celebrates local hero for National Volunteer Week

Stephen Carey is a bit bananas.   He splits his time between his insurance broker business, caring for his young family, and volunteering for Foodbank Queensland one day a week. He’s even run the Bridge to Brisbane in a banana suit to raise mon...

Senior of the Year Nominations Open

The Allan Labor Government is encouraging all Victorians to recognise the valuable contributions of older members of our community by nominating them for the 2025 Victorian Senior of the Year Awards.  Minister for Ageing Ingrid Stitt today annou...

The Times Features

Ways to Attract Tenants in a Competitive Rental Market

In the kind of rental market we’ve got now, standing out is half the battle. The other half? Actually getting someone to sign that lease. With interest rates doing backflips and ...

Top Tips for Finding the Ideal Block to Build Your Home

There’s something deeply personal and exciting about building your own home. You’re not just choosing paint colours or furniture, you’re creating a space that reflects your lifes...

The Home Buying Process Explained Step by Step

Buying a home is a thrilling milestone, but it can also feel like navigating a maze without a map. With paperwork, finances, and decisions at every turn, understanding the home-b...

Thinking of Selling Your Home? Here’s What You Need to Know

Selling a home is more than just putting up a “For Sale” sign. It’s a strategic process that involves preparation, pricing, and negotiation - all aimed at getting the best value ...

Smart Ways to Earn Passive Income from Real Estate

Imagine making money without doing much work. You get paid even while you sleep, travel, or do fun things. This is called passive income. Indeed, real estate has great ways to do...

Small Details, Big Difference: How Minor Decor Tweaks Can Redefine Your Home

Have you ever walked into a home that felt effortlessly stylish, but you couldn’t quite figure out why? It’s often not about major renovations; it’s the small details that make a...