The Times Australia
The Times World News

.

Forcing people to repay welfare ‘loans’ traps them in a poverty cycle – where is the policy debate about that?

  • Written by Hanna Wilberg, Associate professor - Law, University of Auckland

The National Party’s pledge to apply sanctions[1] to unemployed people receiving a welfare payment, if they are “persistently” failing to meet the criteria for receiving the benefit, has attracted plenty of comment and criticism[2].

Less talked about has been the party’s promise to index benefits to inflation to keep pace with the cost of living. This might at least provide some relief to those struggling to make ends meet on welfare, though is not clear how much difference it would make to the current system of indexing benefits to wages.

In any case, this alone it is unlikely to break the cycle of poverty many find themselves in.

One of the major drivers of this is the way the welfare system pushes some of the most vulnerable people into debt with loans for things such as school uniforms, power bills and car repairs.

The government provides one-off grants to cover benefit shortfalls. But most of these grants are essentially loans.

People receiving benefits are required to repay the government through weekly deductions from their normal benefits – which leaves them with even less money to survive on each week.

With rising costs[3], the situation is only getting worse for many of the 351,756 New Zealanders accessing one of the main benefits[4].

Our whittled down welfare state

Broadly, there are three levels of government benefits in our current system.

The main benefits (such as jobseeker, sole parent and supported living payment) pay a fixed weekly amount[5]. The jobseeker benefit rate is set at NZ$337.74 and sole parents receive $472.79 a week.

Read more: The Labour-National consensus on family support means the election won’t change much for NZ’s poorest households[6]

Those on benefits have access to a second level of benefits – weekly supplementary benefits such as an accommodation supplement[7] and other allowances or tax credits.

The third level of support is one-off discretionary payments for specific essential needs.

Those on benefits cannot realistically make ends meet without repeated use of these one-off payments, unless they use assistance from elsewhere – such as family, charity or borrowing from loan sharks.

This problem has been building for decades.

Benefits have been too low for too long

In the 1970s, the Royal Commission on Social Security[8] declared the system should provide “a standard of living consistent with human dignity and approaching that enjoyed by the majority”.

But Ruth Richardson’s “mother of all budgets[9]” in 1991 slashed benefits. Rates never recovered and today’s benefits are not enough to live on[10].

In 2018, the Welfare Expert Advisory Group[11] looked at how much money households need in two lifestyle scenarios: bare essentials and a minimum level of participation in the community, such as playing a sport and taking public transport.

The main benefits plus supplementary allowances did not meet the cost of the bare essentials, let alone minimal participation.

The Labour government has since increased benefit rates[12], meaning they are now slightly above those recommended by the advisory group. But those recommendations were made in 2019 and don’t take into account the sharp rise in inflation[13] since then.

Advocacy group Fairer Future[14] published an updated assessment in 2022 – nine out of 13 types of households still can’t meet their core costs with the current benefit rates.

Despite recent increases to the benefit, many are left struggling and are forced to borrow to cover essential expenses. Getty Images

How ‘advances’ create debt traps

When they don’t have money for an essential need, people on benefits can receive a “special needs grant”, which doesn’t have to be repaid. But in practice, Work and Income virtually never makes this type of grant for anything except food and some other specific items, such as some health travel costs or emergency dental treatment.

For all other essential needs[15] – such as school uniforms, car repairs, replacing essential appliances, overdue rent, power bills and tenancy bonds – a one-off payment called an “advance” is used. Advances are loans and have to be paid back.

There are several issues with these types of loans.

First, people on benefits are racking up thousands of dollars worth of debts to cover their essential needs. It serves to trap them in financial difficulties for the foreseeable future.

Read more: Why New Zealand's government cannot ignore major welfare reform report[16]

As long as they remain on benefits or low incomes, it’s difficult to repay these debts. And the Social Security Act 2018[17] doesn’t allow the Ministry of Social Development (MSD) to waive debts.

Contradictory policies

Another problem is that people on benefits have to start repaying their debt straight away, with weekly deductions coming out of their already limited benefit.

Each new advance results in a further weekly deduction. Often these add up to $50 a week or more. MSD policy says repayments should not add up to more than $40 a week, but that is often ignored.

This happens because the law stipulates that each individual debt should be repaid in no more than two years, unless there are exceptional circumstances. Paying this debt off in two years often requires total deductions to be much higher than $40.

Read more: Kindness doesn't begin at home: Jacinda Ardern's support for beneficiaries lags well behind Australia's[18]

The third issue is that one-off payments can be refused regardless of the need. That is because there are two provisions pulling in opposite directions.

On the one hand the law says a payment should be made if not making it would cause serious hardship. But on the other hand, the law also says payments should not be made if the person already has too much debt.

People receiving benefits and their case managers face the choice between more debt and higher repayments, or failing to meet an essential need.

Unexpected expenses – like car repairs – can leave people on benefits significantly in debt. Getty Images

Ways to start easing the burden

So what is the fix? A great deal could be achieved by just changing the policies and practices followed by Work and Income.

Case managers have the discretion to make non-recoverable grants for non-food essential needs. These could and should be used when someone has an essential need, particularly when they already have significant debt.

Weekly deductions for debts could also be automatically made very low.

When it comes to changing the law, the best solution would be to make weekly benefit rates adequate to live on.

The government could also make these benefit debts similar to student loans, with no repayments required until the person is off the benefit and their income is above a certain threshold.

However we do it, surely it must be time to do something to fix this poverty trap.

References

  1. ^ pledge to apply sanctions (www.1news.co.nz)
  2. ^ criticism (www.1news.co.nz)
  3. ^ rising costs (www.stuff.co.nz)
  4. ^ accessing one of the main benefits (figure.nz)
  5. ^ pay a fixed weekly amount (www.workandincome.govt.nz)
  6. ^ The Labour-National consensus on family support means the election won’t change much for NZ’s poorest households (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ accommodation supplement (www.workandincome.govt.nz)
  8. ^ Royal Commission on Social Security (mro.massey.ac.nz)
  9. ^ mother of all budgets (www.stuff.co.nz)
  10. ^ benefits are not enough to live on (www.1news.co.nz)
  11. ^ Welfare Expert Advisory Group (www.weag.govt.nz)
  12. ^ increased benefit rates (www.beehive.govt.nz)
  13. ^ sharp rise in inflation (www.stats.govt.nz)
  14. ^ Fairer Future (fairerfuture.org.nz)
  15. ^ all other essential needs (www.1news.co.nz)
  16. ^ Why New Zealand's government cannot ignore major welfare reform report (theconversation.com)
  17. ^ Social Security Act 2018 (www.legislation.govt.nz)
  18. ^ Kindness doesn't begin at home: Jacinda Ardern's support for beneficiaries lags well behind Australia's (theconversation.com)

Read more https://theconversation.com/forcing-people-to-repay-welfare-loans-traps-them-in-a-poverty-cycle-where-is-the-policy-debate-about-that-212528

Times Magazine

Headless CMS in Digital Twins and 3D Product Experiences

Image by freepik As the metaverse becomes more advanced and accessible, it's clear that multiple sectors will use digital twins and 3D product experiences to visualize, connect, and streamline efforts better. A digital twin is a virtual replica of ...

The Decline of Hyper-Casual: How Mid-Core Mobile Games Took Over in 2025

In recent years, the mobile gaming landscape has undergone a significant transformation, with mid-core mobile games emerging as the dominant force in app stores by 2025. This shift is underpinned by changing user habits and evolving monetization tr...

Understanding ITIL 4 and PRINCE2 Project Management Synergy

Key Highlights ITIL 4 focuses on IT service management, emphasising continual improvement and value creation through modern digital transformation approaches. PRINCE2 project management supports systematic planning and execution of projects wit...

What AI Adoption Means for the Future of Workplace Risk Management

Image by freepik As industrial operations become more complex and fast-paced, the risks faced by workers and employers alike continue to grow. Traditional safety models—reliant on manual oversight, reactive investigations, and standardised checklist...

From Beach Bops to Alpine Anthems: Your Sonos Survival Guide for a Long Weekend Escape

Alright, fellow adventurers and relaxation enthusiasts! So, you've packed your bags, charged your devices, and mentally prepared for that glorious King's Birthday long weekend. But hold on, are you really ready? Because a true long weekend warrior kn...

Effective Commercial Pest Control Solutions for a Safer Workplace

Keeping a workplace clean, safe, and free from pests is essential for maintaining productivity, protecting employee health, and upholding a company's reputation. Pests pose health risks, can cause structural damage, and can lead to serious legal an...

The Times Features

Prefab’s Second Life: Why Australia’s Backyard Boom Needs a Circular Makeover

The humble granny flat is being reimagined not just as a fix for housing shortages, but as a cornerstone of circular, factory-built architecture. But are our systems ready to s...

Melbourne’s Burglary Boom: Break-Ins Surge Nearly 25%

Victorian homeowners are being warned to act now, as rising break-ins and falling arrest rates paint a worrying picture for suburban safety. Melbourne residents are facing an ...

Exploring the Curriculum at a Modern Junior School in Melbourne

Key Highlights The curriculum at junior schools emphasises whole-person development, catering to children’s physical, emotional, and intellectual needs. It ensures early year...

Distressed by all the bad news? Here’s how to stay informed but still look after yourself

If you’re feeling like the news is particularly bad at the moment, you’re not alone. But many of us can’t look away – and don’t want to. Engaging with news can help us make ...

The Role of Your GP in Creating a Chronic Disease Management Plan That Works

Living with a long-term condition, whether that is diabetes, asthma, arthritis or heart disease, means making hundreds of small decisions every day. You plan your diet against m...

Troubleshooting Flickering Lights: A Comprehensive Guide for Homeowners

Image by rawpixel.com on Freepik Effectively addressing flickering lights in your home is more than just a matter of convenience; it's a pivotal aspect of both home safety and en...