The Times Australia
Fisher and Paykel Appliances
The Times World News

.

Does picking your nose really increase your risk of COVID?

  • Written by Thea van de Mortel, Professor, Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Griffith University
Does picking your nose really increase your risk of COVID?

Picking your nose is linked to an increased risk of COVID, according to a study[1] out today.

The study was conducted in health workers. This raises two main questions.

One, were these health workers washing[2] their hands[3] at work? Two, what does this study mean for the rest of us nose pickers?

Read more: When you pick your nose, you're jamming germs and contaminants up there too. 3 scientists on how to deal with your boogers[4]

What did the study find?

Some 219 Dutch health workers were monitored for COVID infection. They had regular antibody testing, which tells us if they had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID. They also reported the results of their own COVID tests.

Some 12-18 months later, the health workers were asked about their nose picking habits, and exposure to COVID via symptomatic workmates or from contacts outside work.

Just over 17% of health workers who reported picking their nose caught COVID versus about 6% of those who did not report nose picking.

At first glance, it might appear feasible that people who pick their noses would be at increased risk of contracting COVID.

That’s because COVID infection relies on the SARS-CoV-2 virus coming into contact with mucous membranes that line the respiratory system, including those in the nose.

So if someone touches a contaminated object or hand, then sticks their finger up their nose, this so-called fomite transmission can occur.

But the risk is comparatively low. The United States Centers for Disease Control estimates[5] about one in 10,000 contacts with a contaminated surface results in SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Read more: How clean is your hospital room? To reduce the spread of infections, it could probably be cleaner[6]

Hang on a minute

But there are some odd results. For example, people who picked their noses only monthly had a higher chance of infection than daily nose pickers. Logically, you would expect the daily nose pickers to have a higher risk of infection due to more transmission opportunities.

There were also several aspects of how the study was designed that may have influenced the results.

Just over half of the people approached to participate in the study actually did so, which may cause selection bias[7]. This is where people who choose to participate may differ in some key characteristic from those who don’t. These different characteristics can be “confounders[8]” that influence the results.

This was a cohort study, which followed a defined group of people for a set time and asked them questions about their habits and exposure. This study design may also be subject to bias.

That’s because people tend to answer in ways that are socially desirable[9], even in anonymous surveys. They tend to under-report behaviours seen as socially unacceptable (such as binge drinking); they over-report those that are socially acceptable.

This study did not control for this type of bias. So we cannot say for certain if someone’s report of whether and how often they picked their nose is a true reflection of what actually happened.

Health worker wearing surgical mask, scrubs and gloves outside carrying folder or clipboard
How often do you pick your nose? Your answer may not be accurate. Shutterstock[10]

People in the study may also have had trouble correctly remembering past behaviour (picking their nose) or exposures (to symptomatic people with COVID). The long time lag between when the infection data was collected and the retrospective survey increases the risk of recall error.

There is also some level of “guestimating” in the study, particularly when it comes to the risk of COVID exposure. Health workers were asked to note their contact with symptomatic people or working with COVID patients. But we can’t say if these were real “exposures”. That’s because people may not have symptoms and still have COVID (this would have under-estimated their exposure risk). Alternatively, COVID patients may not be that infectious if they don’t shed much virus (which may have over-estimated the COVID risk).

Then, it appears the analysis did not control for gender. This is potentially an issue as female health workers tend to be better[11] at following hand hygiene guidelines. The study reported a higher rate of nose picking in males and doctors, and males and doctors[12] are also worse at hand hygiene.

Surgeon washing hands in hospital How often did health workers wash their hands? The study didn’t say. Shutterstock[13]

So the nose pickers may also be worse at sanitising their hands. In other words, we don’t know if nose picking is the reason for the reported increased risk of COVID, the lack of hand hygiene, or both.

Another way of saying this is the researchers reported a correlation between nose picking and an increased risk of COVID. We cannot say one causes the other or if additional factors are involved.

Read more: Does picking your nose really increase your risk of dementia?[14]

So, what now?

Given the above limitations, the study conclusions seem overly confident. Overall, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via nose picking is probably comparatively low, particularly for the general public who are not working in high COVID environments.

But you can definitely decrease your risk through good hand hygiene (and using a tissue that you dispose of afterwards).

Better still, avoid inhaling airborne viral particles, which is the most common[15] mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Wear a good fitting mask or respirator in public, particularly in poorly ventilated or crowded inside spaces.

References

  1. ^ study (journals.plos.org)
  2. ^ washing (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  3. ^ their hands (www.safetyandquality.gov.au)
  4. ^ When you pick your nose, you're jamming germs and contaminants up there too. 3 scientists on how to deal with your boogers (theconversation.com)
  5. ^ estimates (www.cdc.gov)
  6. ^ How clean is your hospital room? To reduce the spread of infections, it could probably be cleaner (theconversation.com)
  7. ^ selection bias (www.iwh.on.ca)
  8. ^ confounders (www.sciencedirect.com)
  9. ^ socially desirable (www.ajan.com.au)
  10. ^ Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  11. ^ better (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
  12. ^ doctors (www.australiancriticalcare.com)
  13. ^ Shutterstock (www.shutterstock.com)
  14. ^ Does picking your nose really increase your risk of dementia? (theconversation.com)
  15. ^ most common (www.cdc.gov)

Read more https://theconversation.com/does-picking-your-nose-really-increase-your-risk-of-covid-210879

Times Magazine

Seven in Ten Australian Workers Say Employers Are Failing to Prepare Them for AI Future

As artificial intelligence (AI) accelerates across industries, a growing number of Australian work...

Mapping for Trucks: More Than Directions, It’s Optimisation

Daniel Antonello, General Manager Oceania, HERE Technologies At the end of June this year, Hampden ...

Can bigger-is-better ‘scaling laws’ keep AI improving forever? History says we can’t be too sure

OpenAI chief executive Sam Altman – perhaps the most prominent face of the artificial intellig...

A backlash against AI imagery in ads may have begun as brands promote ‘human-made’

In a wave of new ads, brands like Heineken, Polaroid and Cadbury have started hating on artifici...

Home batteries now four times the size as new installers enter the market

Australians are investing in larger home battery set ups than ever before with data showing the ...

Q&A with Freya Alexander – the young artist transforming co-working spaces into creative galleries

As the current Artist in Residence at Hub Australia, Freya Alexander is bringing colour and creativi...

The Times Features

Why a Holiday or Short Break in the Noosa Region Is an Ideal Getaway

Few Australian destinations capture the imagination quite like Noosa. With its calm turquoise ba...

How Dynamic Pricing in Accommodation — From Caravan Parks to Hotels — Affects Holiday Affordability

Dynamic pricing has quietly become one of the most influential forces shaping the cost of an Aus...

The rise of chatbot therapists: Why AI cannot replace human care

Some are dubbing AI as the fourth industrial revolution, with the sweeping changes it is propellin...

Australians Can Now Experience The World of Wicked Across Universal Studios Singapore and Resorts World Sentosa

This holiday season, Resorts World Sentosa (RWS), in partnership with Universal Pictures, Sentosa ...

Mineral vs chemical sunscreens? Science shows the difference is smaller than you think

“Mineral-only” sunscreens are making huge inroads[1] into the sunscreen market, driven by fears of “...

Here’s what new debt-to-income home loan caps mean for banks and borrowers

For the first time ever, the Australian banking regulator has announced it will impose new debt-...

Why the Mortgage Industry Needs More Women (And What We're Actually Doing About It)

I've been in fintech and the mortgage industry for about a year and a half now. My background is i...

Inflation jumps in October, adding to pressure on government to make budget savings

Annual inflation rose[1] to a 16-month high of 3.8% in October, adding to pressure on the govern...

Transforming Addiction Treatment Marketing Across Australasia & Southeast Asia

In a competitive and highly regulated space like addiction treatment, standing out online is no sm...